Discussion:
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist!!!!!
(too old to reply)
M_Elias
2007-04-25 01:23:23 UTC
Permalink
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.



I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was just
thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the USA I'm
sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir Kahane A"H,
Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.



So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight our
enemies legally in the Galut.



That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel that
the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person might feel
an appropriate sock in the face.



If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us but to
G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the inability to
protect our heritage and well being.



We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in our
power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that disseminate the
holohoax doctrine.



We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings that
have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that perished
because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU and in doing
so we need to take control of the media and show every vile, disgusting,
truth that the holocaust was.



We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that openly
deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11 and the
same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF WE LET
THEM.



We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.



We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by those
that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true peacemakers
and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life and our enemies
morals will become our morals and our love of God will be diminished if we
don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every country we occupy so that
our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust to be remembered as the most
wicked and violent period in modern day history so that our enemies are not
granted permission to repeat the wicked deeds of those that justified the
murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews then and now.



I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek goodness
and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate our
Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one Royal
King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Bi'nyamin Cr'amer
2007-04-25 01:57:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
Such a hashem already to have let you yids be pogrommed, expellec,
holocausted and persecuted for thousands of years.

I'd be trading him in on a more rational one.

Off you go now, Ikey. You've had or alloted spray for the month.
Ms. MICHEL'LE
2007-04-25 05:17:58 UTC
Permalink
From: ***@exite.com (M_Elias)
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias

A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
M_Elias
2007-04-26 00:27:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis? The holocaust is not a
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe. The
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons. How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?



If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!



Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for. The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.



Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show host
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Berg that spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood. According to the media they drove by
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.



Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.



If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.



It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.



When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.



And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Ms. MICHEL'LE
2007-04-26 04:52:39 UTC
Permalink
From: ***@exite.com (M_Elias)
"Ms. MICHEL'LE" <***@webtv.net> wrote in message news:27528-462EE486-***@storefull-3254.bay.webtv.net...
From: ***@exite.com (M_Elias)
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face. If we allow those that hate
us to spew their treachery not only to us but to G-d almighty then we
deserve to be treated as slaves with the inability to protect our
heritage and well being. We need to collect our thoughts, channel our
anger and do every thing in our power to reduce the monetary worth and
value of those that disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was. We need to do this now,
while the USA is at war amongst those that openly deny the holocaust,
the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11 and the same people that
seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people. We can not give up
especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by those that hate us. We
have to keep trying. We have to be the true peacemakers and fight those
that seek to destroy us and our way of life and our enemies morals will
become our morals and our love of God will be diminished if we don't
stand up and make a shout to heaven in every country we occupy so that
our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust to be remembered as the
most wicked and violent period in modern day history so that our enemies
are not granted permission to repeat the wicked deeds of those that
justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000
plus Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis? The holocaust is
not a subject that persons are given an option to believe or not
believe. The holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention
of the automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear
weapons. How do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of
the USA denied using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with
access to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were
no crimes committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination
is not a crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are
responsible for. The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person
that commits the crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death
sentence for the murders they commit during the here and now or the past
and when they commit them in the future. We can't be lenient on those
that seek to murder or bring about the death of any Jew or any person
that teaches the truth about the holocaust anywhere on earth.
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show host
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Berg that spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for
those that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it.
American Nazi extremist murdered him in cold blood. According to the
media they drove by and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in
fact the Nazis that murdered him were and still are and always will be
dangerous to themselves and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute
and antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe
Rabbenu as the divine undeniable law of the land.
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and
doctorates the persecution of the Jews is history and there is
historical documentation about every nation that has persecuted the Jews
that said such nation has been conquered by a foreign army or the
government that was opposed to persecution of the Jews.
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I
can say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing
what one wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be
that person correct or incorrect.
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to
kill those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel
preferable in a war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with
plenty of Jews as my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder,
manslaughter, or and type of illegal killing.
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of
Bar or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless
Hashem spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem
told me to kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I
would not be like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the
seed of Amalek.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias

Murder is Murder.....PERIOD!!! Violence DOESNT solve problems, only
makes it worse. Pray for your enemies! Pray for them to repent before
its too late!
Venceremos
2007-04-26 14:27:44 UTC
Permalink
SO ACCORDING TO YOU, WHEN JEWS KILL 100 MILLION PEOPLE IT IS NOT A
HOLOCAUST, BUT WHEN OTHERS KILL FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND JEWS, IT IS A
HOLOCAUST!

MAKES SENSE TO ZIOFASCISTS LIKE YOURSELF, I GUESS!
M_Elias
2007-04-27 01:39:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Venceremos
SO ACCORDING TO YOU, WHEN JEWS KILL 100 MILLION PEOPLE IT IS NOT A
HOLOCAUST, BUT WHEN OTHERS KILL FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND JEWS, IT IS A
HOLOCAUST!
MAKES SENSE TO ZIOFASCISTS LIKE YOURSELF, I GUESS!
According to me I'd like to kill you on Eretz Israel and be decorated for
it.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
f***@verizon.net
2007-04-27 03:42:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Post by Venceremos
SO ACCORDING TO YOU, WHEN JEWS KILL 100 MILLION PEOPLE IT IS NOT A
HOLOCAUST, BUT WHEN OTHERS KILL FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND JEWS, IT IS A
HOLOCAUST!
MAKES SENSE TO ZIOFASCISTS LIKE YOURSELF, I GUESS!
According to me I'd like to kill you on Eretz Israel and be decorated for
it.
Only if he acted on his words, so he's safe, being a coward,
& you'd have to look elsewhere to kill an active terrorist.

Susan
M_Elias
2007-04-27 01:37:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face. If we allow those that hate
us to spew their treachery not only to us but to G-d almighty then we
deserve to be treated as slaves with the inability to protect our
heritage and well being. We need to collect our thoughts, channel our
anger and do every thing in our power to reduce the monetary worth and
value of those that disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was. We need to do this now,
while the USA is at war amongst those that openly deny the holocaust,
the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11 and the same people that
seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people. We can not give up
especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by those that hate us. We
have to keep trying. We have to be the true peacemakers and fight those
that seek to destroy us and our way of life and our enemies morals will
become our morals and our love of God will be diminished if we don't
stand up and make a shout to heaven in every country we occupy so that
our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust to be remembered as the
most wicked and violent period in modern day history so that our enemies
are not granted permission to repeat the wicked deeds of those that
justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000
plus Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis? The holocaust is
not a subject that persons are given an option to believe or not
believe. The holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention
of the automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear
weapons. How do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of
the USA denied using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with
access to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were
no crimes committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination
is not a crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are
responsible for. The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person
that commits the crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death
sentence for the murders they commit during the here and now or the past
and when they commit them in the future. We can't be lenient on those
that seek to murder or bring about the death of any Jew or any person
that teaches the truth about the holocaust anywhere on earth.
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show host
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Berg that spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for
those that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it.
American Nazi extremist murdered him in cold blood. According to the
media they drove by and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in
fact the Nazis that murdered him were and still are and always will be
dangerous to themselves and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute
and antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe
Rabbenu as the divine undeniable law of the land.
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and
doctorates the persecution of the Jews is history and there is
historical documentation about every nation that has persecuted the Jews
that said such nation has been conquered by a foreign army or the
government that was opposed to persecution of the Jews.
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I
can say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing
what one wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be
that person correct or incorrect.
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to
kill those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel
preferable in a war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with
plenty of Jews as my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder,
manslaughter, or and type of illegal killing.
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of
Bar or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless
Hashem spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem
told me to kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I
would not be like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the
seed of Amalek.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Murder is Murder.....PERIOD!!! Violence DOESNT solve problems, only
makes it worse. Pray for your enemies! Pray for them to repent before
its too late!
I'm praying that the next time I'm home on Eretz Israel, as in times past
Hashem delivers my enemies

to me so that I may slay them in war. Killing ones enemies in war is not
murder. I do pray that sinners repent

and those sinners that are my enemies I pray that God makes me victorious
over so that they

perish rather than myself, family and friends.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Cazador
2007-04-28 02:44:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face. If we allow those that hate
us to spew their treachery not only to us but to G-d almighty then we
deserve to be treated as slaves with the inability to protect our
heritage and well being. We need to collect our thoughts, channel our
anger and do every thing in our power to reduce the monetary worth and
value of those that disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was. We need to do this now,
while the USA is at war amongst those that openly deny the holocaust,
the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11 and the same people that
seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people. We can not give up
especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by those that hate us. We
have to keep trying. We have to be the true peacemakers and fight those
that seek to destroy us and our way of life and our enemies morals will
become our morals and our love of God will be diminished if we don't
stand up and make a shout to heaven in every country we occupy so that
our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust to be remembered as the
most wicked and violent period in modern day history so that our enemies
are not granted permission to repeat the wicked deeds of those that
justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000
plus Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis? The holocaust is
not a subject that persons are given an option to believe or not
believe. The holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention
of the automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear
weapons. How do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of
the USA denied using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with
access to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were
no crimes committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination
is not a crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are
responsible for. The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person
that commits the crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death
sentence for the murders they commit during the here and now or the past
and when they commit them in the future. We can't be lenient on those
that seek to murder or bring about the death of any Jew or any person
that teaches the truth about the holocaust anywhere on earth.
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show host
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for
those that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it.
American Nazi extremist murdered him in cold blood. According to the
media they drove by and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in
fact the Nazis that murdered him were and still are and always will be
dangerous to themselves and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute
and antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe
Rabbenu as the divine undeniable law of the land.
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and
doctorates the persecution of the Jews is history and there is
historical documentation about every nation that has persecuted the Jews
that said such nation has been conquered by a foreign army or the
government that was opposed to persecution of the Jews.
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I
can say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing
what one wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be
that person correct or incorrect.
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to
kill those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel
preferable in a war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with
plenty of Jews as my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder,
manslaughter, or and type of illegal killing.
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of
Bar or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless
Hashem spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem
told me to kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I
would not be like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the
seed of Amalek.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Murder is Murder.....PERIOD!!! Violence DOESNT solve problems, only
makes it worse. Pray for your enemies! Pray for them to repent before
its too late!
I'm praying that the next time I'm home on Eretz Israel, as in times past
Hashem delivers my enemies
to me so that I may slay them in war. Killing ones enemies in war is not
murder. I do pray that sinners repent
and those sinners that are my enemies I pray that God makes me victorious
over so that they
perish rather than myself, family and friends.
A wonderful policy for Americans, particularly for those who are 98%
of the population and who fight 99.999999% of America's wars. Yes,
Elias, Americans. We're the key to this mess, this existential
catastrophe which is still escalating exponentially, and 98% of us are
not Jewish. Listen up, damn it! Who do you think you are? If you want
Israel to take on the entire Muslim world single-handedly in the
nuclear age with New York City as the first target, well I guess
that's part of the sovereignty principle--unless you're an American.
But don't expect our children and grandchildren to fight these stupid
wars for you. Start doing laps, get a prophylactic angioplasty, grease
up your uzi and do it yourself. My granddaughter, for example, has
declared that this time around she's not going to do it for you.
Post by M_Elias
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Would that you knew how right you are.

PS: Please, Woody, weigh in here. Ask your friends to shake off the
fear and to speak up. We saw Scoop last night and I know damned well
that not one of those friends of yours is an Abe Foxman type. In fact
you spoke up in a cinematic patter with Scarlett. How about doing it
again, this time really in public without ambiguity, without it
looking like mere tinsel town froth. We need you , Woody.
PRINCEANDY
2007-04-28 07:36:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
Hey dickhead youy can blabber on all you like that b;lacks were never slaves
and the overwhelming evidence would bury your rather stupid and inept
comparison, and argument. But you can put out al yhe BS you want and you wl
be brought down by evidence.

Not stories fanciful stories contradicted on all sides by solid evidence of
aircraft pictures, expert evidence, and historians who are promptly jailed
in some countries because they prove the whole fairy tale false and
corrupt.Also fellow jews, Germans and any non jew not looking for a
reparation handout.
Post by M_Elias
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened?
We have been allowing the scum of the earth to make a good living out of
disseminating lies and building museums on those lies extending the ill
feeling and discord of the war just for the personal profit of one section
of the community.

Have we forgotten how to fight
Post by M_Elias
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
They are put in jail, I mean how dare they question such a huge source of
fraudelent income??




If we allow those that hate
Post by M_Elias
us to spew their treachery not only to us but to G-d almighty then we
deserve to be treated as slaves with the inability to protect our
heritage and well being. We need to collect our thoughts, channel our
anger and do every thing in our power to reduce the monetary worth and
value of those that disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews
What a load of crap - the 6 million was discarded years ago as absolutel
fraudelent dickhead.



and non-Jews that
Post by M_Elias
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler
And the ambitions of a few graady zionists.


According to the World Almanach there were 400,000 Jews in germany in 1939.
However thousands of them left for the greener pastures, and it is doubtful
if there were more than 300,000 by the time Hitler started
hounding them.

LINKS THAT WERE BROKEN BY THE HOLOCAUST COSPIRACY OF LIES.
2 SNOWY HAIRED 7 AND 8 YEAR OLD KIDS , A GIRL AND A BOY PLAYING IN THE
CONFUSION THAT WAS EUROPE DURING WWII CAME ACROSS A LARGE BLACK MAN SITTING
VERY QUIETLY AND STARTED TO SPEAK TO HIM AND PLAYFULLY TOUCH HIM.
HE CAME TO LIFE AND CHASED THEM OFF STILL NOT MOVING JUST BY YELLING AND
WAVING HIS ARMS. THE KIDS MOVED TO WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS A SAFE DISTANCE
STILL TEASING HIM AS PLAYFUL STUPID 7 AND 8 YEAROLDS WILL.
THEN THE MAN HAVING APPARENTLY FRIGHTENED THEM OF TO A SAFE DISTANCE BLEW UP
INTO THE AIR SO FRIGHTENING THE 2 KIDS THEY RAN OF IN A PANIC TO TELL THEIR
MOTHER WHO WAS RESTING WITH OTHER REFUGEES .

THAT WAS THE LAST OF THE INCIDENT FOR THE KIDS ANYWAY TILL I WAS TALKING TO
THE RELATIVES NOW GROWN UP ADULTS AND REALISED WHAT HAD POSSIBLY HAPPENED.

WITH AN EXSERVICEMAN FATHER THERE WAS ONE LANDMINE IN WWII THAT I BELIEVE
YOU KNEW YOU HAD TRIGGERED WHEN YOU HEARD THE CLICK. THE NEXT SOUND YOU KNEW
YOU WOULD HEAR WOULD BE THE EXPLOSION WHICH WOULD IN ALL PROBABILITY KILL
YOU.

THAT IS ONE OF A THOUSAND STORIES THAT SHOULD HAVE CEMENTED RELATIONS
BETWEEN AMERICANS AND EUROPEANS IN THAT A LOT OF THE AMERICAN SERVICEMEN
TOOK HOME WIVES FROM EUROPE CEMENTED ON DANGEROUS MEETINGS LIKE THAT
DESCRIBED ABOVE THAT MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE SERVICEMANS LIFE.

HOWEVER THE FIRST TING THE EUROPEAN FOUND ON ARRIVING IN ANY OF THE WESTERN
DEMOCRACIES WAS THAT THE WATER HAD BEEN NICELY MUDDIED SO THAT WHEN YOU
INNOCENTLY CAME OUT WITH THE TRUTH AS YOU KNEW IT IN EUROPE HAVING LIVED
THROUGH IT, YOU WERE TOLD THAT YOU DID NOT KNOW WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT
AND HAD BEEN BRAINWASHED BY THE NAZIS BECAUSE THE JEWISH GROCERS AUNTY TOLD
HER ALL ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED .

AND YOU WERE IN SOMEONES ELSES COUNTRY INTERMARRIED AND ALL .
YOU HAD THE SAME FREEDOMS THAT YOU NOW ENJOY IN OUR WESTERN DEMOCRACIES, AND
SOME OF YOU TURNED ON THE PEOPLE AND COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE TO SHOW YOUR
SOLIDARITY WITH JEWS/ZIONISTS.

THERE WERE JEWS WHO WERE LOYAL GERMAN CITIZENS AND WORKED WITH THE GERMANS .

Jews in German army
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html

http://judaism.about.com/b/a/039042.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/675641/posts
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/jewishnazi.html
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righitpix.html
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERmiltch.htm
http://www.jugendgeschichtswerkstatt.de/strassennamen/fliegerviertel/flieger
viertel.html
http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/gerjews.htm
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/00/03/NSJews.html
Here by a Munich-born historian saluting in moving detail a group of little
known
heroines - the women, nearly all of them German, who opposed Hitler both
before and, more dramatically, during the war.

http://www.new-books-in-german.com/aut2001/book05a.htm
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html

http://www.msnbc.com/news/606092.asp?0si=-&cp1=1
Who has said, America and Israel? I'll pick Israel every time. That is a guy
who was educated, worked in intelligence in the air force in America


http://www.von-waldenburg.com/reviews.html
WOMAN WHO LIVED THROUGH WAR IN GERMANY

HORRORS LET LOOSE BY WAR
http://www.technologyartist.com/unit_731/comments_731.html


http://www.tribalmessenger.org/
PEACE GROUP

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
wwii CASUALTIES

TIME ACADEMICS STOPPED JEWS AND SUPPORTERS ENJOYING A GOOD LIVING ON
LIES AND DISHONEST PRACTICES IN CORRUPTING OUR HISTORY WHILE SUPPORTING THE
JAILING OF HONEST ACADEMICS TRYING TO PRESENT AND INCORPORATE THE TRUTH IN
WHAT IS MAINLY OUR HISTORY OF WWII AND NOT THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE
JEWQW/ZIONIST/ISRAELI CLIQUE TO USE TO SUPPORT FURTHER LIES AND
MISREPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE PRACTICES OF THE ZIONISTS AND SAME GROUP WHO
ARE IN POWER IN ISRAEL.
UK to Israeli Profs: Class Dismissed
------------------------------------
The weird movement to boycott Israeli academics
By Ari Paul
NOTHING WEIRD , THE WEIRD IS THE STANDING BACK AND ACTUALLY ALLOWING THE
PAMPERED AND EGOTISTICAL JEWISH/ZIONIST/ISRAELI ACADEMICS BLUFF THEM INTO
NOT CONTRADICTING ALL THE LIES THEY HAVE ACTUALLY MADE A PART OF WWII
HISTORY AND ALLOWED AND SUPPORTED THE JAILING OF JEWISH AND NONJEWISH
HISTORIANS DOING NO MORE THAN THEIR JOB BY MAKING AN HONEST EVALUATION OF
THE HOLOCAUST CLAIMS AS NOT SUPPORTED BY HISTORICAL FACT.

AND IN SO DOING SUPPORTING THE LIES AND PROPAGANDA SPREAD BY ISRAEL AND
SUPPORTERS WHO ARE NOT EITHER LOYAL CITIZENS OR HONEST MEN/WOMEN.

ALLOWING THESE FRAUDS TO ENJOY A GOOD LIVING WHILE ALLOWING HONEST ACADEMICS
TO BE PERSECUTED.


http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html
The first point to note regarding the appropriation of the history of the
Holocaust by Zionist propaganda is that Zionism without anti-Semitism is
impossible. Zionism agrees with the basic tenet of anti-Semitism, namely
that Jews cannot live with non-Jews.

THE SECOND POINT IS IF THE ZEALOTS ARE SO UNABLE TO ACCEPT CO HABITATION
WITH NONJEWS, THEN THE JEWS /ZIONISTS SHOULD BE OBLIGED TO TAKE THE SAME
ACTION IN SILENCING THEIR AS NON JEWS DO AND ARE CONTINUALLY ASKED TO CHECK
ON THE STRENGHT OF A BIASED INACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF HISTORY TO ELICIT
SYMPATHY AND SUPPORT.




Until the early 1970s two different sets of arithmetic books were used in
Israel. One for the secular schools, employing an inverted "T" sign. In the
early '70's the religious fanatics "converted" the Labor Party to the great
danger of the cross in arithmetic, and from that time, in all Hebrew
elementary schools (and now many high schools as well) the international
plus sign has been forbidden.

Similar development is visible in other areas of education. Teaching the New
Testament was always forbidden, but in the old time conscientious teachers
of history used to circumvent the prohibition, by organizing seminars or
sending the students to libraries (not the school libraries, of course).

About 10 years ago there was a wave of denouncing such teachers. One in
Jerusalem was almost sacked, for advising her history pupils, who were
studying the history of Jews in Palestine around 30-40 AD, that it would be
a good thing if they would read a few chapters of the New Testament as a
historical aid. She retained her post only after humbly promising not to do
this again.

Nonetheless, it came into force on April 1, 1978, prohibiting the offering
of ¡§material inducement¡š for a person to change his religion. A material
inducement could be something as minor as the giving of a Bible
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/rel-christians.html


AND WE ALLOW ACADEMICS WITH THE MOST BARBARIC OF ISRAEL/ZIONIST/JEWISH
PHILOSOPHIES HOLD IMPORTANT POSITIONS IN OUR INSTITUTIONS PASSING ON THIS
OPINION OF HATE AND SUPPRESSION.

The Israel Lobby John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html


http://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973
HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET
The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record:
A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah

Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for
his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects
such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose
of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real
consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce
whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering. For 15 months
Dershowitz has applied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less
physically painful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of
Beyond Chutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human
rights record and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most
powerful law firms in the country after his personal initiatives proved
unsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highly
respected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication of my
book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth"
that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards.

Dershowitz justified these blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond
Chutzpah libels him. Yet, when I first began to expose his gross scholarly
misconduct, Dershowitz publicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that
he wouldn't respond with a libel action because he believed "so strongly in
the First Amendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he was
threatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits,
Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued Deborah
Lipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case [against
Lipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books critical of Irving,
out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits. That was
a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History on Trial; his
emphasis).

My publisher, University of California Press, was understandably at great
pains to fend off a potential lawsuit by Dershowitz; for an academic
publisher the associated costs would have been ruinous, to the point of
making certain victory meaningless. On occasion our relationship became
strained and at one point it appeared as if we had reached an impasse.
However, through the skillful mediation of Nation magazine senior editor
Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of Beyond Chutzpah) and others, a
satisfactory compromise was reached that protected the interests of both
publisher and author, and, most importantly, preserved the integrity of the
book. I would like personally to extend my heartfelt thanks to all who
supported me and the press during this difficult period.

WALK OPENLY OVER OUR , I HOPE, STRONGLY HELD BELIEFS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH
AND ASSOCIATION. AND RIGHTS THAT THEY HAVE NEVER INCORPORATED OR PRACTISED
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH THEY HAVE HAD A POSITION OF CONTROL.

WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany;
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,imprisoned or both for
discussing the topics set forth in this article.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/843805.html
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/843805.html
In the service of the Jewish state
By Shraga Elam and Dennis Whitehead
In the late 1940s, Walther (Walter) Rauff,
an SS officer who was responsible for the
murder of at least 100,000 people and was
wanted by the Allies as a war criminal,
was employed by the Israeli secret service.
Instead of bringing him to justice it
paid him for his services and helped
him escape to South America.
Documents of the U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
that have been released over the past
several years show that the Americans
were aware that Rauff's case was not
exceptional.
A CIA memorandum dated March 24, 1950
describes the relations between the
Israel agent Edmond (Ted) Cross,
whose name is deleted on this document,
"Subject's engagement be [sic]
the Israeli Intelligence Service
would fit into the picture as
revealed by talks with X with
[Edmond (Ted) Cross a.k.a. Magen or Crowder]
consisting in the utilization of former Nazi
elements for observation and penetration in
the Arab countries.
The attempt to send the well-known
former SS Colonel Walter Rauff to
Egypt having failed,
the Israeli Service with all
probability (however this has
not yet been confirmed) had
engaged Subject [Walberg],
whose sentiments and past
would arouse no suspicions
in Egypt that he is a
Jewish agent."
An earlier document,
from February 1950, states that
Cross helped Rauff obtain the
necessary papers for immigration
to South America,
even though the attempt to
send him to Egypt had failed.
Why, though, did Israel help Rauff?
"It is not improbable that Subject's
presence in Syria was in connection
with a mission for the Israel[i] service."
Rauff was indeed in Syria,
serving as military adviser
to President Hosni Zaim,
who sought a peace agreement with Irsael.
Rauff was forced to leave
after Zaim was deposed in
a military coup.
The mission Rauff was to have
carried out in Egypt is not known,
but his connection with Cross may
supply more than a hint.
According to research by Ruth Kimche,
a former Mossad employee,
Cross was sent in July 1948,
as the War of Independence raged,
to assassinate several key figures
in Egypt with the help of a group
of Jews.
At the last minute the mission was called off.
Cross returned to Egypt in September,
but again the plan was not executed,
probably because he became entangled
in a love affair with the Egyptian
Princess Amina Nur a-Din and had
to leave the country.
According to Kimche,
"The whole story is very
reminiscent of the Lavon
Affair of the 1950s,
except that fortunately for
them the 1948 plan was not
implemented,
apparently thanks to
the Egyptian princess."
But the plan was not jettisoned, either.
In 1949, as the U.S. documents show,
Cross wanted to sent Rauff to Egypt.
According to another
document in Rauff's CIA file,
Rauff did not reach Egypt,
but a 1953 memorandum quotes
the U.S. ambassador to Egypt
as saying that a man named
Rauff was in the country.
True,
the memorandum describes this Rauff as a Pole,
but it also notes that he organized the
extermination of Jews in Poland,
making it very likely that the
reference is to the famous
Nazi officer.
Rauff was born in 1906.
He served in the German
Navy from the age of 18.
In 1937 he was dismissed for
conduct unbecoming an officer
due to adultery.
A close friend and fellow former naval officer,
Reinhard Heydrich, who was then deputy commander
of the SS under Heinrich Himmler,
helped get him into the Nazi organization.
Initially Rauff served in
SS headquarters in Berlin.
After the conquest of Norway in 1940
he headed the security police there
for three months.
That year he was reinstated in the Navy,
at his request, and commanded a fleet of
minesweepers, but in 1941 Heydrich
summoned him back to SS headquarters.
When Heydrich was appointed
governor of occupied Czechoslovakia,
Rauff accompanied him to Prague as
his technical assistant.
He returned to Berlin in June 1942,
after Heydrich's assassination by
the Czech resistance.
Rauff was appointed head of
the SS Technical Department
and was responsible for the
project of extermination using
gas vans.
After Jews and others were
herded into the back of a gas van,
the vehicle was sealed and the
exhaust pipe introduced into the
back.
When the engine was turned
on the fumes killed everyone
in the back of the vehicle.
Between 97,000 and 200,000 people,
most of them Jews, were murdered
in this way.
This method of mass murder
was too slow and cumbersome
for the Nazis, however,
who went on to develop the
gas chambers using Zyklon B
as the killing agent.
From July 1942 until May 1943,
Rauff also commanded the Einsatzkommando
(a unit of the Einsatzgruppen,
the mobile killing squads that
were in charge of annihilating Jews)
in North Africa and was responsible
for concentrating the Jews in Tunisia.
In July 1943,
after a brief stay in Berlin,
he was made commander of the
Einsatzkommando in Corsica,
and from September 1943 until
the end of the war was the SS
Kommandant in Milan.
As such,
he took part in the secret
negotiations that led to the
surrender of the Nazis in
northern Italy.
Rauff,
unlike other Nazis who
participated in the talks,
was arrested by the Allies
on April 30, 1945.
In 1947 he escaped and was
recruited for Syrian intelligence
by Captain Akram Tabara,
who gave his name as
Dr. John Homsi.
Rauff advised President Hosni Zaim
in Syria and was arrested on the day
of the coup against him.
Rauff managed to convince his
captors that he was only an
adviser and had no command powers;
he was released but ordered to
leave the country.
According to one of the
versions in the CIA files,
Rauff was suspected of ties
to "subversive Communist activity,"
as the agent of a German named Von Lipkau.
After Rauff's expulsion from Syria,
he was supposed to accompany Lipkau
to India to disseminate Communist
propaganda.
According to one CIA report,
the mission was aborted because
Lipkau remained in Tel Aviv due
to other commitments.
From Damascus Rauff went to Beirut,
and from there to Italy.
With the assistance of Israeli,
and apparently also British
intelligence,
he sailed for South
America in December 1949.
He settled in Quito, the capital of Ecuador.
A 1953 report put him in Buenos Aires,
where he probably headed an
anti-Communist group.
In 1958 Rauff moved to Chile,
obtaining permanent residency
status there a year later.
He became a cattle and fish
merchant and was described
as a rancher and an industrialist.
His son, also named Walter,
was accepted to the Chilean
naval academy and was the
protege of Chief of Staff
General Carlos Prats,
a supporter of the socialist
President Salvador Allende.
The son denies that his
father ever worked for Israel.
On December 19, 1962,
Rauff was arrested in Chile
after West Germany requested
his extradition.
Chile's Supreme Court refused
the request and released Rauff.
Allende's election as president
in a friendly letter to Nazi
hunter Simon Wiesenthal Allende
wrote that he could not reverse
the court's 1962 decision.
In September 1973,
Allende was killed in a military
coup against his democratically
elected government.
A few months later,
the French paper Le Monde
reported that Rauff was
appointed head of Chile's
intelligence service;
the report was denied
by the Chilean government.
Ten years later, in January 1984,
Chile turned down an extradition
request for Rauff from Israel's
Justice Ministry.
A month later,
West Germany repeated
its extradition request.
Chile said the case would
be reopened only if it were
presented with evidence of
new crimes.
Extraditing Rauff would not
serve any public interest in
Chile, the court said,
since he had lived in the
country for many years and
his behavior was always
beyond reproach.
The U.S. government got into the act,
emphasizing to Chile its conviction
that Nazi criminals must face trial.
The Santiago government came
under heavy international
pressure to extradite Rauff.
Both President Ronald Reagan
and British Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher addressed
the issue in 1984,
but their comments did not
impress Chilean dictator
Augusto Pinochet.
The Nazi hunter Beate Klarsfeld
traveled to Chile to organize
protests over the issue and was
arrested twice for disturbing
the peace.
Then director general of Israel's
Foreign Ministry, David Kimche,
visited Santiago in 1984.
The press reported that he
urged his hosts to deport Rauff,
whom he described as one of the
major war criminals living in a
Western country.
His wife, Ruth Kimche,
said on behalf of her
husband that he does
not recall this;
they were in Chile on a private visit,
she says.
The sincerity of the Israeli
efforts toward Rauff's capture
can be gauged from the fact that
already in 1979 Israel sold patrol
boats to Chile and then overhauled
Chilean war planes,
and in 1984 was still
assisting with their
maintenance.
Rauff died of lung cancer in May 1984.
The statement issued by the Israeli
"The problem with Mr. Rauff
is now solved. God has tried him."
The fact that Rauff supplied
intelligence to Israel has
been published before,
but for some reason the
reports did not generate
a public debate over the
moral implications of Israel's
providing protection to a major
Nazi criminal,
who was the subject of an
international campaign by
Nazi hunters Simon Wiesenthal
and Beate Klarsfeld to bring
him to trial.
Similarly, the renowned U.S.
Holocaust researcher Richard
Breitman,
who as director of historical research
for the Nazi War Criminal Records
Interagency Working Group reviewed
Rauff's CIA file,
chose to ignore information
indicating that Israeli
intelligence systematically
employed Nazis in Arab countries.
According to CIA records
Rauff's handler was Ted Cross,
whose Hebrew name was David Magen.
Cross was recruited in 1948 for
clandestine activity by Asher
Ben-Natan,
director of operations in the
Foreign Ministry's Political
Department,
which served as the precursor to the Mossad.
Cross was fluent in several languages
and had served in British intelligence
in World War II.
According to an article by Gil Meltzer
in the daily Yedioth Ahronoth from
a year ago, Cross -
who was from a wealthy
Jewish Budapest family
named Gross -
was an international adventurer,
a hedonist and a womanizer.
To pay for his flashy lifestyle,
he dealt in drugs.
When Israel discovered that he
had also sold his services as
an agent to Egypt -
for the very handsome sum
of $20,000 -
he was arrested and sentenced
to a lengthy prison term.
After his release he went into
the restaurant business and,
among other things, helped
found the Wimpy's hamburger
chain.
Can the Israeli government be
blamed for the ties between
Cross and Rauff,
or was this a private initiative
by the double agent?
The CIA, it turns out,
did not know some important
details about Rauff's connections
with Israeli intelligence.
In Passover of 1993,
Shlomo Nakdimon published an
nterview with Shalhevet Freier
in Yedioth Ahronoth.
In the late 1940s Freier was a
branch director in the Foreign
Ministry's Political Department,
and in the 1970s he chaired the
Israel Atomic Energy Commission.
He has since died.
In the interview he related
how he had recruited Rauff in Italy,
after friends in the Italian Foreign
Ministry tipped him off about the new
arrival.
Rauff was using an alias at the time.
According to Freier, then,
it was the Political Department
that employed Rauff;
there is no mention of Cross in his interview.
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/


Jews and Palestinians genetically similar.
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html

War without end
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590


Yes and you have no quarrel with the US?
They dont have to, they use their army to shoot, run over and mistreat
physically and sexually helpless children. What can a Palestinian do when
the mighty money contributing yanks cannot protect their citizens.

http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/79400p-72974c.html
One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion??

And the chimp smirks on
_ HYPERLINK "http://www.smirkingchimp.com/print.php?sid=26276" __
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/print.php?sid=26276



http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/01AA7ECA-7018-447B-A10D-9E4139D4788A.
htm

_
American and Australian shot by Israelis
Chris McGreal talks to the relatives of three British and American victims
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1066817,00.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1066817,00.html
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,916299,00.html
http://www.omjp.org/rachelphotos.html
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8853425952359751341&q=Palestinian+p
eople


http://www.nogw.com/israeliatrocities.html
http://www.palestinefacts.org/index.php
http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story-2003112917164320.htm
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/IsraelsTortureBan.html

http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0197/9701007.htm

Christian homes being knocked down???
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/05/1607911.php


(Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Israeli soldiers can beat up a priest on the West Bank, then shoot up his
church during Mass, and only the Catholic press takes note...If Christians
had done such a thing to a synagogue, anywhere, it would have been
front-page news, everywhere. (Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National
Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Farmers harassed and shot in israel
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3757004.stm
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=53042


Zionist settler deliberately hits and kills Palestinian old man
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_3293.shtml
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_3396.shtml
http://judicial-inc.biz/School_shooting.htm



http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/20deae4bed
c378ab?q=&rnum=1
In a letter to the conference host, UNESCO Director-General Koichiro
Matsuura,
the protesters said the Wiesenthal center, "under the deceitful cover of the
struggle against anti-Semitism, is on the contrary encouraging intolerance
and
racism in our societies."

Jon and David Kimche
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html
The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany's Jews to Palestine.

The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a German
offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the
other Jewish groups made no effort to influence the United States and the
32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German
and Austrian Jews.
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/Jews-who-helped-nazis-hit
ler.htm



Marlon Brando.
http://www.theunjustmedia.com/ben%20stein%20on%20jewish%20media%20control.ht
m




If one wants to exterminate an entire race, one would start with the leaders
first and

Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich

On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim
Holocaust Calendar
Jewish dominance

Rabbi to Publish Book on Jewish Supremacy
... One is Rabbi Saadya Grama, author of an upcoming book "On the Exalted
Nature of Israel and Understanding ... Written by Rabbi Saadya Grama - an
alumnus of Beth Medrash Govoha, the ...
more hits from:
ttp://atheism.about.com/b/a/057831.htm?terms=published+book - 25 KB

The Jews declared war against Germany
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.
http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecw
ar.html
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ds9.htm


http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
The Zionist Jewish Role In - Causing World War II
"In 1941, a Jewish writer, Theodor N. Kaufman, wrote Germany Must Perish.
Kaufman set out a plan for the total destruction of the German population by
a very simple method: the mass sterilisation of all German men and women
between the age of puberty and sixty years."

From a pre-1993 edition of John Tyndall's Spearhead magazine
12-9-3

http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
Immediately after Japan declared war on the United States of America, the
order was issued to round up all Americans of Japanese ancestry and imprison
them in large camps. A declaration of war entitles any nation to imprison
its enemy and their sympathizers.
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.
The basic question arises; what were the Germans supposed to do with their
large Jewish population?
Ø The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a
German
offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the
other Jewish groups made no effort to influence the United States and the
32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German
and Austrian Jews.
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/Jews-who-helped-nazis-hit
ler.htm






http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Zundel1/transport.htm
· England's Lord Shawcross, her most famous legal mind, stated in 1984. ''I
have come to the realization that Hitler did not want war. It was us who
declared war .'', etc. ad nauseum. His admission of historical truth was
subsequently swept under the rug, never to be repeated in public print
again.


http://americandefenseleague.com/whyhitlr.htm Why Hitler Came to Power:
One Rabbi's Explanation - By Rabbi Dr. Manfred Reifer - We played with the
most holy possessions of the people and at times made fun of all that was
sacred to the nation.
http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
That second war was later made certain, not by the intentions of Hitler but
by the determination of his eternal enemies to destroy the new Germany that
he had created.
By the Treaty of Versailles on 28 June 1919 and the Treaty of St. Germain on
20 September of the same year, the German people were thoroughly humiliated.
The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, wrote:
'The international bankers swept statesmen, politicians, journalists and
jurists all to one side and issued their orders with the imperiousness of
absolute monarchs.'
However, the Four Nations Pact was not to be. The Jews put an end to this,
for on 7 November 1938, a few weeks after the Munich Agreement and shortly
before the journey to Paris of the German Foreign Minister, Von Ribbentrop,
the Polish Jew, Herschel Feibel Grynszpan murdered the German Third
Secretary of State, Ernst von Rath, in the German Embassy in Paris. The five
bullets fired were the logical result of the Jews' declaration of war on
Germany of March 1933 and put an end to the effort being made to explain and
extend the importance of the Munich Agreement and the revision of the Treaty
of Versailles.
This assassination provoked anti-Jewish riots in Germany, with the burning
of synagogues and the looting and burning of Jewish shops. The anti-Jewish
riots inflamed public opinion in Great Britain and the USA against
Chamberlain's efforts to relieve Anglo-German tension. In the United States
Germans were assaulted and persecuted. The Jews began leaving Germany.
The Paris magazine L'Ami du Peuple wrote about them:
'These people fled from Germany because they attempted to set up a rule of
fire and blood and to let loose the horrors of civil war and universal
chaos.'
The American Secretary of State, James Forrestal, who later died in
mysterious circumstances, wrote in his Forrestal Diaries (Cassel and Co.,
London 1952):
'Have played golf with Joe Kennedy [US Ambassador in Britain, father of
President John Kennedy]. According to him, Chamberlain declared that Zionism
and world Jewry have obliged England to enter the war.'
The Jew, Schlomo Asch, in a pep talk to French troops in the line in Le
Nouvelles Litteraires (10 February 1940) wrote:
'This is our war and you are fighting it for us. Even if we Jews are not
bodily in the trenches we are nevertheless morally with you.'
On 8 October 1942 Sentinel magazine stated unequivocally:
'The Second World War is being fought for the defence and fundamentals of
Judaism.'

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=3&ar=201
NEW YORK, Aug. 29 (JTA) â?" Since 1996, Jewish groups and their lawyers have
gone to the mat with the likes of the Germans, the Swiss and the French,
extracting $9 billion in restitution for the evil wrought in Europe by
Naziforces and their collaborators.

http://www.geocities.com/truth4ever123/41.htm
In the magazine Kefonium ;Jerusalem no 14 Feb 1982 page 49-59
Iraq that country which is rich with its petrol resources and have a lot of
internal struggles is
located in the frontline with Israel and its decomposition is critical for
Israel may more than
defeating Syria as Iraq resembles on short range the biggest threat for
Israel in the area .

No Documentary Evidence

Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story cannot
be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish Inmates Unable to Work

It is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were unable to work were
immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young, sick, or weak were
supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who could be worked to death
were temporarily kept alive.

But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the Jewish
inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not killed. For
example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4, 1943, from the
chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS Economic and
Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of 25,000 Jewish inmates
in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and that all of the remaining
Jewish inmates -- some 21,500, or about 86 percent -- were unable to work.
[9]

This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on "security
measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS concentration camp
system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported that there was a total
of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were
hospitalized or disabled. In the Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly
the main extermination center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of
whom "approximately 15,000 are unable to work." [10]

These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.

The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily as a
camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and elderly, as
well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment to other camps.
That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of Northwestern University,
who also says that this was the reason for the unusually high death rate
there. [11]

Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in his 1989 book about the "final solution" that more Jews
perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural" causes than
were executed. [12]
Anne Frank

Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known around
the world for her famous diary. But few people know that thousands of Jews,
including Anne and her father, Otto Frank, "survived" Auschwitz.

The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands to
Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of the
advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other Jews to the
Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March 1945.

Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews who
were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January 1945,
shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in Switzerland in
1980.

If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they would
not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was, cannot be
reconciled with the extermination story.
Allied Propaganda

The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay statements
of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any evidence of
extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because rumors about
gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.

Allied planes dropped large numbers of leaflets, written in Polish and
German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that people
were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story, which was an
important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort, was also broadcast
to Europe by Allied radio stations. [13]
Survivor Testimony

Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of extermination at
Auschwitz.

An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp experiences
in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was interned in
Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced
laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the
others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz.

Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into
a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women
were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came
out of the shower heads.

Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the death
of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and quite a few
committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings,
gassings, or of any extermination program. [14]

A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary
in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.
She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gas
chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing
stories only later. [15]
Inmates Released

More than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,
and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. In
addition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences were
released, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz had
actually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening there?
Himmler Orders Death Rate Reduced

In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially typhus,
the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated Dec.
28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It sharply
criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered
that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly
reduce the death rate in the various camps." Furthermore, it ordered:

"The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition
of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit
improvement recommendations to the camp commandants ... The camp doctors
are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor places
are improved as much as possible."

Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler]
has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced." [17]
Telltale Aerial Photos

Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau on
several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged extermination
period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These photos show no
trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys or masses of Jews
awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly alleged, and all of which
would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz had been the extermination
center it is said to have been. [18]
Absurd Cremation Claims

Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could not
possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and summer of
1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.

For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation story
is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even 20,000
corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944 in
crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond the realm of
reality," he declared under oath. [19]
Gassing Expert Refutes Extermination Story

America's leading gas chamber expert, Fred A. Leuchter, carefully examined
the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and concluded that the Auschwitz
gassing story is absurd and technically impossible.

Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of gas
chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals. For
example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.

In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the "gas
chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which are either
still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn testimony to a Toronto
court and in a technical report, Leuchter described every aspect of his
investigation.

He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing facilities
could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among other things, he
pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were not properly sealed or
vented to kill human beings without also killing German camp personnel.
[20]

Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by the
Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that the
Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a careful
on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and
Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I have come to the
conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B
[hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider it absolutely
impossible." [21]
http://www.solargeneral.com/library/www.ihr.org/leaflets/auschwitz.html

since then and Israel consider Iraq an active threat even after it was
disarmed by the American
& British bombing for its military bases during the last decade .
Let the mind to be the judge... who threaten whom ?!
Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He studied
history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich,
Portland State University and Indiana University (M.A., 1977). For nine
years he served as editor of the IHR's Journal of Historical Review.
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/auschwitz.shtml
Open Society And Its Enemies - The Story Of Auschwitz
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=2726
Auschwitz: The Final Count
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=2709
The Diminishing Numbers of Alleged Dead in Auschwitz
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/print.php?id=156377
The Liberation of the Camps
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=55
A Factual Appriasal by the Red Cross
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=2735
Read the Red Cross reports. Go to the Red Cross museum, headquarters
in your city and pick up the records. Anyway theres a few independent
witnesses.
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndstats.html
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_international&Numbe
r=293321480
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735
http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm
Rassinier seems to wrap it up.
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the French
Resistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for various
activities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swiss
border. http://www.codoh.com/thoughtcrimes/PORT1RAS.HTML
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years
http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/lindbergh3.html
TERROR BOMBING
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain had given an assurance that:
'The British Government would never resort to the deliberate attack on women
and children and other civilians for the purpose of mere terrorism.'
However, his successor Winston Churchill appointed as his personal adviser
the Jew Professor Lindemann. Lindemann, later Lord Cherwell, suggested the
bombing of German cities and that working class areas were legitimate
targets, and from then onwards the last vestiges of civilised decency in
warfare were abandoned. These bombings began on 10 August 1940 with the
bombing of the small open town of Freiburg on the Swiss frontier.
Fifty-three civilians were killed, including twenty children playing in the
park. It was reported by Mr. Taylor of the American Red Cross in the New
York Times of 3 May 1940. This was before the Germans began bombing British
cities. Mr. J. M. Speight, CBE, Principal Secretary to the Air Ministry,
wrote in his book The Splendid Decision:
'Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets
reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets...
It gave Coventry, Birmingham, Sheffield and Southampton the right to look
Kiev, Kharkov, Stalingrad and Sebastopol in the face. Our Soviet allies
would have been less critical of our inactivity if they had understood what
we had done... Hitler would have been willing at my time to stop the
slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement
confining the action of aircraft to battle zones.'
http://www.heretical.com/

http://www.msnbc.com/news/606092.asp?0si=-&cp1=1
Who has said, America and Israel? I'll pick Israel every time. That is a guy
who was educated, worked in intelligence in the air force in America
ALIEN CONTROL
Is US like Germany of the '30s? Published on Friday, June 11, 2004 by the
Chicago Sun Times by Andrew Greeley
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-10.htm

The Daily Mail reported on 10 July 1933:
'The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its
alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty
times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before
the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves
into key positions in the German administrative machine.'
Resentment and resistance began to build up against the alien horde and in
the year before Adolf Hitler came to power Bernard Lecache, President of the
World Jewish League, stated:
'Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war
without mercy against her.'
On that same day, 24 March 1933, on the front page of the London Daily
Express appeared the main headlines: "Judaea declares war on Germany: Jews
of all the world unite", and followed with:
'The Israelite people of the entire world declare economic and financial war
on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany
revives the old war symbol of the Jews. Fourteen million Jews stand as one
body to declare war on Germany. The Jewish wholesale dealer leaves his
business, the banker his bank, the shopkeeper his shop, the beggar his
miserable hut in order to combine forces in the holy war against Hitler's
people.'
The German government was removing Jews from influential positions and
transferring power back to the German people. This declaration of war by the
Jews on Germany was repeated throughout the world. The first boycott of
Jewish business concerns came after this Jewish declaration of war in April
1933.


http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Holocaust/stlouis.html

http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/opposition/cannonfodder.htm
We implore and beseech our Jewish brethren to realize that the Zionists are
not the saviours of the Jewish People and guarantors of their safety, but
rather the instigators and original cause of Jewish suffering in the Holy
Land and worldwide.


http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html

The Zionist Federation of Germany (ZVfD), an organisation representing a
tiny minority of German Jews, was selected by the Nazis as the body to
represent the Jews of the Reich.
The best example of this was the 'Transfer Agreement' of 1934. Immediately
after the Nazi takeover in 1933, Jews all over the world supported or were
organising a world wide boycott of German goods. This campaign hurt the Nazi
regime and the German authorities searched frantically for a way disabling
the boycott. It was clear that if Jews and Jewish organisations were to pull
out, the campaign would collapse.
This problem was solved by the ZVfD. A letter sent to the Nazi party as
early as 21.6.33, outlined the degree of agreement that existed between the
two organisations on the questions of race, nation, and the nature of the
'Jewish problem', and it offered to collaborate with the new regime:

In their eagerness to gain credence and the backing of the new regime, the
Zionist organisation managed to undermine the boycott. The main public act
was the signature of the 'Transfer Agreement' with the Nazi authorities
during the Zionist Congress of 1934. In essence, the agreement was designed
to get Germany's Jews out of the country and into Mandate Palestine. It
provided a possibility for Jews to take a sizeable part of their property
out of the country, through a transfer of German goods to Palestine. This
right was denied to Jews leaving for any other destination (emphasis - ED).
The Zionist Organisation was the acting agent, through its financial
organisations. This agreement operated on a number of fronts 'helping' Jews
to leave the country, breaking the ring of the boycott, exporting German
goods in large quantities to Palestine, and last but not least, enabling the
regime to be seen as humane and reasonable even towards its avowed enemies,
the Jews. After all, they argued, the Jews do not belong in Europe and now
the Jews come and agree with them.

After news of the agreement broke, the boycott was doomed. If the Zionist
Organisation found it possible and necessary to deal with the Nazis, and
import their goods, who could argue for a boycott? This was not the first
time that the interests of both movements were presented to the German
public as complementary. Baron Von Mildenstein, the first head of the Jewish
Department of the SS, later followed by Eichmann, was invited to travel to
Palestine. This he did in early 1933, in the company of a Zionist leader,
Kurt Tuchler. Having spent six months in Palestine, he wrote a series of
favourable articles in Der Sturmer describing the 'new Jew' of Zionism, a
Jew Nazis could accept and understand.








The declared enemy was now right in the middle of their country. Bankers,
industrialists, media moguls, movie producers, merchants, and others,
overnight became enemies of Germany.
No nation in the world would have allowed their declared enemies to freely
roam around the country. The Germans, however, never implemented measures
against the Jews as drastic as the United States did with their Japanese
citizens.

http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.

thousands of Jews were not bothered by the Nazis or by the fate of their
"convicted" co-religionists. They went on with their daily lives in Germany
while the world was running amok about the "harsh treatment of Jews in
Germany." To illustrate the true "fate of the Jews," one has to look at some
of the prominent Jewish leaders living in Germany at the time.
These are very important questions, because so many prominent Jews survived
the alleged Holocaust. Simon Wiesenthal, Eli Wiesel, Leo Baeck, Max
Nussbaum, and so many more like them. As a matter of fact, approximately 4.5
million Jews "survived."

Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration
camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were
allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?


By all accounts, Rabbi Dr. Leo Baeck must have had a very comfortable
existence under the National Socialist Government in Germany. Born in 1873
in Posen, he became a Rabbi in 1897 in Oppeln/Silesia. Interestingly, he was
a Rabbi in Berlin from 1912 until 1943, when he himself was interned at the
Theresienstadt camp, a camp where most of the prominent Jews and resistance
activists were housed. After the war Leo Baeck immigrated to England.

Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration
camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were
allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?

Another question should be put to all those false Holocaust "experts" by
asking them how many Jews were gassed in Dachau? As a matter of fact, no one
was ever "gassed" in Germany, or in territories under German control, as has
been established in court


In Schuld und Schicksal (Guilt and Fate) Burg dealt with the Warsaw and Lodz
ghettos. When the German troops occupied Warsaw, they wanted to concentrate
the Jewish population. Real ghettos had been there for centuries but the
assimilated or emancipated Jews had lived far way from the ghettos. Now the
Germans wanted to have the Jews all together. In a practical sense, the
ghetto was also organized for the protection of the Jewish population.
(26-6885, 6886)
The Zionists were happy with this arrangement. An appointed Jewish Council
was the governing body of the ghetto. They had their own police, jails and
everything else. Naturally, there were some who were cruel. One of these was
the vice president of the police, who was later executed. In Burg's eyes,
this execution was evidence that Jews defended themselves against the
minority of Zionists who were using the majority of Jews for their own
purposes. (26-6886, 6887)

Then, when hundreds of thousands of civilians died in massive Allied bombing
raids against German civilians ... and only then ... Rabbi Baeck got out.
And where did he go? To Theresienstadt, because the concentration camp was
never bombed by the Allies, and was the safest place for a Jew to be.
Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration
camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were
allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/books/20040228-104600-5293r.htm
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618485406/102-0292101-9147327?v=glance&n=2
83155
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/samples/hm051/2003047896.html
Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945, they found 800 Jews
alive and well in Berlin's Jewish hospital.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/356
0175.stm

It must have been relatively easy to leave Germany. Max Nussbaum, Chief
Rabbi of Berlin until 1940 (who later became Chief Rabbi of Beverly Hills,
CA), immigrated to New York at the advice of Rabbi Stephen Wise. Did Rabbi
Wise already know of the coming war between the United States and Germany in
1940?
One must assume that Rabbi Baeck knew about Rabbi Nussbaum's plan to move to
New York, but again Baeck remained in Berlin. A riddle to be sure, unless
the horrors of Nazism were not that horrible for the Jews after all.
Ø > IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered
all
European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their
property
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine;<
YES THAT OFFER WAS MADE. THE JEWS CAN THANK THE ZIONISTS WHO DECLINED FOR
THEIR VARIOUS REASONS.
Under the guise of "love of Israel", the Zionist "statesmen" seduced many
Jews to replace devotion to the Torah and its Sages with devotion to the
scoundrel who founded Zionism
http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/tenquestions.htm
The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a German
offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the
other Jewish groups made no effort to influence the United States and the
32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German
and Austrian Jews.
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/Jews-who-helped-nazis-hit
ler.htm


AND YOU WERE IN SOMEONES ELSES COUNTRY INTERMARRIED AND ALL .
YOU HAD THE SAME FREEDOMS THAT YOU NOW ENJOY IN OUR WESTERN DEMOCRACIES, AND
SOME OF YOU TURNED ON THE PEOPLE AND COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE TO SHOW YOUR
SOLIDARITY WITH JEWS/ZIONISTS.

THERE WERE JEWS WHO WERE LOYAL GERMAN CITIZENS AND WORKED WITH THE GERMANS .

Jews in German army
http://judaism.about.com/b/a/039042.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/675641/posts
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/jewishnazi.html
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righitpix.html
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERmiltch.htm
http://www.jugendgeschichtswerkstatt.de/strassennamen/fliegerviertel/flieger
viertel.html
http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/gerjews.htm
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/00/03/NSJews.html
Here by a Munich-born historian saluting in moving detail a group of little
known
heroines - the women, nearly all of them German, who opposed Hitler both
before and, more dramatically, during the war.

http://www.new-books-in-german.com/aut2001/book05a.htm
http://www.adolfthegreat.com/

http://www.msnbc.com/news/606092.asp?0si=-&cp1=1
Who has said, America and Israel? I'll pick Israel every time. That is a guy
who was educated, worked in intelligence in the air force in America
ALIEN CONTROL
Is US like Germany of the '30s? Published on Friday, June 11, 2004 by the
Chicago Sun Times by Andrew Greeley
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-10.htm


The Daily Mail reported on 10 July 1933:
'The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its
alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty
times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before
the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves
into key positions in the German administrative machine.'
Resentment and resistance began to build up against the alien horde and in
the year before Adolf Hitler came to power Bernard Lecache, President of the
World Jewish League, stated:
'Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war
without mercy against her.'
On that same day, 24 March 1933, on the front page of the London Daily
Express appeared the main headlines: "Judaea declares war on Germany: Jews
of all the world unite", and followed with:
'The Israelite people of the entire world declare economic and financial war
on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany
revives the old war symbol of the Jews. Fourteen million Jews stand as one
body to declare war on Germany. The Jewish wholesale dealer leaves his
business, the banker his bank, the shopkeeper his shop, the beggar his
miserable hut in order to combine forces in the holy war against Hitler's
people.'
http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Palast.htm
The following disturbing essay describing how U.S. geopolitics is
subverted, and its military leaders openly co-opted by a foreign country
(Israel) is from the website of Israel Shamir, a Russian Jew
who broke with organized Zionism and who now "tells it like it is" about
Israel (which very un-politically-correct, of course) in widely-read columns
(www.israelshamir.net)

Following an incisive essay about Greg Palast, a "leftist" Jewish-American
writer who laughably maintains that the USA's Israel-First Jewish Lobby and
its operatives in the U.S. government and
corporate media had nothing to do with bringing about the invasion of Iraq
or the drumbeat for an attack against Israel's other major enemy,Iran.

Shamir, himself a descendent of rabbis, pointedly writes:

"I have no idea of Palast's ethnic background, but ideologically,nobody
can be more Judaic than this man ["leftist" Palast, who is, in fact,
Jewish], who worships money, despises the native and wishes to
bomb some place in the Middle East. These are classic Judaic attitudes,so I
was not surprised when Palast emerged as an apologist for the Jewsand an
accuser of greedy WASPs and Arabs. In his 'Was the Invasion of Iraq A
Jewish Conspiracy?' essay published in the Jewish 'progressive'
magazine Tikkun, Pallast pulls usual ropes; for him, whoever thinks that the
Jewish establishment pushed for the war on Iraq (including Mearsheimer and
Walt, apparently) must adhere to the Elders of Zion and Christ-killers
paradigm."

In the following the author discusses Israel's infiltration of the
profoundly compromised and corrupted mainstream U.S. media and high-level
military officers by pro-Israel interests.

"From Jim Dean

"The Jewish Lobby shills are fairly easy to spot in the media. All you
have to do is read about any major problem or controversy where certain
Jewish interests are obviously entwined, and these normally intelligent and
insightful journalists become instantly blind to it. No other issue makes
them instantly braindead.

"For the goyim journalist fear is a major component as they work in a
ghetto type environment when it comes to discussing Israel. And then of
course there is ignorance...no shortage of that around. And last, of
course...prejudice. But there is also the intelligence aspect of it.

"Intelligence agency infiltration of the media is an old old game but you
don't read hardly a word about it in investigative journalism. Our CIA, and
others, have done this for years and so has our wonderfully ally Israel
right here in the land of free speech.

"I am not saying that their shills are graduates of Mossad. That would be
more expensive. They are recruited like most are recruited, some for money
(career assistance) and some purely for ideological
reasons, most often a combination of the two. They got their hooks into the
early teleevangelist the same way. They were in a position to greatly assist
in building them up...as long as they had a good
understanding about a few things. There is one that we have who flew around
on an Israeli Gov. Leat jet for a couple of years.

"It's the perfect infiltration set up. You have protection of sources. And
you are somewhat protected yourself from FBI investigations. Once your
career is 'advanced' high enough (Judith Miller?) you can be a source for
leaks, and you can even reveal your sources to your Israeli handler if you
want to. They do require some payback for the career help they offer.

"They have a separate program for retiring US generals and flag officers
They screen them prior to retirement to determine who is likely to remain in
the public eye. They are approached about their
retirement plans and if they are subservient enough are offered help getting
some 'board directorships' or nice consulting positions 'for such a good
friend of Israel'. This is topped off with a five star deluxe trip to Israel
where they are wined and dined.

"There is a lot of beneath the surface revulsion to this going on by those
below that level of rank. Our top officers are being seduced into the Jewish
Lobby propaganda machine in what many tell me is a classic Intel
infiltration operation. Our own Intel people (the ones who are not
Israel-phobes) are just aghast at the proto dual citizenship compromising
that goes on. God only knows what they turn over to the Israelis, the doors
they open.

"One result of this is nary a critical word from our veteran organizations
regarding the most obvious Israeli security excesses, the biggest being the
massive Israeli Intel operations that have been
running here for decades. I hardly ever meet an military Intel person who is
not aware of this, and most all of them are completely complacent about it.
'Above my pay grade'...and 'that's really a
political issue' are the most common dodges that are trotted out about it.
They won't even discuss the USS Liberty. They just hang their heads in
shame.

"I have no specific information on Mr. Palast, but he is what we would
call in the Intel business 'a person of interest'. Now Judith Miller on the
other hand, she may be on their payroll. After all, she
was able to wiggle her way into the actual interrogations of some of addam
top Lts. while she went around with the Army WMD units in Iraq. My sources
told me this was unprecedented, having a journalist present in such
situations. Her DoD NeoCon buddies got her right in there. They
were there for each other and it wasn't a freak accident.

"And what other country do you think might have had an interest in knowing
what she learned in those interrogations...and quickly? Does anyone think
that her NeoCon buddies who got her on the inside were not getting detailed
reports of everything that she learned?

"This is called 'front door' espionage. No break ins are necessary. You
just make an appointment. The media refuses to cover this, and for very good
reason. They are involved. But when you think of how many Israeli spy
networks that US Intel broke up in the US last year...and the year before
that...and on and on...you can see how the midlevel people could have a
jaded attitude about the whole mess.

"It's a national disgrace.


"Jim Dean
"Heritage TV...Atlanta"

The victims were from Austria, Canada, China and Finland,
http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20060726-120144-9661r.htm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14029827/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205549,00.html

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=66512



<***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:***@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Ø The shooting of "Solidarity-with-Israel" jews in Seattle by a lone
American muslim engineer could be just the tip of the iceberg of the
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SEATTTLE_SHOOTING?SITE=7219&SECTION=H
OME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-07-28-20-03-32
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/279424_convert30ww.html
While an isolated incident the extreme nature of it indicates all is
not kosher below the 49th. A week or so earlier a caller to the Art
Bell all-night talk show (CoasttoCoast) displayed overwhelming
resignation about intense, widespread disdain for jews, something that
normally would be precluded by screeners on pro-Israeli mainstream
media. So the fact that all that Americans are getting for their
$3-billion-a-year annual gift to Israel is body bags of friends or
relatives along with many more cripples is not sitting well with
Americans with no Israeli interests.
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?service_ID=11
793
says Iraqis now see the American flag as a symbol of moral decadence.
Instead of symbolizing liberty, freedom and defence of human rights, US
flag is now associated with murder, rape, usurping human rights and
violating international laws, all resulting from Israeli agents and
lobbies taking political control of America for the defence of Israel.
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?service_id=11
774
talks about No More Democracy Promotion by US in Iraq. My "Good"
comment is about two-thirds of the way down but also see the
"Excellent" one from "MeAgain" who endores my contribution and reveals
even more than I did.
President Bush, instead of mending fences in South America and
improving trade and economic opportunities for Americans is forced by
AIPAC to spend all of his time supporting zionist terrorists who have
been stealing land from Palestinians and killing them, incurring the
wrath of Arabs throughtout the ME and the world. While
industrialization opportunties in Venezula should be the perview of
American entrapreneurs, this market is not being facilitated by Bush
http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-17/0607308736011541.htm
The launching of US military forces against against Iraq by Israeli
neocon agents in the Whitehouse and Pentagon may soon get legal
scrutiny in a British court where three of England's most senior judges
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/uk-court-to-test-legality-of-iraq-war/20
06/07/27/1153816320596.html
Families of British soldiers killed in Iraq asked for the court inquiry
using an EU right-to-life human rights convention.
A more ominous message is in a Herndon survey on Sorcha's somewhat
mystical What Does It Mean.com site which notes a dramatic trend in the
US and Germany: a developing wave of potentially violent anti-semitism.
The survey found jewish and Israeli organizations are in the process
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index938.htm
These events together with rumbling's in Blair's cabinet, US State's
denial that indecision in Rome "allowed" Israel to continue bombing
Lebanon, Israeli casualties, Russia not including Hizbollah and Hamas
on its list of (17) "terror" organizations, and more Arab states
condemning Israel's destruction of Lebanese infrastructure indicate
zionists would be better off at the negotiating table rather than the
battlefield, especially since the only purpose of Hizbollah's capture
of IDF soldiers was to get negotiations going to return their POW's
Tatarewicz
Lindberg kidnapping Zionist Helter Skelter.

Many writers and the FBI have connected Albert Einstein to the lindberg
kidnapping.
The evidence is sound, but charges have not stuck, because there appears
to be no motive.

Lindberg was an American hero, Idolized by Hitler. who was hated by
Zionists. for his victory over Communism.
Stakes were very high in 1932, the time of the kidnapping. International
Communism was loosing ground, After Hitler kicked the Communists out of
Germany.

Americans hated Communism as much as the Germans. In order to turn the
Country against Hitler. The Zionists in America started a helter skelter
operation . in order to push Hitler into striking back at the Jews in
Germany.

Charles Manson believed he could start a race war between Blacks and
Whites by murdering several White celebrities. His operation was coded
helter skelter.

Helter skelter was nothing new, England use the same tactic to divide
America before the Civil War. with the anti-slavery movement.

America hated Communism, Hitler was destroying Communism, but Americans
spirituality was based on freedom for persecuted minorities..

By turning Hitler against Jews, Zionists hoped to increase Communist
influence in America. And use the US in fighting wars in Europe, against
the Catholic powers.

1 th 5;3''Then when they say ''peace and safety'' sudden destruction
will come upon them'' as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they shall
not escape''

When the UN takes control of the border of Israel and Lebanon Israel
will say ''peace and safety'' then 1th 5;3'' WILL BE FULFILED.
Qana Massacre II
30 July 2006
55 Civilians massacred including 27 children in a shelter (Early reports)
Qana is the place where, according to the Fourth Gospel, Jesus performed his
first miracle, the turning of a large quantity of water into wine at a
wedding feast (John 2:1-11) http://www.fromisraeltolebanon.info/
Ø
No coverage of the following either in the Jewish controlled/influenced
SNIP
No doubt due to the total control of the media by the Evil Jewish
Bankers (tm)
http://www.oicu2.com/afc/letter.html
http://www.hoffman-info.com/communist.html
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html

In Russia, 100,000,000 bourgeousie were exterminated. None of them were
Jews. All were Christians. Most of the generals in charge of these
anti-Christian pogroms were Jews. Stalin considered Jews to be the only
real communists that could be trusted.

Here is some background:

Bolshevik State. . . there were in 1918-1919, 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians,
11 Armenians, 35 Letts,15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3
Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.

Concerning the Jews and communism:

In 1907, May 13 thru June 1, a fifth Congress of the Russian Social
Democratic Labor Party was held, this time in London. This was the last
one held before the 1917 revolution in Czarist Russia. Present:

The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin---91 delegates The Mensheviks, led by
Martov and Dan (JEWS)---89 delegates The Polish Social Democrats, led by
Rosa Luxemborg(JEW)---44 delegates The Jewish Bund, led by Rafael
Abramovitch and M.I. Lieber(JEWS)---55 delegates. The Lettish Social
Democrats, led by "Comrade Herman" Danishevsky(JEW)

Lenin appeared on the scene, after an absence of nine years (Encyc.
Brit., Vol. XIII, p. 912). The Germans, not realizing that he would be
anything more than a trouble maker for their World War I enemy, Russia,
passed him and his party (exact number disputed -- about 200?) In a
sealed train from Switzerland to the Russian border. In Lenin's sealed
train, "Out of a list of 165 names published, 23 are Russian, 3
Georgian, 4 Armenian, 1 German, and 128 Jewish" (The Surrender of an
Empire, Nesta H. Webster, Boswell Printing and Publishing Company, Ltd.,
10 Essex St., London, W.C.2, 1931, p. 77). "At about the same time,
Trotsky arrived from the United States, followed by over 300 Jews from
the East End of New York and joined up with the Bolshevik Party" (op.
cit., p. 73).

Thus under Lenin, whose birth-name was Ulianov and whose racial
antecedents are uncertain, and under Leon Trotsky, a Jew, whose birth
-name was Bronstein, a small number of highly trained Jews from abroad,
along with Russian Judaized Khazan and non-Jewish captives to the
Marxian ideology, were able to make themselves masters of Russia.
"Individual revolutionary leaders and Sverdlov -- played a conspicuous
part in the revolution of November, 1917, which enabled the Bolshevists
to take possession of the state apparatus" (Univ. Jew. Encyd., Vol. IX,
p.668). Here and there in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia other Jews
are named as co-founders of Russian Communism, but not Lenin and Stalin.
Both of these, however, are said by some writers to be half-Jewish.
Whatever the racial antecedents of their top man, the first Soviet
commissariats were largely staffed with Jews. The Jewish position in the
Communist movement was well understood in Russia. "The White Armies
which opposed the Bolslshvik government linked Jews and Bolsheviks as
common enemies" (Univ. Jew Encyc., Vol. I, p. 336).


According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556
important functionaries of the Bolshevik State. . . there were in
1918-1919, 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15
Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457
Jews.
If you ever wanted to know exactly who in the communist party was Jewish
and what he did to kill Christians during the Red Years in which more
than 100 million Christians were killed, well, this may be the place.
Politically incorrect, but informative as heck. Try it if it is your cup
of historical tea, or trash it. The website where I found this is listed
below and has photos as well.

1997 Michael A. Hoffman II's Campaign for Radical Truth in History

Jewish Communists: The Documentary Record


http://www.hoffman-info.com/communist.html
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html

The Prop-Masters
Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia transform themselves
into "survivors" of a holocaust.
The portraits at left are of the same man but in two different incarnations.
On the far left we see Martin "Gray" in retirement after a successful career
peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market
paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits as a saintly
"Holocaust Survivor" who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of
the Treblinka "gas chamber." The earlier portrait is of the youthful Gray as
a highly-decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the savage forerunner of the
KGB), responsible for the murder of millions of Christians in Russia and
Eastern Europe. Even Establishment researchers have had to admit that Gray's
book is as phony as the antiques he peddled.



The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of
terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has
been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this
madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the
German people.

Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed
after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime
punishable by death. (Izvestia, July 27, 1918).

The top Communist Jewish official Zinoviev stated: "Without mercy,
without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let
them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the
blood of Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Volodarsky, let there be floods
of the blood of the bourgeoisie--more blood! As much as
possible!"(Krasnaya Gazeta, Sept. 1, 1918).



The Jewish Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest
control. Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant "bourgeoisie" was
their prime motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian
peasantry of Russia as so many vermin, beginning with Lenin's attack on
them in the summer of 1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been
almost completely ignored in Western history.

The Siberian novelist Valentin Rasputin wrote in 1990: "I think today
the Jews here in Russia should feel responsible for the sin of having
carried out the revolution and for the shape it took. They should feel
responsible for the terror--for the terror that existed during the
revolution and especially after the revolution...their guilt is great.
They perpetrated the relentless campaign against the peasant class whose
land was brutally expropriated by the state and who themselves were
ruthlessly murdered."

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's biographer recounts what it was like to grow up
as a Russian Christian child among the children of the Jewish communist
elite: "By the age of ten he had the cross ripped from his neck by
jeering Pioneers and for over a year was held up to ridicule...
Solzhenitsyn was, as a boy, exposed to students whose parents had an
officially superior status. Most of the members of the Young Pioneers
and Komsomol movements, at least in Rostov, were Jewish
children..."(Michael Scammell, Solzhenitsyn:A Biography, p. 64).


Here is the most genocidal political movement in world history, which
created the largest concentration camps and the most horrendous slave
labor system of the 20th century, in which millions of Christians were
slaughtered (on the size of the Gulag concentration camp system cf. C.
Andrew and O. Gordievsky, KGB: The Inside Story and N.Y. Times, Oct. 22,
1990, p. 82. None of these camps are being preserved for posterity. Most
were destroyed long ago by special military brigades; cf. Michael
Specter, "Cold Reminder," N.Y. Times, Dec. 3, 1994).

This was a movement staffed in its upper echelons by Jewish Communists
and yet the world is comparatively silent about the holocaust and war
crimes this thoroughly kosher system inflicted and the identity of the
persons who were its architects.

Auschwitz is on the tip of every tongue but who has heard of Kolyma,
Magadan, the Solovetsky islands and the other infernal Soviet centers of
human destruction in eastern Siberia? Who has seen films and books about
the millions of human beings worked, frozen and starved to death in the
construction of the White Sea-Baltic Canal, over which stood a
triumphant, colossal statue of the Jewish communist mass murderer
Genrikh Yagoda?

America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust memory is now a
$100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which is government-funded." (
Balaam's Curse, p. 228)

This is why Edgar Bronfman, the billionaire Canadian Seagram's whiskey
merchant and chairman of the powerful World Jewish Congress says, "The
growing numbers of revisionist supporters cannot be ignored. We must use
every resource to stop revisionism now, before it's too late."

The reason it must be stopped is because revisionism is the only force
preventing the holy people from finishing the job they started in Russia
and Bavaria, only this time they are using intellectual means to achieve
the same end.

Consider the fact that the people who bear the brunt of contemporary
Jewish racist hatred and invective, the Germans, have among the lowest
birthrates and the highest abortion rates of any nation in the world.
Far more Germans die every year than are born.


Only in such a profoundly falsified world soaked in fraud could the
international media sit by, uninterested, as the great-great grandson of
the blood-drenched Jewish Red Army commander Leon Trotsky, David
Axelrod, shot to death an elderly Palestinian couple in November of
1990, as part of an Israeli, "Kach" terror group raid.


But imagine--if you can--the hubbub if a grandson of a Nazi war criminal
had shot a Turkish couple in Germany. The weeping, wailing and
never-ending references to "Never Forget" and "lessons of history" would
seep out of the collective TV sets of the earth like waste from a toxic
septic tank, because what is clear from such a double standard is that
the true lessons of history are not being learned and recollection
itself is hostage to the diorama of Zionist monomania.

Sixteen million ethnic Germans were forcibly expelled from Silesia,
Moravia and the Volga regions of the eastern territories at the end of
the Second World War. On this trail of tears, two million perished--shot
to death, starved, raped and beaten. Ask one in one thousand, one in ten
thousand people on the street today-- "Have you heard?" The answer will
be no.

The Steven Spielberg movie images of cattle cars jammed with human cargo
are reserved for Jewish victims alone. The 800,000 mostly Muslim
Chechens deported by Jewish commissars and savagely stuffed into railway
cars to Kazakhstan, where a quarter of a million died enroute, do not
meet Hollywood's standard of cinematic focus.

The Soviet cattle car deportations afflicted more than a half-million
Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Christians who were shipped to the
Gulag. 12% of the entire Baltic population was either deported to
Siberia or executed by the Jewish Soviet Secret Police. Who knows of
it? Who cares? Who tries to keep this history from repeating? Instead, in
1995 the president of Lithuania made a pilgrimage to the Israeli gas
chamber shrine at Yad Vashem to grovel and beg "forgiveness" for his
people who were the victims of the Jewish Communist murderers. To seek
forgiveness in all humility is ordained when it is predicated on the
truth. To do so based on false witness in order to idolize the Pharisees
is a mockery of justice.

In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet
communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of
the total population (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

The following is a list of some top Jewish Communist murderers,
commissars, spies, assassins and propagandists (aliases are listed in
parentheses). This list is by no means comprehensive. To catalog all of
the Jewish communists involved in crimes would require hundreds of
pages.


Jewish Communists

V.I. Lenin, supreme dictator. Leon Bronstein (Trotsky): supreme
commander of the Soviet Red Army. Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev):
executive, Soviet Secret Police. Solomon Lozovsky: deputy Soviet foreign
minister. Maxim Wallach (Litvinov): Soviet foreign minister. Yuri
Andropov: director, Soviet KGB, later supreme dictator of the Soviet
Union.

Jacob Sverdlov: first president of the Soviet Union. Sverdlov ordered
the massacre of the Czar's family--women and children--in the town named
after Catherine the Great, Yekaterinburg, (renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in
honor of the murderer).

Jacob Yurovsky: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Yurovsky led the death
squad which carried out Sverdlov's order for the murder of the Czar's
family, including the bayoneting to death of the Czar's daughters. The
Ipatyev house, where, in the basement, the massacre had occurred, stood
intact until 1977, when the local Communist party boss at that time,
Boris Yeltsin, ordered it demolished, lest it become a shrine to
anti-Jewish sentiment.

Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (pictured at left): chief mass murderer for
Stalin, ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of
Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral of
Christ the Savior. Standing amid the rubble of the cathedral, Kaganovich
proclaimed, "Mother Russia is cast down. We have ripped away her
skirts." (N.Y. Times, Sept. 26, 1995).

Mikhail Kaganovich: deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of
slave labor, brother of Lazar. Rosa Kaganovich: Stalin's mistress;
sister of Lazar. Paulina Zhemchuzina: member of the Central Committee
and wife of Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov. Olga Bronstein: officer,
Soviet Cheka Secret Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.

Genrikh Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer
extraordinaire. (Jewish poet Romain Rolland, winner of the Nobel Prize,
wrote a hymn of praise to Yagoda).

Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag death camp
system.

Lev Inzhir, commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration.
Boris Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother
of Matvei. K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police.

Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk: commissars of death camps and slave
labor, supervised the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of
the White Sea--Baltic Canal.

M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Slutsky and Shpiegelglas:
commanders, Soviet Secret Police. Isaac Babel: officer, Soviet Secret
Police.

Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army;
officer, Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in
the Spanish Civil War. He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests
and peasants in Spain.

Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee.
Dimitri Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army. Yakov ("Yankel") Kreiser:
general, Soviet Red Army. Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.

David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union.
Grigori Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army. Mikhail Chazkelevich: general,
Soviet Red Army. Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army. Arseni
Raskin: deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army. Haim Fomin, commander of
Brest-Litovsk, Soviet Red Army. At least one hundred Soviet generals
were Jewish (cf. Canadian Jewish News, April 19, 1989).

Generals who were not themselves Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among
these were Marshal Voroshilov, Marshal Bulganin, Marshal Peresypkin and
General Pavel Sudoplatov (Sudoplatov assassinated hundreds of Christian
leaders including Ukranian Catholic Archbishop Teodor Romzha). This
Jewish wife "insurance policy" extended to Politburo members such as
Andrei Andreyev and Leonoid Brezhnev.

Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted
Christian peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The
kulaks were subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein's Bezhin
Meadow).

KOMZET: commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on land
seized from murdered Christians in Ukraine; funded by Jewish-American
financier Julius Rosenwald.

Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of
anti-German hate material dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg instigated
the Soviet Red Army rape and murder of German civilians. Referring to
German women, Ehrenburg gloated to the advancing Red Army troops, "that
blonde hag is in for a bad time."

In a leaflet addressed to Soviet troops, Ehrenburg wrote: "...the
Germans are not human beings...nothing gives us so much joy as German
corpses."(Anatol Goldberg, Ilya Ehrenburg, p. 197). Goldberg concedes
that Ehrenburg, "...had always disliked the Germans...now that there was
a war on he turned his old prejudice into an asset."(Ibid., p. 193).

Another publication distributed to the Red Army, this time as the
soldiers approached Danzig, was described by a historian: "Millions of
leaflets were air-dropped on the troops with a message composed by the
propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg and signed by Stalin: 'Soldiers of the Red
Army! Kill the Germans! Kill all Germans! Kill! Kill! Kill!"
(Christopher Duffy, Red Storm on the Reich).

The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the
extermination of the entire German people (cf. Pravda, April 14, 1945.
[Pravda was also published in a Yiddish edition, Einikeyt). Ehrenburg
won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize. He willed his papers to the
Israeli Yad Vashem 'Holocaust' Museum.

Solomon Mikhoels: commissar of Soviet propaganda. Soviet film
propagandists: Mark Donsky, Leonid Lukov, Yuli Reisman, Vasily
Grossman,Yevgeny Gabrilovich, Boris Volchok and Lillian Hellman (old
movies written by her continue to be broadcast on American telelvision

The Jews and Bolshevism

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-USSRchristians-usexpeditionaryforces.ht
ml

One of the most hushed-up facts concerning the so-called "Russian
Revolution" of 1917 is that Jews constituted the overwhelming majority of
the Bolshevik leadership. While the Jews, and those sympathetic to them,
continue to condemn anyone as "anti-Semitic" who brings up these facts, it
remains undeniable that communism was both a Jewish created and lead
revolutionary movement.

First, it is a well known fact that the father of communism, Karl Marx, was
a Jew and descended from long list of rabbis on his father's side. Whether
he was a "religious" Jew is of no significant importance, since Jewishness
is not defined exclusively by adherence to Judaism. A great bulk of Jews
today would probably identify themselves as atheists, but also nonetheless
consider themselves Jews.

While some persons, who deny Jewish involvement in communism, will concede
that Marx was indeed Jewish, let's see the them deny the communist-Jewish
connection as clearly exposed in diplomatic cables that passed between
American representatives in Russia and Washington D.C. during the time of
the Bolshevik take-over of Russia. The following quotes are taken directly
from documents available from the U.S. Archives: State Department document
861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul general in Moscow, Summers:
"Jews prominent in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing
among population...." State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from
Vladivostok on July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of
Soviet government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."

From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on March
1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt. Montgomey
Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but
the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's beginning guided and
controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type." A second Schuyler
telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok, reports on the make-up of the
presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here were 384 `commissars' including 2
Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of
the latter number, 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the
downfall of the Imperial Government."

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading
Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. (Lenin has since
been discovered by a former Soviet general, who had access to the KGB
archives, that Lenin was at least 25% Jewish!) Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein)
headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs.
Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's executive secretary
and - as chairman of the Central Executive Committee - head of the Soviet
government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist
International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in
foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek
(Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev
(Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January
1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are
Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or
any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a
worldwide social revolution."

The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this: "Unless
Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one
form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and
worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy
for their own ends the existing order of things."

In case anyone thinks I've taken a few selected quotes out-of-context,
here's three paragraphs from Dr. George A. Simons, a former superintendent
of the Methodist Missions in Russia, Bolshevik Propaganda Hearing Before the
Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 65th
Congress:

"We were told that hundreds of agitators had followed in the trail of
Trotsky (Bronstein) these men having come over from the lower east side of
New York. Some of them when they learned that I was the American Pastor in
Petrograd, stepped up to me and seemed very much pleased that there was
somebody who could speak English, and their broken English showed that they
had not qualified as being Americas. A number of these men called on me and
were impressed with the strange Yiddish element in this thing right from the
beginning, and it soon became evident that more than half the agitators in
the so-called Bolshevik movement were Jews...I have a firm conviction that
this thing is Yiddish, and that one of its bases is found in the east side
of New York...The latest startling information, given me by someone with
good authority, startling information, is this, that in December, 1918, in
the northern community of Petrograd that is what they call the section of
the Soviet regime under the Presidency of the man known as Apfelbaum
(Zinovieff) out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be real Russians, with
the exception of one man, a Negro from America who calls himself Professor
Gordon.

I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly after the great revolution
of the winter of 1917, there were scores of Jews standing on the benches and
soap boxes, talking until their mouths frothed, and I often remarked to my
sister, 'Well, what are we coming to anyway. This all looks so Yiddish.' Up
to that time we had see very few Jews, because there was, as you know, a
restriction against having Jews in Petrograd, but after the revolution they
swarmed in there and most of the agitators were Jews.

I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came into power all over
Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big
posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very evident that now that was
to be one of the great languages of Russia; and the real Russians did not
take kindly to it."

Some might automatically assume that the preceding sources are
"anti-Semitic" and therefore unreliable, but they'd be wrong. Here's a few
Jewish sources that essentially substantiate the previous ones:

"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish
dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in
the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to
Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning,
shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a
reality all over the world." (The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920)

"There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many
Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of
the highest ideals of Judaism." (Jewish Chronicle, London April, 4, 1919)
"Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism." (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S.
Wise, May 5, 1935).

"In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet communist
party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of the total
population." (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make so-called
"anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin himself:

"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme
form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

While Christian churches across Russia were being destroyed and clergymen
murdered by Communist gangs, synagogues and rabbis were left virtually
untouched.

It was during this time that Bolshevik Commissars (many of them Jews)
conducted a horrendous reign of terror against the non-Jewish Russian
population. In one case alone, they deliberately starved to death 20 million
Ukrainian farmers during the 1920's in one of the most vile campaigns in
history: In (the) Ukraine, "Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the
rank-and-file Cheka agents," reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor
of Russian history. . . "

Some modern historians estimate that upwards of 85-110 million persons were
murdered in the 70 years of communist rule in Russia, many of them directly
at the hands of Jews, and even more at the order of Jewish Communist bosses.

Jews and Bolshevism

Amongst themselves, the Jews are quite candid about their sympathy for and
involvement in Bolshevism.

On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: "There is much in the fact of
Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the
fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the
finest ideals of Judaism."
(Perhaps this explains why the Red Army uses a Jewish star as its symbol?)

Probably the best-known exposé of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik coup
d'état was by Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated Sunday
Herald of 8 February 1920. Churchill wrote "With the notable exception of
Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover the principal
inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish leaders."

Communism was of course founded by Karl Marx whose grandfather was a rabbi
by the name of Mordeccai. Marx was given his initial encouragement by a
Communist-Zionist by the name of Moses Hess. As founder and editor of the
Rheinische Zeitung, the main organ of leftist thought in Germany, he
provided Karl Marx with his first important platform. Later, in Brussels, he
collaborated with Marx on The German Ideology. It was Hess too who converted
to Communism Friedrich Engels, the wealthy textiles magnate who later
subsidised Marx from the profits of sweated labour in Britain and Germany.

When the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in
Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish coup
d'état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real name
Bronstein. He had been married by a rabbi in 1900, and whilst in exile in
New York he had worked for Novy Mir, described in the Church Times (23
January 1925) as a "Yiddish newspaper."

The various reporters and diplomats who were there at the time of the
"Revolution" have given evidence as to its Jewish nature.

The widow of the Guardian's correspondent Mrs. Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams
wrote: "In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries were
filled with Jews."

The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik
'revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The
Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, Les Derniers Jours des
Romanofs, which gave the racial background of all the members of the Soviet
government. (This does not appear in the later English translation, for some
odd reason.) After the publication of this monumental work, Wilton was
ostracised by the press, and he died in poverty in 1925. He reported that
the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:

NAME NATIONALITY
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Lourie (Larine) Jew
Ouritski Jew
Volodarski Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Krylenko Russian
Lounatcharski Russian


"The Council of the People's Commissars comprises the following:

MINISTRY NAME NATIONALITY
President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
Food Schlichter Jew
Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
State Control Lander Jew
State Lands Kauffman Jew
Works V. Schmidt Jew
Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
Religions Spitzberg Jew
Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Hygiene Anvelt Jew
Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
Press Volodarski Jew
Elections Ouritski Jew
Justice I. Steinberg Jew
Refugees Fenigstein Jew
Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew


"The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:

NAME NATIONALITY
Sverdlov (president) Jew
Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
Bruno Lett
Babtchinski Jew
Bukharin Russian
Weinberg Jew
Gailiss Jew
Ganzburg Jew
Danichevski Jew
Starck German
Sachs Jew
Scheinmann Jew
Erdling Jew
Landauer Jew
Linder Jew
Wolach Czech
Dimanstein Jew
Encukidze Georgian
Ermann Jew
Joffe Jew
Karkline Jew
Knigissen Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Krylenko Russian
KrassikofSachs Jew
Kaprik Jew
Kaoul Lett
Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
Latsis Jew
Lander Jew
Lounatcharski Russian
Peterson Lett
Peters Lett
Roudzoutas Jew
Rosine Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Stoutchka Lett
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Sosnovski Jew
Skrytnik Jew
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Teodorovitch Jew
Terian Armenian
Ouritski Jew
Telechkine Russian
Feldmann Jew
Froumkine Jew
Souriupa Ukranian
Tchavtchevadze Georgian
Scheikmann Jew
Rosental Jew
Achkinazi Imeretian
Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
Rose Jew
Sobelson (Radek) Jew
Sclichter Jew
Schikolini Jew
Chklianski Jew
Levine (Pravdine) Jew


"The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of
Moscow:

NAME NATIONALITY
Dzerjinski (president) Pole
Peters (vice-president) Lett
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jewess
Karlson Lett
Schaumann Jew
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Glaperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Latzis Lett
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Lett
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlof Jew
Biesenski Jew
Blioumkine Jew
Alexandrevitch Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Lett
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Lett
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Lett

Although Lenin is described as a "Russian," in fact he was a mixture of
various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter Russian,
one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least one-quarter Kalmuck
(Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol appearance. Various authorities
allege that his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya was a Jewess and that her family
spoke Yiddish in the home.

A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke, the Dutch
consul in St. Petersburg, said that "Bolshevism is organised and worked by
Jews." The report was included in a pamphlet published as a government White
Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia No. 1 (1919) A Collection of Reports on
Bolshevism in Russia. However, the pamphlet was quickly withdrawn and
reissued with various excisions and alterations made.

In the War Records Division of the United States National Archives there is
filed a report from an American Intelligence operative in St. Petersburg.
Under Record Group 20; Records of the American Expeditionary Forces Capt.
Montgomery Schuyler, G2 Intelligence wrote, "The Bolshevik movement is and
has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the
greasiest type."

Also in the U.S. National Archives are two telegrams sent by American
diplomats in Russia. State Department document 861.00/1757 sent on 2 May
1918 by U.S. Consul Summers in Moscow relates, "Jews predominant in local
Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population." Document
861.00/2205 from Consul Caldwell in Vladivostock on 5 July 1918 describes,
"Fifty per cent of Soviet government in each town consists of Jews of worst
type."

In January, 1924, Lenin died from causes variously described as 'a heart
attack,' brain hemorrhage' and 'syphilis.' His comrades immediately began
fighting amongst themselves to see who was to become his successor.

A relative outsider, Joseph Stalin, came to the fore and purged all
competition either by exiling or executing them. Since Stalin was not
Jewish, yet nearly all his opponents were, it is often suggested that Stalin
was anti-Semitic. This is far from the truth.

Stalin had three wives, all of them Jewesses. The first was Ekaterina
Svanidze who bore him one son, Jacob. His second wife was Kadya Allevijah.
She bore him a son Vassili and a daughter Svetlana. His second wife died in
mysterious circumstances, either by committing suicide or murdered by
Stalin. His third wife was Rosa Kaganovich, the sister of Lazar Kaganovich,
the head of Soviet industry. Stalin's daughter (who in 1967 fled to the USA)
then married Lazar's son Mihail i.e. her step-mother's nephew. Svetlana
Stalin had a total of four husbands, three of them Jewish.

Stalin's vice-president Molotov was also married to a Jewess, whose brother,
Sam Karp, runs an export business in Connecticut. Just to complicate things
even more, the Molotov's (half-Jewish) daughter also called Svetlana was
engaged to be married to Stalin's son Vassili.

After the death of Stalin, his successors kept up the tradition, for a
report in the B'nai B'rith Messenger relates: "To show that Russia treats
its Jews well, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev this week remarked at a
reception at the Polish Embassy that not only he himself and Soviet
President Klementi Voroshilov, but also half the members of the Praesidium
have Jewish wives. Mr. Kruschev made this remark to Israeli Ambassador
Joseph Avidar, who was amongst the guests." (Kruschev's wife was yet another
Kaganovitch.)

According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November 1964 the
present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess, and his children
are brought up as Jews. There are a number of prominent Jews in the Soviet
government, including Dimitri Dymshits in charge of industry, Lev Shapiro
regional secretary of Birobidjan, and Yuri Andropov in charge of the secret
police, the KGB. In fact, every secret police chief in Soviet history has
been a Jew, from the first Uritsky to the most recent, the murderous Beria.
A Jew is also in charge of the Soviet economy - Leonid Kantorovich.

It is a well-known fact that the Bolsheviks were and are financed by Jewish
interests in the West.

At a Bolshevik celebration rally in New York's Carnegie Hall on the night of
23 March 1917, a telegram of support from Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co.
was read out. The telegram was reprinted in the next morning's New York
Times. Schiff later tried to deny his involvement, but thirty years later
his grandson John admitted in the New York Journal-American (3 February
1949) that the old man had sunk twenty million dollars into the Bolshevik
cause.

Another Western bankers who poured funds into Bolshevik Russia was Olaf
Ashberg of the Stockholm Nia Banken. He remained the Soviets' paymaster
until the late 1940s. The London Evening Standard of 6 September 1948
reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland "for secret meetings with Swiss
government officials and banking executives. Diplomatic circles describe Mr.
Ashberg as the 'Soviet banker' who advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky
in 1917. At the time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to
form and equip the first unit of the Red Army."

The Bolsheviks also received assistance from Armand Hammer, who still
commutes back and forward between New York and Moscow to take care of his
business interests in both communities. Hammer's Occidental Oil Company is
at the moment building a 1600 mile chemicals pipeline in southern Russia. He
is also on such good terms with the Soviets that he personally arranges for
Soviet art galleries to lend paintings to America.

Another American-based businessman to help out the Soviet economy is Michael

Fribourg, who owns the massive Continental Grain Company. Together with the
Louis Dreyfus Corporation, these Jewish speculators were able to buy up vast
quantities of cheap American grain in 1972, sell it to the Soviets at a vast
profit, and collect an export subsidy from the U.S. taxpayer.

In every other East European country, it is exactly the same story:

In Hungary a Communist revolution was staged in 1919, instigated by the Jew
Bela Kun (Cohen). During the three month regime, the country was turned
upside down in a reign of murder and terror. Here again, the government was
composed almost entirely of Jews. And it was this factor which brought about
the regime's downfall, as the ordinary Hungarians detested Jewish
dictatorship. Kun was deposed and fled to the Soviet Union, where he became
chief of the secret police, the Cheka, in southern Russia.

It was not until 1945 that the Jews were able to regain control. Three
Russian Jews were installed as the ruling triumvirate, Matyas Rakosi
(Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer) and Zoltan Vas. Both Rakosi and Gero had
been members of Kun's bloody government.

In Germany, the Jews also tried to take over there in the chaos that
followed the First World War. Aided by funds from the Soviet Ambassador
Joffe, Rosa Luxemburg's Spartacus Bund attempted to overthrow the
government. The revolt was quelled and its leaders Luxemburg and Karl
Liebknecht executed.
The post-war dictator of Roumania, Anna Pauker, was the daughter of a
Bucharest kosher butcher. For a time she earned her living teaching Hebrew.
her father and brother now live in Israel.

Although Tito was the only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron Curtain in
the late 1940s, he was tutored by the Jew Mosa Pijade. According to John
Gunther in Behind the Iron Curtain, "He is Tito's mentor... Whatever
ideological structure Tito may have, he got it from the shrewd old man."
Moscow's puppet government in Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s was run by
another Jew, Rudolph Slansky.

In Poland too, Jews occupied virtually every position of authority in the
post-war Communist regime. Prominent among these were Minc, Skryesewski,
Modzelewski and Berman. Jacob Berman gradually eclipsed the others until he
became supreme dictator by himself. Also, Gomulka's wife was a Jewess.
Even in China, Soviet Jews were at work helping Mao Tse Tung. High up in the
Political Department of the Red Army in China were W. N. Levitschev and J.
B. Gamarnik.

From Let My People Go, Empirical Publications, Northern Ireland c. 1976.
Authorship unknown. Names of Jews are shown in bold face throughout the
publication.

The Prop-Masters
Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia transform themselves
into "survivors" of "the Holocaust"

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html

The portraits above are of the same man but in two different incarnations.
On the left we see Martin "Gray" in retirement after a successful career
peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market
paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits as a saintly
"Holocaust Survivor" who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of
the Treblinka "gas chamber." The earlier portrait on the right is of the
youthful Gray as a decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the forerunner of
the KGB), responsible for the murder of millions of Christians and gentiles
in Russia and Eastern Europe. Even Establishment researchers have had to
admit that Gray's book is as phony as the antiques he peddled. But Gray's
scam is symbolic of countless other Communist ghouls who have managed to
land on their feet in the West, disguised as poor, persecuted "Survivors of
the Holocaust" and feted as the saints and martyrs of the universe.
Meanwhile the holocaust they perpetrated against millions of Christians
slips further down the dark environs of Orwell's memory hole.

In chapter 13 of Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist, Dickens notes that Fagin has

an inexhaustible supply of props and disguises.

Judaic Communists: The Documentary Record
by Michael A. Hoffman II
Copyright 2006. All Rights Reserved

"The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and
Hiss...Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us."

Statement of President Richard Nixon in 1971, as recorded at the White House
on tape and released by the National Archives in 1999. The reference is to
Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss. (Sources: N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and
Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

"It is legitimate to adopt a critical attitude toward the relatively large
number of Jews who particularly in the first decade after the Bolshevik
revolution collaborated with the Soviet Government in the persecution of
other peoples."

Statement of researcher Michael Mills, an official of the government of
Australia at Canberra. (Source: Forward, March 10, 2000)

Judaic Professor Arno Mayer of Princeton in his important book, Why Did the
Heavens Not Darken? states that the German invasion of Russia was carried
out with the intention to eradicate Bolshevik (Soviet Communist) ideology.
The Germans were hardly the only ones in the West to believe that, "Soviet
Russia is a dictatorship of Jewry."

On Feb. 8, 1920 a young British writer made a similar observation in the
Illustrated Sunday Herald:

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of
Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by
these international and for the most part atheistical Jews."

The writer was Winston Churchill. Though he would later sell his soul for
considerably more than thirty pieces of silver, his analysis of the
authentic nature of Soviet communism remains trenchant.

Churchill expressed the crucial insight that the crimes perpetrated by
Jewish communists against Germans and Russians instilled in those people a
desire for retribution:

"In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more
astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed, the principal, part in the
system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating
Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by
Jewesses.

"The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror
during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been
presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has
been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people.

"...The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of
worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has
tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with villainies
which are now being perpetrated...Needless to say, the most intense passions
of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people." (End
quote from Churchill).

"...a letter sent to the Vatican by Pius XII in 1919, when he was Bishop
Eugenio Pacelli and papal nuncio in Munich...reports on his deputy's
unpleasant encounter with Bolshevik revolutionaries who were then
terrorizing Catholic priests and the German bourgeoisie. The letter
describes the leader, Max Lieven as a '... Russian and a Jew.' The letter
also describes Mr. Lieven's companions, '...Jews like the rest of
them.'...Bishop Pacelli's description of Jewish Communists...was hardly
uncommon 80 years ago." (N.Y. Times, Nov. 3, 1999).

Chaim Bermant, writing in the Jewish Chronicle (Aug. 30, 1991), says: "It
was Communism which toppled the hated Czars, Communism which removed Jewish
disabilities and proscribed anti-Semitism and Communism which, in its early
days at least, opened the doors to Jewish advancement."

Lenin, whose maternal grandfather, Israel Blank, was Judaic, said that
Judaics made the best revolutionaries: "The clever Russian is almost always
a Jew or has Jewish blood in him." (Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New
Biography, p. 112). Lenin was both clever and a revolutionary. He was surely
referring to himself.

Researcher Wayne McGuire of Harvard University writes: "Lenin was a Jew by
the standards of Israel's Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent.
It would seem that not only was Lenin a Jew, but that he was a Jewish racist
and chauvinist, although he kept his ideas on this volatile subject far in
the background, probably because they were in radical conflict with the
supposed universalism of Marxism. ...Lenin was a Jewish racist who
deliberately gave Jews especially, the most 'intellectually demanding
tasks.' He admitted that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the
south and west of Russia was comprised of Jews."

Lenin declared, "We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class." His
partner in crime, Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) stated: "The interests of the
revolution require the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class." Who
were these bourgeoisie? Certainly not Jews. Trotsky gave a clue to their
identity in a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper, Daily
Forward: "The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more
barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere."

Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed
after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime
punishable by death. (Izvestia, July 27, 1918).

The top Communist Judaic official Zinoviev stated: "Without mercy, without
sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be
thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of
Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Vólodarsky, let there be floods of the blood
of the bourgeoisie--more blood! As much as possible!" (Krasnaya Gazeta,
Sept. 1, 1918).

The Judaic Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest control.
Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant "bourgeoisie" was their prime
motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian peasantry of Russia
as so many vermin, beginning with Lenin's attack on them in the summer of
1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been almost completely ignored
in Western history.

According to the London, England "Jewish Chronicle" (Literary Supplement,
Sept. 3, 1999, pp. iv and v) Jewish Communist writer Isaac Babel was present
at a Soviet Communist gathering, "A meeting of...Jews...is being addressed
by Commissar Vinogradov who is enthusiastically telling the...Jews: 'You are
in power. Everything is yours." Babel also wrote of the "unbounded" Jewish
"contempt for the Polish gentry."

According to the "Jewish Chronicle," Babel wrote for the Communist
publication "Red Trooper" and a Soviet commissar related to him how they
intended to deal with Cossacks: "The revolutionary curve has thrown into the
first rank the free Cossacks soaked in many prejudices, but the Central
Committee's maneuvering will rub them down with a brush of iron.' Babel
expresses no opinion on the chances of successfully rubbing out the
Cossacks' 'soaked-in prejudices,' a euphemistic term for vicious
anti-Semitism..." ("Jewish Chronicle," Ibid.)

"In the last years of the '20s and the early '30s, Babel was regarded as one
of the most notable talents in Soviet literature. Speaking at the first
writers' congress in 1934...he made the expected avowals of loyalty and
devotion to the revolution, the government and the state. He even praised
Stalin's literary style." ("Jewish Chronicle," Ibid.)

In his story, "The Rabbi's Son," Babel places the portraits of Lenin and
Rabbi Moses Maimonides side by side. He notes that the margins of Communist
leaflets are crowded with "Hebrew verse."

The Siberian novelist Valentin Rasputin wrote in 1990: "I think today the
Jews here in Russia should feel responsible for the sin of having carried
out the revolution and for the shape it took. They should feel responsible
for the terror--for the terror that existed during the revolution and
especially after the revolution...their guilt is great. They perpetrated the
relentless campaign against the peasant class whose land was brutally
expropriated by the state and who themselves were ruthlessly murdered."

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's biographer recounts what it was like to grow up as
a Russian Christian child among the children of the Jewish communist elite:
"By the age of ten he had the cross ripped from his neck by jeering Pioneers
and for over a year was held up to ridicule... Solzhenitsyn was, as a boy,
exposed to students whose parents had an officially superior status. Most of
the members of the Young Pioneers and Komsomol movements, at least in
Rostov, were Jewish children..." (Michael Scammell, Solzhenitsyn: A
Biography, p. 64).

According to the internationally-syndicated RNS wire service (reprinted in
"The Christian News," Jan. 8, 1996, p. 2), "Some 200,000 (Christian) clergy,
many crucified, scalped and otherwise tortured, were killed during the
approximately 60 years of communist rule in the former Soviet Union, a
Russian commission reported Monday (Nov. 27, 1995)...40,000 churches (were)
destroyed in the period from 1922 to 1980..."

Here is the most genocidal political movement in world history, which
created the largest concentration camps and the most horrendous slave labor
system of the 20th century, in which millions of gentiles and Christians
were slaughtered (on the size of the Gulag concentration camp system cf. C.
Andrew and O. Gordievsky, KGB: The Inside Story and N.Y. Times, Oct. 22,
1990, p. 82. None of these camps are being preserved for posterity. Most
were destroyed long ago by special military brigades; cf. Michael Specter,
"Cold Reminder," N.Y. Times, Dec. 3, 1994).

This was a movement staffed in its upper echelons by Judaic Communists and
yet the world is comparatively silent about the holocaust and war crimes
this thoroughly kosher system inflicted and the identity of the persons who
were its architects.

Auschwitz is on the tip of every tongue but who has heard of Kolyma,
Magadan, the Solovetsky islands and the other infernal Soviet centers of
human destruction in eastern Siberia? Who has seen films and books about the
millions of human beings worked, frozen and starved to death in the
construction of the White Sea-Baltic Canal, over which stood a triumphant,
colossal statue of the Judaic Communist mass murderer Genrikh Yagoda?

The Judaic Communist epoch of mass murder has disappeared into history in
one of the great vanishing acts of all time. Only practiced deceivers, with
all the sleight of hand of the most accomplished stage magicians, could pull
off such a coup against the rest of humanity. To trick mankind into focusing
nearly all expiatory sentiment, monuments and commemoration on Judaic
victims and brand the Mark of Cain--the very words war crime and holocaust
itself--on Germany and upon Germans alone as their proprietary trademark,
must be regarded as one of the most masterful achievements of psychological
warfare in the annals of illusion.

Israeli power has expanded commensurate with the expansion of "Holocaust"
propaganda, as noted by the Israeli author Moshe Leshem: "Israelis and
American Jews fully agree that the memory of the Holocaust is an
indispensable weapon--one that must be used relentlessly against their
common enemy...Jewish organizations and individuals thus labor continuously
to remind the world of it. In America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust
memory is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which is
government-funded." ( Balaam's Curse, p. 228)

This is why Edgar Bronfman, the billionaire Canadian Seagram's whiskey
merchant and chairman of the powerful World Jewish Congress says, "The
growing numbers of revisionist supporters cannot be ignored. We must use
every resource to stop revisionism now, before it's too late."

The reason it must be stopped is because revisionism could prevent the holy
people from finishing the job they started in Russia and Bavaria, only this
time they are using intellectual means to achieve the same end.

Consider the fact that the people who bear the brunt of contemporary Jewish
racist hatred and invective, the Germans, have among the lowest birthrates
and the highest abortion rates of any nation in the world. Far more Germans
die every year than are born.

The self-hating Germans are not the only targets of corrosive gas chamber
guilt, however. Organized Christianity (more accurately called Churchianity)
nowadays is little more than one huge turkey flock, truckling, toadying and
crawling in search of Judaic sanctification and approbation. Their savior
called the Jewish leadership of his time, "the children of hell" (Matthew
23:15) but those who presume to speak in His name today, call them the
saints and sages of the cosmos.

Only in such a profoundly falsified world soaked in fraud could the
international media sit by, uninterested, as the great-great grandson of the
blood-drenched Jewish Red Army commander Leon Trotsky, David Axelrod, shot
to death an elderly Palestinian couple in November of 1990, as part of an
Israeli, "Kach" terror group raid.

But imagine--if you can--the hubbub if a grandson of a Nazi war criminal had
shot a Turkish couple in Germany. The weeping, wailing and never-ending
references to "Never Forget" and "lessons of history" would seep out of the
collective TV sets of the earth like waste from a toxic septic tank, because
what is clear from such a double standard is that the true lessons of
history are not being learned and recollection itself is hostage to the
diorama of Zionist monomania.

Sixteen million ethnic Germans were forcibly expelled from Silesia, Moravia
and the Volga regions of the eastern territories at the end of the Second
World War. On this trail of tears, two million perished--shot to death,
starved, raped and beaten. Ask one in one thousand, one in ten thousand
people on the street today-- "Have you heard?" The answer will be no.

The Steven Spielberg movie images of cattle cars jammed with human cargo are
reserved for Jewish victims alone. The 800,000 mostly Muslim Chechens
deported by Judaic commissars and savagely stuffed into railway cars to
Kazakhstan, where a quarter of a million died enroute, do not meet
Hollywood's standard of cinematic focus.

The Soviet cattle car deportations afflicted more than a half-million
Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Christians who were shipped to the Gulag.
12% of the entire Baltic population was either deported to Siberia or
executed by the Jewish Soviet Secret Police. Who knows of it? Who cares? Who
tries to keep this history from repeating? Instead, in 1995 the president of
Lithuania made a pilgrimage to the Israeli gas chamber shrine at Yad Vashem
to grovel and beg "forgiveness" for his people who were the victims of the
Jewish Communist murderers. To seek forgiveness in all humility is ordained
when it is predicated on the truth. To do so based on false witness in order
to idolize the Pharisees is a mockery of justice.

In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet communist
party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of the total
population (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

The following is a list of some top Judaic Communist murderers, commissars,
spies, assassins and propagandists (aliases are listed in parentheses). This
list is by no means comprehensive. To catalog all of the Judaic Communist
involved in crimes would require hundreds of pages.

Judaic Communists
V.I. Lenin, supreme dictator. Leon Bronstein (Trotsky): supreme commander of
the Soviet Red Army. Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev): executive, Soviet Secret
Police. Solomon Lozovsky: deputy Soviet foreign minister. Maxim Wallach
(Litvinov): Soviet foreign minister. Yuri Andropov: director, Soviet KGB,
later supreme dictator of the Soviet Union.

Jacob Sverdlov: first president of the Soviet Union. Sverdlov ordered the
massacre of the Czar's family--women and children--in the town named after
Catherine the Great, Yekaterinburg, (renamed Sverdlovsk in 1924 in honor of
the murderer).

Jacob Yurovsky: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Yurovsky led the death
squad which carried out Sverdlov's order for the murder of the Czar's
family, including the bayoneting to death of the Czar's daughters. The
Ipatyev house, where, in the basement, the massacre had occurred, stood
intact until 1977, when the local Communist party boss at that time, Boris
Yeltsin, ordered it demolished, lest it become a shrine to anti-Jewish
sentiment.

Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (pictured at left): chief mass murderer for
Stalin, ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of
Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral of Christ
the Savior. Standing amid the rubble of the cathedral, Kaganovich
proclaimed, "Mother Russia is cast down. We have ripped away her skirts."
(N.Y. Times, Sept. 26, 1995).

Mikhail Kaganovich: deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of slave
labor, brother of Lazar. Rosa Kaganovich: Stalin's mistress; sister of
Lazar. Paulina Zhemchuzina: member of the Central Committee and wife of
Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov. Olga Bronstein: officer, Soviet Cheka
Secret Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.

Genrikh Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer extraordinaire.
(Jewish poet Romain Rolland, winner of the Nobel Prize, wrote a hymn of
praise to Yagoda).

Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag death camp system.

Lev Inzhir, commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration.
Boris Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother of
Matvei. K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police.

Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk: commissars of death camps and slave labor,
supervised the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of the White
Sea--Baltic Canal.

M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Slutsky and Shpiegelglas:
commanders, Soviet Secret Police. Isaac Babel: officer, Soviet Secret
Police.

Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army;
officer, Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the
Spanish Civil War. He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and
peasants in Spain.

Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee.
Dimitri Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army. Yakov ("Yankel") Kreiser: general,
Soviet Red Army. Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.

David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union. Grigori
Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army. Mikhail Chazkelevich: general, Soviet Red
Army. Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army. Arseni Raskin:
deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army. Haim Fomin, commander of Brest-Litovsk,
Soviet Red Army. At least one hundred Soviet generals were Jewish (cf.
Canadian Jewish News, April 19, 1989).

Generals who were not themselves Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among these
were Marshal Voroshilov, Marshal Bulganin, Marshal Peresypkin and General
Pavel Sudoplatov (Sudoplatov assassinated hundreds of Christian leaders
including Ukranian Catholic Archbishop Teodor Romzha). This Jewish wife
"insurance policy" extended to Politburo members such as Andrei Andreyev and
Leonoid Brezhnev.

Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted
Christian peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The kulaks
were subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein's Bezhin Meadow).

KOMZET: commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on land seized
from murdered Christians in Ukraine; funded by Jewish-American financier
Julius Rosenwald.

Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of
anti-German hate material dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg instigated the
Soviet Red Army rape and murder of German civilians. Referring to German
women, Ehrenburg gloated to the advancing Red Army troops, "that blonde hag
is in for a bad time."

In a leaflet addressed to Soviet troops, Ehrenburg wrote: "...the Germans
are not human beings...nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses."
(Anatol Goldberg, Ilya Ehrenburg, p. 197). Goldberg concedes that Ehrenburg,
"...had always disliked the Germans...now that there was a war on he turned
his old prejudice into an asset." (Ibid., p. 193).

Another publication distributed to the Red Army, this time as the soldiers
approached Danzig, was described by a historian: "Millions of leaflets were
air-dropped on the troops with a message composed by the propagandist Ilya
Ehrenburg and signed by Stalin: 'Soldiers of the Red Army! Kill the Germans!
Kill all Germans! Kill! Kill! Kill!" (Christopher Duffy, Red Storm on the
Reich).

The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the extermination
of the entire German people (cf. Pravda, April 14, 1945. [Pravda was also
published in a Yiddish edition, Einikeyt). Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin
and the Stalin Prize. He willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem
'Holocaust' Museum.

Solomon Mikhoels: commissar of Soviet propaganda. Soviet film propagandists:
Mark Donsky, Leonid Lukov, Yuli Reisman, Vasily Grossman,Yevgeny
Gabrilovich, Boris Volchok and Lillian Hellman (old movies written by her
continue to be broadcast on American telelvision).

Soviet propagandist: Yevgeny Khaldei who staged the photo of the raising of
the hammer and sickle flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, May 2, 1945.
Afterward, a special plane was waiting to fly Khaldei, Stalin's top Tass
photographer, to a Moscow lab, where his photo was further doctored (loot
displayed on one of the Soviet soldier's wrists was removed in the negative
and Khaldei added clouds and smoke to the scene for dramatic effect (see
photo of Khaldei and his beloved flag at left). Khaldei continued to work as
a premier Soviet propagandist until his retirement from Pravda in 1972. His

Communist propaganda is proudly on display at the Jewish Museum of New York
and the Jewish Museum of San Francisco. N.Y. Times writer Vicki Goldberg
exulted in the raising of the blood-drenched Soviet flag, emblem of the
slaughter of millions of peasants and Christians; describing it as, "...a
national (and worldwide) symbol of triumph, justice and revenge." (Jan. 31,
1997, p. B-26).

Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC): new form of the Bolshevik YEVKOM,
Stalin's recruiting conduit for funding money, supplies and political
influence for Soviet Russia from world Jewry as well as the dissemination of
gas chamber atrocity propaganda (cf. The Black Book).

Nikolai Bukharin: Lenin's chief theorist. Samuel Agursky: commissar. Karl
Radek: member, Central Committee. Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin) commissar.
A.A. Yoffe: commissar. David Ryazanov: advisor to Lenin. Lev Grigorievich
Levin: physician, poisoner of Stalin's enemies. Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev):
member of the Central Committee.

Ivan Maisky: Soviet Ambassador to Britain. Itzik Solomonovich Feffer:
commissar, Soviet Secret Police. Abraham Sutskever: Soviet
terrorist-partisan. Mark Osipovich Reizen: Soviet propagandist, winner of
three Stalin Prizes. Lev Leopold Trepper: Soviet espionage officer.

Bela Kun (Kohen): supreme dictator of Hungary in 1919. Kun was later
Stalin's chief terrorist in the Crimea. Kun's eventual successor was Matyas
Rakosi, Jewish Communist mass murderer of Christians in Hungary. According
to the Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 14, 1997, Jews "...played key roles in
ushering Communist rule into Hungary. In fact, during the brutal oppression
of the early 1950s, the regime's top five leaders were Jews. "

Zakharovich Mekhlis: top executioner for Stalin. Henrykas Zimanas: leader of
Lithuanian communist terrorists, butcher of Christians.

Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade): commander, Yugoslav Communist
People's Army. Tito's top butcher of hundreds of thousands of Croatian
Christians. Pijade later served as president of the Yugoslav Communist
Parliament. At least eighteen generals in the Yugoslav Communist People's
Army were Jewish. The Yugoslavian communist party sent massive arms
shipments to Jewish fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.

In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Jewish
communists: the torturer Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police; the
Politboro commander Jacob Berman (pictured at right)

and commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski. These men murdered
or deported to Kolyma and the other Arctic death camps, tens of thousands of
Catholic Poles.

According to Jewish researcher John Sack, "In 1945 many Poles felt (and not
without reason) that Jews ran the Office of State Security...the chief of
the Office was Jacob Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department
heads were Jews." Sack reports that 75% of the officers of the Communist
Secret Police in Silesia were Jews. He noted that many Jews in the Communist
terror apparatus in Poland changed their names to Polish ones like General
Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski, Capt. Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. John
Sack, The New Republic, Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6. Sack in this article also
refutes some shoddy research performed by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of
Hitler's Willing Executioners, who, in the double standard typical of the
Jewish mentality, refuses to accept the proven fact that Jews ran the Polish
Communist secret police even as Goldhagen asserts the racist myth that the
entire German nation was guilty of genocide. Sack does a good job of proving
Goldhagen wrong about Poland).

In Poland, "...a disproportionate number of Communists were Jews. In 1930,
at its peak, 35% of the members of the party were Jewish. In Communist youth
organizations, Jewish membership was even higher, while Communists of Jewish
origin occupied most of the seats on the central committee. Communism
appealed to some Jews because it opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than
any other Polish party...Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years
immediately after World War Two, when the party leadership was totally in
the hands of the prewar Communist leadership that abhorred anti-Semitism."
(Sheldon Kirshner, The Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 5, 1992, p. 16).

Of course when one encounters the issue of Judaics, Communists and Catholics
in Poland in the Establishment media or universities today, the mass murder
of the Polish Catholics at the hands of the Jewish Communists, is never
raised. Instead, a minor attack on Jews by Polish peasants enraged at the
role of Jews in Communist terror, which occurred in July, 1946 at Kielce and
which has come to be called the "Kielce pogrom" will be the centerpiece of
the "discussion. " The motivation for the attack is not usually mentioned.
Rather, the Catholic peasantry are painted in terms of "fiendish bigots"
whose "blind, irrational hate" for the "poor, persecuted Jews" resulted in
"yet another martyrdom of God's Chosen."

But the Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal Hlond, a brave
prelate in a stalwart tradition of Christian resistance to Jewish tyranny in
Poland, so different from the traitorous philo-Judaism of the current
Pontiff, stated that the attack in Kielce occurred because of resentment
'due to the Jews who today occupy leading positions in Poland's (Communist)
government and endeavor to introduce a governmental structure that the
majority of Poles do not wish to have." (Ibid., Kirshner).

As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observes, "The average Pole could not
but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the
country--Berman and Minc--were both Jewish as was the dreaded security
official Rozanski." (N.Y. Review of Books, Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).

With this record it is interesting to note that the Polish occupant of the
papacy, John Paul II, consistently lent his prestige and his presence to
canonizations and commemorations of politically correct victims of the
Nazis. Nowhere did this Pope breath a word about the openly Jewish,
Communist massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics, Croatian
Catholics, Lithuanian Catholics--he was too busy, intoning the Shoah,
referring to the heirs of the Pharisees as "our Elder Brothers in the Faith"
giving official recognition to an Israeli state which even many orthodox,
Haredi rabbis regard as a blasphemous and abominable entity, and attacking
the German people as "the image of the beast."


Solomon Morel (pictured at left): commandant of a post-war Communist
concentration camp for Germans in Poland. Stalin deliberately put Jews in
charge of such camps. Morel tortured and murdered thousands of Germans,
sometimes with his bare hands (cf. "The Wrath of Solomon," Village Voice,
March 30, 1993 and John Sack, An Eye for an Eye). Morel is comfortably
esconsed in Tel Aviv. German survivors of Morel's camp have demanded he be
tried as a war criminal, but for the Establishment media and the phony,
partisan, "human rights" groups, bringing Morel to justice is simply a
non-issue. After all, he murdered helpless Germans, so what's the problem?

Julius Hammer, M.D.: New York abortionist and co-founder of the American
communist party. Armand Hammer: fundraiser and financier for Lenin and
Stalin, son of Julius. "The Communist Party was also the most Jewish party
in America. At least nineteen percent of the Young Communist League were
Jews and never less than forty percent of its leadership." (Source: "Pakn
Treger: From Yiddish Roots to the Frontiers of Jewish Culture," Fall 1997,
p. 18).

Lev Davidovich Landau: Stalinist physicist, co-father of the Soviet atomic
bomb. Klaus Fuchs: helped steal atomic bomb secrets for Stalin. Ruth Werner:
colonel, Red Army GRU intelligence, assisted Fuchs. Julius and Ethel
Rosenberg: stole American atomic bomb secrets for Stalin. Morris Cohen
(Peter Kroger): assisted the Rosenbergs. Markus Wolf: chief of German
Communist Stasi Secret Police.

Howard Fast: American communist propagandist for Stalin. David Dubinsky:
Stalin's ally, head of the U.S. International Ladies Garment Workers Union.
Nahum Goldmann: founder, World Jewish Congress, communist propagandist.
Rabbi Moses Rosen: agent, Romanian communist party. Victor Rothschild: top
British espionage agent for Stalin.

Mark Zborowski: "...considered by historians of Soviet terror operations to
have been the most fearsome...(Soviet) spy of all time" (Stephen Schwartz,
Forward, Jan. 26, 1996). Zborowski, a medical researcher, murdered a
dissident with a poisoned orange at the Soviet-run hospital in Paris.
Zborowski was implicated in several other assassinations in 1936 and 1937.
In the 1940s worked for both the American Jewish Committee and the KGB. In
the 1960s Zborowski worked as a medical researcher at Mount Zion Hospital in
San Francisco. He trained numerous psychiatrists and medical specialists in
the Bay Area. He died in 1990 (cf. "The Strange Case of Doctor Zborowski and
Monsieur Etienne" by Philippe Videlier, in Le Monde Diplomatique, Dec.
1992).

From 1936-1939, when Stalin's "International Brigade" forces were dispatched
to Spain to fight the Catholics, Jewish Communists comprised the largest
faction of his troops, "More than 40,000 volunteers fought in the
International Brigade...A huge number of the volunteers were Jews: between
7,000 and 10,000 of the Internationals as a whole, more than one-third of
the Americans." Jewish Communist Milton Wolff was the last commander of the
American contingent. Rabbi Hyman Katz joined in order to fight Spanish
Christians. (cf. Jeffrey Sharlet, "Troublemakers," Pakn Treger, Fall, 1997,
pp. 16, 18 and 24).

The Communists slaughtered 6,549 Spanish priests, 283 helpless nuns and 13
bishops. "In Ciudad Real in the center of Spain, the bishop and every single
priest of the diocese were murdered; not one escaped." --Dr. Warren H.
Carroll, 70 Years of the Communist Revolution, pp. 184-185, 188-189. (Also
cf. Justo Perez de Urbel, Catholic Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War [Kansas
City, Missouri: The Angelus Press, 1993).

Stalin's propaganda agent in Spain was New Yorker Leon Rosenthal.

On Oct. 16, 1948, 50,000 Jewish communists turned out in Moscow's Red Square
to welcome the first Israeli delegation to Moscow. Stalin supported
Zionism's 1947 Palestine partition plan, gave crucial recognition to the
newly-created state of Israel and voted for Israel's admission to the United
Nations.

In 1951 communist and Marxist parties had twenty-three seats in the Israeli
Knesset. The kibbutz system was the most powerful movement in the country
and the most powerful kibbutz leaders were nearly all Marxists. The biggest
Israeli holiday was May Day, celebrated with rallies, marches, red banners
and red songs.

As recently as 1987 the Israelis were providing the KGB with American
intelligence secrets (cf. UPI dispatch by Richard Sale, Dec. 13, 1987 and
The City Paper [Washington, DC], Jan. 15, 1988). Jonathan Jay Pollard was
part of one such spy ring. British traitor and Communist spy Kim Philby was
assisted in obtaining safe haven in the Soviet Union by the Israeli Mossad
(cf. Sunday Telegraph [England], April 16, 1989). This was most appropriate
since Philby's KGB handler in Moscow was also Jewish.

Romania's communist regime received favorable trade deals from the U.S. for
years due to Israeli pressure on Congress in its behalf (N.Y. Times, Jan.
18, 1992, p. 23). The notion that the Zionist Jewish movement was
anti-communist is a fallacy. The truth is more complex. There was a left
wing and a right wing within Zionism. The rightists, like the terrorists
Jabotinsky and Stern, took a fascist approach. Leftist Zionists like David
"I am a Bolshevik" Ben-Gurion admired the Soviet model of Jewish power and
sought to incorporate it as the political economy of the Israeli state.

"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs
characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme
form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death
penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two
Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, "one of its foremost intellectuals"( London
Sunday Times, Aug. 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo).

Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and
studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we
Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary
General of the South African Communist Party in 1986. ("Joe Slovo," Jewish
Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).

Slovo had been the " planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including
the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured many others... Slovo,
who had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was awarded a Soviet medal
on his 60th birthday...Slovo is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist
without morality of any kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the
human cost, whatever the bloodshed...Slovo disputes little of his image as
'the Communist mastermind' behind the ANC's armed struggle. For him the
fears of South Africa's whites are both a measure of the ANC's growing
strength and a crucial factor in hastening what he believes will be its
ultimate victory. 'Revolutionary violence has created the inspirational
impact that we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading
position,' Slovo said." ("Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid," L.A.
Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela's ANC took over South
Africa, Slovo was named Minister of Housing.














Nelson Mandela and Joe Slovo give the clenched fist salute in front of the
blood-drenched Hammer and Sickle flag of Bolshevism. Slovo, a
Yiddish-speaking Lithuanian 'Jew,' was Secretary General of the South
African Communist Party and director of the military wing of the ANC, which
perpetrated numerous terror bombings against white civilians.

When we look at these gruesome personalities, who are only the tip of the
Jewish iceberg that was Soviet Communism and who were responsible for the
deaths of upwards of thirty million people; when we realize how little is
written or filmed about their crimes, we begin to realize that the exclusive
focus on the crimes of the Germans, real and imagined, is a function of
propaganda.

If the facts about the Jewish Communist holocaust against the peasants and
Christians of Russia and Eastern Europe were given massive publicity, the
supposed "special evil" of the Germans would stand exposed as a racist
fraud.

German actions during World War Two must be viewed in a vacuum in order for
the New World Order to advance its covert objective of Jewish supremacy.

When Nazi actions are placed within the context of Jewish Communism's
abominable crimes against the Christian people of Russia and Eastern Europe,
the public will begin to understand that Hitler and the Nazis were a
reaction, however unbalanced and excessive, to the Jewish Communist genocide
against millions of Christians and peasants in the East.

This is why the crucial facts about Jewish Communism must never be
documented in Hollywood films, discussed in university courses or pictured
in contemporary news magazines. This is why Malcolm Muggeridge's book, an
eyewitness account of the Jewish Communist holocaust against Christians,
Winter in Moscow, has been tightly suppressed.

In the Sunday Telegraph (London, England: Nov. 18, 1990) the question is
asked, "Why then has it (Winter in Moscow) never been republished? The
answer may lie in Muggeridge's handling of what was then called the 'Jewish
question.'...Winter in Moscow is acutely concerned with Jews...It was of
course the case that a very disproportionate number of the early Bolsheviks
were Jews and thus of commissars and apparatchiki..."

Our documentation of these forbiden facts constitutes the chief motivation
for the suppression attempts of such Stalinist censorship groups as the
A.D.L. and Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both of these organizations would, if
they could, have this writer jailed for publishing the documentation herein
in Germany, France, or Austria. They regularly supply "intelligence files"
to those governments on pro-Christian and pro-German writers. In 1995 the
ADL sought to assist the prosecution of 69 year old American writer Hans
Schmidt who was imprisoned in Germany for publishing a newsletter in
Florida. These Judaic censors would like to have similar laws passed
worldwide, resulting in the jailing of more writers and researchers who will
not toe the party line or worship the Golden Calf.

To give the other side of history, the revisionist side--to give voice to
the voiceless millions of dead victims of Judaic Communism--is regarded as
"hateful" by the vain Zionists who demand for themselves the right to vomit
forth a daily barrage of sewage upon the sacred memory of our grandparents
and ancestors. To defend against the dishonoring of our heritage and our
ancestors, is surely not hate; it is the right of self-defense against
psychological warfare.

Copyright©2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II. All Rights Reserved

The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet Regime
Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism
by Mark Weber
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html

In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police
murdered Russia's last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife,
Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four
daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of
the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they
were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To
prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the
countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.

Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been
shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths
of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed
for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out
the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do
with the crime.

In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the
result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the
reminiscences of Lenin's bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he
personally delivered Lenin's execution order to the telegraph office. The
telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov
had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.

Radzinsky's research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated.
Leon Trotsky -- one of Lenin's closest colleagues -- had revealed years
earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the
Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky
wrote:

My next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of
Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov, I asked in
passing: "Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?"

"Finished," he replied. "He has been shot."

"And where is the family?"

"The family along with him."

"All of them?," I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.

"All of them," replied Sverdlov. "What about it?" He was waiting to see my
reaction. I made no reply.

"And who made the decision?," I asked.

"We decided it here. Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the
Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult
circumstances."

I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.

Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky and others also corroborates
the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the
London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the
Romanovs - originally published in 1920, and recently reissued by the
Institute for Historical Review -- is based in large part on the findings of
a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the
authority of "White" (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton's
book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of
Russia's imperial family.

A solid understanding of history has long been the best guide to
comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people
are most interested in historical questions during times of crisis, when the
future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in the
Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on
the ruins of the old, historical issues have become very topical. For
example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the
teachings of German-Jewish social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking
control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?

In recent years, Jews around the world have been voicing anxious concern
over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union.
In this new and uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred
and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According to one
public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted
all Jews to leave the country. But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so
widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many
Russians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame "the Jews" for so much
misfortune?

A Taboo Subject
Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the
country's total population, they played a highly disproportionate and
probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively
dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians,
along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades preferred to
ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.

With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading
Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky
(Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet
foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party's
executive secretary and -- as chairman of the Central Executive Committee --
head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the
Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading
revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press
commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov
(Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.

Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also
one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was
a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.

A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties
with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. "An intelligent
Russian," he once remarked, "is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish
blood in his veins."

Critical Meetings
In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably
critical.

Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik "October Revolution" of 1917, Lenin
convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key
leaders of the Bolshevik party's Central Committee made the fateful decision
to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in
this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one
Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.

To direct the takeover, a seven-man "Political Bureau" was chosen. It
consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and
four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev). Meanwhile, the
Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet -- whose chairman was Trotsky -- established
an 18-member "Military Revolutionary Committee" to actually carry out the
seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one
Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews. Finally, to supervise the organization of
the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man
"Revolutionary Military Center" as the Party's operations command. It
consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole
(Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).

Contemporary Voices of Warning
Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at the
time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston Churchill, for one,
warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London
Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a "worldwide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis
of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality."
The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism
and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these
international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very
great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of
Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus
Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate,
Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot
be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the
Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet
institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the
prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism
applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution
[the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in
the breasts of the Russian people.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January
1918 dispatch to Washington: "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are
Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or
any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a
worldwide social revolution."

The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, made much the same point a
few months later: "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is
bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it
is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."

"The Bolshevik Revolution," declared a leading American Jewish community
paper in 1920, "was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish
discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct."

As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling
Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made
anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the
first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish
sentiment. Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as
indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia,
American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that "because so many
of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia],
particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are
being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel."

Historians' Views
Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport
writes:

Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over
their high representation in the new government. Lenin's first Politburo was
dominated by men of Jewish origins

Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution,
including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to eradicate
anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution -- partly because of
the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in
the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo
Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the
new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of
the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.

The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was headed by
the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose
vanity knew no bounds.

"Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka," wrote
Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, "stood a very good chance of finding
himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator." In
Ukraine, "Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,"
reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history.
(Beginning as the Cheka, or Vecheka) the Soviet secret police was later
known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)

In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy,
the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar
and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the Soviet chief who co-signed
Lenin's execution order.

Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply
criticized the Jewish role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and
establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading
dissident during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights
activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on the Defense of Human
Rights in the USSR.

In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist
rule, he noted that Jews were "amazingly" numerous among the personnel of
the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik
executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of
Nicholas II:

This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so
that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or
Louis XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant
ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action,
which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The
execution was personally overseen by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the
president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person
responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya
Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the
execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German)
about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.

In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a
similarly harsh assessment:

The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the
stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the
Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out
by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the
act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.

In the struggle for power that followed Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin
emerged victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to
death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks leaders -
including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time,
and particularly after 1928, the Jewish role in the top leadership of the
Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.

Put To Death Without Trial
For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing
"Nicholas Romanov" before a "Revolutionary Tribunal" that would publicize
his "crimes against the people" before sentencing him to death. Historical
precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a
consequence of revolutionary upheaval: England's Charles I was beheaded in
1649, and France's Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.

In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial,
during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas
II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was secretly put to death -
along with his family and staff -- in the dead of night, in an act that
resembled more a gangster-style massacre than a formal execution.

Why did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former
Tsar? In Wilton's view, Nicholas and his family were murdered because the
Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support,
and rightly feared that the Russian people would never approve killing the
Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.

For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre as a useful and even necesssary
measure. He wrote:

The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but
necessary. The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would
continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the
Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill
a sense of hopelessness in the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to
show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory or
total doom This Lenin sensed well.

Historical Context
In the years leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately
represented in all of Russia's subversive leftist parties. Jewish hatred of
the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading
European powers of the day, imperial Russia was the most institutionally
conser-vative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted
to reside outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the "Pale
of Settlement."

However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward
the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly
more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify. In a recently published
book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish
writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting
the Bolshevik regime the "historic sin of the Jews." She points, for
example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag
concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the
systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, "The Jews
of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face
of any criticism from the opposition." In light of this record, Margolina
offers a grim prediction:

The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the
subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet
power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the
Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.

If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek
the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame "the Jews" for the
horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable than to blame "white people"
for Negro slavery, or "the Germans" for the Second World War or "the
Holocaust."

Words of Grim Portent
Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a
regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the
Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:

Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of
hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own
blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of
the bourgeoisie -- more blood, as much as possible.

Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918,
effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: "We
must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet
Russia's inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They
must be annihilated."

'The Twenty Million'
As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to be
much higher than Zinoviev's murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever,
has a regime taken the lives of so many of its own people.

Citing newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov,
head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently concluded that
"from 1929 to 1952 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a
third were shot, the rest sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died."

Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and
head of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier
Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: "From January 1, 1935 to June 22, 1941,
19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were
shot in prison, and a majority of the others died in camp." These figures
were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.

Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist of Soviet history, recently
summed up the grim record of Soviet "repression" of it own people:

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well
over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933
famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting
to another ten million plus. The total is thus in the range of what the
Russians now refer to as 'The Twenty Million'."

A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.

The Tsarist Era in Retrospect
With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new
and more respectful look at their country's pre-Communist history, including
the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the Soviets -- along with many in
the West -- have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an
age of arbitrary despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality
is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar was
absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice,
and that the mass of the empire's citizens were peasants, it is worth noting
that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press,
religion, assembly and association, protection of private property, and free
labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were treated with
remarkable leniency.

During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian
economy was booming. In fact, between 1890 and 1913, it was the fastest
growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double
that of the Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased
by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled. Exported Russian
grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia
witnessed a magnificent flowering of cultural life.

Everything changed with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for
Russia, but for the entire West.

Monarchist Sentiment
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during
the entire Soviet era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs
and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas II
has been sweeping Russia in recent years.

People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours' wages to
purchase portraits of Nicholas from street vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg
and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes
and apartments. In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a
30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street vendor:
"I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It's like a
nuclear explosion. People really want to know about their Tsar and his
family." Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up
in many cities.

A public opinion poll conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet
citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as a
despicable crime. Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a
martyr. The independent "Orthodox Church Abroad" canonized the imperial
family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under
popular pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing
reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox Archbishop of
Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of
the killings. "The people loved Emperor Nicholas," he said. "His memory
lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without court
verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy."

On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled
the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a
large white cross festooned with flowers now marks the spot where the family
was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the
victims.

Reflecting both popular sentiment and new social-political realities, the
white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was
officially adopted in 1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993,
the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation's official emblem,
replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to
honor Communist figures -- such as Leningrad, Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin,
and Gorky -- have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which
had been named Sverdlovsk by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the
Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name,
which honors Empress Catherine I.

Symbolic Meaning
In view of the millions that would be put to death by the Soviet rulers in
the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of
extraordinary importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In
the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:

The manner in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first
denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something
that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it
as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.

Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov
family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire
West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.

The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because,
whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a
personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.

The Massacre's Place in History
The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary
upheavals that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the
ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental social
order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its
stable constitutional monarchy, and the ancient Habsburg dynasty of
Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe's
leading states shared not only the same Christian and Western cultural
foundations, but most of the continent's reigning monarchs were related by
blood. England's King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar
Nicholas, and, through his father, a first cousin of Empress Alexandra.
Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra,
and a distant cousin of Nicholas.

More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia's Tsar
personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of the last
emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only
symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many
Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the
Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.

Notes
Edvard Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 327,
344-346.; Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21,
1990.
From an April 1935 entry in "Trotsky's Diary in Exile." Quoted in: Richard
Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), pp. 770, 787.; Robert
K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.; E.
Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 325-326.; Ronald
W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 349-350.
On Wilton and his career in Russia, see: Phillip Knightley, The First
Casualty (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976), pp. 141-142, 144-146, 151-152,
159, 162, 169, and, Anthony Summers and Tom Mangold, The File on the Tsar
(New York: Harper and Row, 1976), pp. 102-104, 176.
AP dispatch from Moscow, Toronto Star, Sept. 26, 1991, p. A2.; Similarly, a
1992 survey found that one-fourth of people in the republics of Belarus
(White Russia) and Uzbekistan favored deporting all Jews to a special Jewish
region in Russian Siberia. "Survey Finds Anti-Semitism on Rise in Ex-Soviet
Lands," Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1992, p. A4.
At the turn of the century, Jews made up 4.2 percent of the population of
the Russian Empire. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990),
p. 55 (fn.). By comparison, in the United States today, Jews make up less
than three percent of the total population (according to the most
authoritative estimates).
See individual entries in: H. Shukman, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of
the Russian Revolution (Oxford: 1988), and in: G. Wigoder, ed., Dictionary
of Jewish Biography (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991). The prominent
Jewish role in Russia's pre-1914 revolutionary underground, and in the early
Soviet regime, is likewise confirmed in: Stanley Rothman and S. Robert
Lichter, Roots of Radicalism (New York: Oxford, 1982), pp. 92-94. In 1918,
the Bolshevik Party's Central Committee had 15 members. German scholar
Herman Fehst -- citing published Soviet records -- reported in his useful
1934 study that of six of these 15 were Jews. Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus
und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus
(Berlin: 1934), pp. 68-72.; Robert Wilton, though, reported that in 1918 the
Central Committee of the Bolshevik party had twelve members, of whom nine
were of Jewish origin and three were of Russian ancestry. R. Wilton, The
Last Days of the Romanovs (IHR, 1993), p. 185.
After years of official suppression, this fact was acknowledged in 1991 in
the Moscow weekly Ogonyok. See: Jewish Chronicle (London), July 16, 1991.;
See also: Letter by L. Horwitz in The New York Times, Aug. 5, 1992, which
cites information from the Russian journal "Native Land Archives."; "Lenin's
Lineage?"'Jewish,' Claims Moscow News," Forward (New York City), Feb. 28,
1992, pp. 1, 3.; M. Checinski, Jerusalem Post (weekly international
edition), Jan. 26, 1991, p. 9.
Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), p. 352.
Harrison E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions,
1905-1917 (Doubleday, 1978), p. 475.; William H. Chamberlin, The Russian
Revolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 291-292.; Herman
Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft
des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 42-43.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir
Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 318-319. This
meeting was held on October 10 (old style, Julian calendar), and on October
23 (new style). The six Jews who took part were: Uritsky, Trotsky, Kamenev,
Zinoviev, Sverdlov and Soklonikov. The Bolsheviks seized power in Petersburg
on October 25 (old style) -- hence the reference to the "Great October
Revolution" -- which is November 7 (new style).
William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (1987), vol. 1, p. 292.; H. E.
Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978),
p. 475.
W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 1, pp. 274, 299, 302, 306.;
Alan Moorehead, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1965), pp. 235, 238, 242,
243, 245.; H. Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum (Berlin: 1934), pp. 44, 45.
H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia's Revolutions, 1905-1917
(1978), p. 479-480.; Dmitri Volkogonov, Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy (New
York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), pp. 27-28, 32.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir
Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 319-320.
"Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people,"
Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920. Facsimile reprint in:
William Grimstad, The Six Million Reconsidered (1979), p. 124. (At the time
this essay was published, Churchill was serving as minister of war and air.)
David R. Francis, Russia from the American Embassy (New York: 1921), p. 214.
Foreign Relations of the United States -- 1918 -- Russia, Vol. 1
(Washington, DC: 1931), pp. 678-679.
American Hebrew (New York), Sept. 1920. Quoted in: Nathan Glazer and Daniel
Patrick Moynihan, Beyond the Melting Pot (Cambridge, Mass.: 1963), p. 268.
C. Jacobson, "Jews in the USSR" in: American Review on the Soviet Union,
August 1945, p. 52.; Avtandil Rukhadze, Jews in the USSR: Figures, Facts,
Comment (Moscow: Novosti, 1978), pp. 10-11.
T. Emmons and B. M. Patenaude, eds., War, Revolution and Peace in Russia:
The Passages of Frank Golder, 1913-1927 (Stanford: Hoover Institution,
1992), pp. 320, 139, 317.
Louis Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: Free Press, 1990),
pp. 30, 31, 37. See also pp. 43, 44, 45, 49, 50.
Quoted in: Salo Baron, The Russian Jews Under Tsars and Soviets (New York:
1976), pp. 170, 392 (n. 4).
The Atlantic, Sept. 1991, p. 14.; In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff
in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. By order, the
Cheka took few Jewish hostages. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p.
824.; Israeli historian Louis Rapoport also confirms the dominant role
played by Jews in the Soviet secret police throughout the 1920s and 1930s.
L. Rapoport, Stalin's War Against the Jews (New York: 1990), pp. 30-31,
43-45, 49-50.
E. Radzinsky, The Last Tsar (1992), pp. 244, 303-304.; Bill Keller, "Cult of
the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.; See also: W. H.
Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 2, p. 90.
Quoted in: The New Republic, Feb. 5, 1990, pp. 30 ff.; Because of the
alleged anti-Semitism of Russophobia, in July 1992 Shafarevich was asked by
the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC) to resign as an associate
member of that prestigious body.
R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), p. 148.
Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.; Robert K. Massie,
Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.
An article in a 1907 issue of the respected American journal National
Geographic reported on the revolutionary situation brewing in Russia in the
years before the First World War: " The revolutionary leaders nearly all
belong to the Jewish race, and the most effective revolutionary agency is
the Jewish Bund " W. E. Curtis, "The Revolution in Russia," The National
Geographic Magazine, May 1907, pp. 313-314. Piotr Stolypin, probably
imperial Russia's greatest statesman, was murdered in 1911 by a Jewish
assassin. In 1907, Jews made up about ten percent of Bolshevik party
membership. In the Menshevik party, another faction of the Russian Social
Democratic Labor Party, the Jewish proportion was twice as high. R. Pipes,
The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 365.; See also: R. Wilton, The Last Days
of the Romanovs (1993), pp. 185-186.
Martin Gilbert, Atlas of Jewish History (1977), pp. 71, 74.; In spite of the
restrictive "Pale" policy, in 1897 about 315,000 Jews were living outside
the Pale, most of them illegally. In 1900 more than 20,000 were living in
the capital of St. Petersburg, and another 9,000 in Moscow.
Sonja Margolina, Das Ende der Lügen: Russland und die Juden im 20.
Jahrhundert (Berlin: 1992). Quoted in: "Ein ganz heisses Eisen angefasst,"
Deutsche National-Zeitung (Munich), July 21, 1992, p. 12.
Krasnaia Gazetta ("Red Gazette"), September 1, 1918. Quoted in: Richard
Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 820, 912 (n. 88).
Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 820.
Contrary to what a number of western historians have for years suggested,
Soviet terror and the Gulag camp system did not begin with Stalin. At the
end of 1920, Soviet Russia already had 84 concentration camps with
approximately 50,000 prisoners. By October 1923 the number had increased to
315 camps with 70,000 inmates. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p.
836.
Cited by historian Robert Conquest in a review/ article in The New York
Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
Review/article by Robert Conquest in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23,
1993, p. 27.; In the "Great Terror" years of 1937-1938 alone, Conquest has
calculated, approximately one million were shot by the Soviet secret police,
and another two million perished in Soviet camps. R. Conquest, The Great
Terror (New York: Oxford, 1990), pp. 485-486.; Conquest has estimated that
13.5 to 14 million people perished in the collectivization
("dekulakization") campaign and forced famine of 1929-1933. R. Conquest, The
Harvest of Sorrow (New York: Oxford, 1986), pp. 301-307.
Russian professor Igor Bestuzhev-Lada, writing in a 1988 issue of the Moscow
weekly Nedelya, suggested that during the Stalin era alone (1935-1953), as
many as 50 million people were killed, condemned to camps from which they
never emerged, or lost their lives as a direct result of the brutal
"dekulakization" campaign against the peasantry. "Soviets admit Stalin
killed 50 million," The Sunday Times, London, April 17, 1988.; R. J. Rummel,
a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has recently
calculated that 61.9 million people were systematically killed by the Soviet
Communist regime from 1917 to 1987. R. J. Rummel, Lethal Politics: Soviet
Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917 (Transaction, 1990).
Because of his revolutionary activities, Lenin was sentenced in 1897 to
three years exile in Siberia. During this period of "punishment," he got
married, wrote some 30 works, made extensive use of a well-stocked local
library, subscribed to numerous foreign periodicals, kept up a voluminous
correspondence with supporters across Europe, and enjoyed numerous sport
hunting and ice skating excursions, while all the time receiving a state
stipend. See: Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 42-57.; P. N.
Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966),
pp. 55-75.
R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 187-188.;
The Nation, June 24, 1991, p. 838.
Bill Keller, "Cult of the Last Czar," The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
"Nostalgic for Nicholas, Russians Honor Their Last Czar," Los Angeles Times,
July 18, 1993.; "Ceremony marks Russian czar's death," Orange County
Register, July 17, 1993.
R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Appendix
A striking feature of Mr. Wilton's examination of the tumultuous 1917-1919
period in Russia is his frank treatment of the critically important Jewish
role in establishing the Bolshevik regime.

The following lists of persons in the Bolshevik Party and Soviet
administration during this period, which Wilton compiled on the basis of
official reports and original documents, underscore the crucial Jewish role
in these bodies. These lists first appeared in the rare French edition of
Wilton's book, published in Paris in 1921 under the title Les Derniers Jours
des Romanoffs. They did not appear in either the American or British
editions of The Last Days of the Romanors published in 1920.

"I have done all in my power to act as an impartial chronicler," Wilton
wrote in his foreword to Les Derniers Jours des Romanoffs. "In order not to
leave myself open to any accusation of prejudice, I am giving the list of
the members of the [Bolshevik Party' s] Central Committee, of the
Extraordinary Commission [Cheka or secret police], and of the Council of
Commissars functioning at the time of the assassination of the Imperial
family.

"The 62 members of the [Central] Committee were composed of five Russians,
one Ukrainian, six Letts [Latvians], two Germans, one Czech, two Armenians,
three Georgians, one Karaim [Karaite] (a Jewish sect), and 41 Jews.

"The Extraordinary Commission [Cheka or Vecheka] of Moscow was composed of
36 members, including one German, one Pole, one Armenian, two Russians,
eight Latvians, and 23 Jews.

"The Council of the People's Commissars [the Soviet .government] numbered
two Armenians, three Russians, and 17 Jews.

"Ac.cording to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important
functionaries of the Bolshevik state, including the above-mentioned, in
1918-1919 there were: 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35
Letts [Latvians], 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles,
three Finns, one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews."

"If the reader is astonished to find the Jewish hand everywhere in the
affair of the assassination of the Russian Imperial family, he must bear in
mind the formidable numerical preponderance of Jews in the Soviet
administration," Wilton went on to write.

Effective governmental power, Wilton continued (on pages 136-138 of the same
edition) is in the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party. In 1918, he
reported, this body had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin,
and three were of Russian ancestry. The nine Jews were: Bronstein (Trotsky),
Apfelbaum (Zinoviev), Lurie (Larine), Uritsky, Volodarski, Rosenfeld
(Kamenev), Smidovich, Sverdlov (Yankel), and Nakhamkes (Steklov). The three
Russians were: Ulyanov (Lenin), Krylenko, and Lunacharsky.

"The other Russian Socialist parties are similar in composition," Wilton
went on. "Their Central Committees are made up as follows:"

Mensheviks (Social Democrats): Eleven members, all of whom are Jewish.

Communists of the People: Six members, of whom five are Jews and one is a
Russian.

Social Revolutionaries (Right Wing): Fifteen members, of whom 13 are Jews
and two are Russians (Kerenski, who may be of Jewish origin, and
Tchaikovski).

Social Revolutionaries (Left Wing): Twelve members, of whom ten are Jews and
two are Russians.

Committee of the Anarchists of Moscow: Five members, of whom four are Jews
and one is a Russian.

Polish Communist Party: Twelve members, all of whom are Jews, including
Sobelson (Radek), Krokhenal (Zagonski), and Schwartz (Goltz).

"These parties," commented Wilton, "in appearance opposed to the Bolsheviks,
play the Bolsheviks' game on the sly, more or less, by preventing the
Russians from pulling themselves together. Out of 61 individuals at the head
of these parties, there are six Russians and 55 Jews. No matter what may be
the name adopted, a revolutionary government will be Jewish."

[Although the Bolsheviks permitted these leftist political groups to operate
for a time under close supervision and narrow limits, even these pitiful
remnants of organized opposition were thoroughly eliminated by the end of
the 1921 .]

The Soviet government, or "Council of People's Commissars' (also known as
the "Sovnarkom") was made up of the following, Wilton reported:

Peoples Commissariat (Ministry) Name Nationality
Chairman V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Foreign Affairs G.V. Chicherin Russian
Nationalities J. Dzhugashvili [Stalin] Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Economic Council Lourie (Larin) Jew
Food Supply A.G. Schlikhter Jew
Army and Navy [Military] L.D. Bronstein (Trotski) Jew
State Control K.I. Lander Jew
State Lands Kaufmann Jew
Works [Labor] V. Schmidt Jew
Social Relief E. Lilina (Knigissen) Jew
Education A. Lunacharsky Russian
Religion Spitzberg Jew
Interior Apfelbaum [Radomyslski] (Zinoviev) Jew
.Hygiene Anvelt Jew
Finance I. E. Gukovs [and G. Sokolnikov] Jew
Press Voldarski [Goldstein] Jew
Elections M.S. Uritsky Jew
Justice I.Z. Shteinberg Jew
Refugees Fenigstein Jew
Refugees Savitch (Assistant) Jew
Refugees Zaslovski (Assistant) Jew

Out of these 22 "Sovnarkom" members, Wilton summed'up, there were three
Russians, one Georgian, one Armenian, and 17 Jews.

The Central Executive Committee, Wilton continues, was made up of the
following members:

Y. M. Sverdlov [Solomon] (Chairman) Jew
Avanesov (Secretary) Armenian
Bruno Latvian
Breslau Latvian [?]
Babtchinski Jew
N. I. Bukharin Russian
Weinberg Jew
Gailiss Jew
Ganzberg [Ganzburg ] Jew
Danichevski Jew
Starck German
Sachs Jew
Scheinmann Jew
Erdling Jew
Landauer Jew
Linder Jew
Wolach Czech
S. Dimanshtein Jew
Encukidze Georgian
Ermann Jew
A. A. Ioffe Jew
Karkhline Jew
Knigissen Jew
Rosenfeld (Kamenev) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) Jew
N. Krylenko Russian
Krassikov Jew
Kaprik Jew
Kaoul Latvian
Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Latsis Jew
Lander Jew
Lunacharsky Russian
Peterson Latvian
Peters Latvian
Roudzoutas Jew
Rosine Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Stoutchka Latvian
Nakhamkes (Steklov) Jew
Sosnovski Jew
Skrytnik Jew
L. Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Teodorovitch Jew [?]
Terian Armenian
Uritsky Jew
Telechkine Russian
Feldmann Jew
Fromkin Jew
Souriupa Ukrainian
Tchavtchevadze Georgian
Scheikmann Jew
Rosental Jew
Achkinazi Imeretian [?]
Karakhane Karaim [Karaite]
Rose Jew
Sobelson (Radek) Jew
Schlichter Jew
Schikolini Jew
Chklianski Jew
Levine-(Pravdine) Jew

Thus, concluded Wilton, out of 61 members, five were Russians, six were
Latvians, one was a German, two were Armenians, one was a Czech, one was an
Imeretian, two were Georgians, one was a Karaim, one. was a Ukrainian, and
41 were Jews.

The Extraordinary Commission of Moscow (Cheka) 'the Soviet secret police and
predecessor of the GPU, the NKVD and the KGB was made up of the following:

F. Dzerzhinsky (Chairman) Pole
Y. Peters (Deputy Chairman) Latvian
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jew
Karlson Latvian
Schaumann Latvian
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Galperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Katzis Latvian
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Latvian
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlov (Brother of president of the Central Executive Committee) Jew
Biesenski Jew
J. Blumkin (Count Mirbach's assassin) Jew
Alexandrovitch (Blumkin's accomplice) Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Latvian
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Latvian
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Latvian

Of these 36 Cheka officials, one was a Pole, one a German, one an Armenian,
two were Russians, eight were Latvians, and 23 were Jews.

"Accordingly," Wilton sums up, "there is no reason to be surprised at the
preponderant role of Jews in the assassination of the Imperial family. It is
rather the opposite that would have been surprising."


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Bibliographic information Author:
Weber, Mark
Title:
The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet
Regime
Source:
The Journal for Historical Review (http://www.ihr.org)
Date:
January/February 1994
Issue:
Volume 14 number 1
Location:
Page 4
ISSN:
0195-6752
Attribution: "Reprinted from The Journal of Historical Review, PO Box 2739,
Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. Domestic subscriptions $40 per year; foreign
subscriptions $60 per year."
Please send a copy of all reprints to the Editor.

Robert Wilton, Russia's Agony (1918) and The Last Days of the Romanovs
(1920). Wilton was correspondent of the Times of London at St Petersburg.
Peter Myers, ***@cyberone.com.au, April 19, 2001; update May 4, 2003.

You are at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/wilton.html.

Wilton documents that the October Revolution was a Jewish Revolution, led by
"Pseudo Jews", i.e. Jews who had renounced religion, many of whom had come
from Western Europe with Lenin, or from America with Trotsky. Even religious
Jews were afraid of them; the viciousness of the Bolsheviks arose from
Jewish alienation from things Russian. Wilton says that, assimilation of
Jews in Poland and other countries having failed, the only solution to the
Jewish Question is Zionism.

The 1920 book is presented here first, because it gives the suppressed facts
on who led the Bolshevik Revolution; the 1918 book gives more explanatory
material.

(1) The Last Days of the Romanovs (2) Russia's Agony by Robert Wilton

(1) The Last Days of the Romanovs by Robert Wilton, London, Thornton
Butterworth Limited, 1920.

{p. 26} Nonentities, figureheads of the Sovnarkom, do not interest us. We
are concerned with great, if maleficient, personages in

{p. 27} the Red world. Most of them are still unknown outside the ranks of
professional revolutionaries. A goodly proportion of the hundred Jews who
came out of Germany with Lenin, and the hundreds who came from Chicago,
deserve to be included in this gallery, for they undoubtedly held Russia
under their sway. To enumerate and describe them would require a small
volume. I need sketch only those who act prominently in the drama of
Ekaterinburg. The most important were: Sverdlov, Safarov, Voikov, and
Goloshcheckin, and the murderer-in-chief, Yurovsky. Others will be
introduced later on.

The names of Safarov and Voikov figure in the list of Lenin's
fellow-passengers. Both are very powerful Bolsheviks, holding high places in
the executive and police branches. Sverdlov was the uncrowned Tsar of the
Soviets. His authority was for more than a year higher than that of Lenin or
even Trotsky.

{p. 125} When the Jewish murderers and their accomplices, the German-Magyar
'Letts,' had taken wing before the advance of the Whites, these prisoners
were sent to Perm for future disposal, while they themselves had hurried
westward, having helped to accomplish the hellish design of the Jew fiend,
Yankel Sverdlov - to exterminate 'all the Romanovs.' Others had already
preceded them to Perm, and the design had been fully accomplished there. The
murder of the Romanovs at Perm took place exactly twenty-four hours after
the murder of the family at Ekaterinburg.

{p. 146} But why all these precautions? If the people are so anxious to try
and punish their late ruler, why resort to all manner of subterfuges, both
in committing the 'execution' and in acquainting the people with the death
of their 'oppressor'?

The answer is a simple one: Sverdlov and his associates were not sure of the
people. The reason of that is equally simple: they were not Russians; they
were Jews. They

{p. 147} were 'internationalists,' repudiating all nationality, yet
disguised under Russian names. The Russians in their midst were dupes or
dummies. Krassin might come to clear the ground, but Apfelbaum-Kamenev
appeared for the serious work. What happened in London in 1920 is comparable
in a modest way with the Red mechanism in Russia itself.

Taken according to numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten;
among the komisars that rule Bolshevik Russia they are nine in ten - if
anything, the proportion of Jews is still higher.

These men feared the Russian people, they feared the Romanovs because they
were Russians, they feared Nicholas Romanov because he had been a Russian
Tsar, and when he refused to be seduced from his loyalty to his people and
to the Allies they resolved that he should die - he and all the Romanovs.
This resolve was carried out when the advance of anti-Bolshevik forces gave
a reasonable hope of sophisticating the crime and avoiding a just
punishment. And so definite was Jew-ruled Moscow on the necessity of the
ex-Tsar's death that a whole month before the murder the report persisted
that Nicholar II was dead.

{p. 148} The Germans knew what they were doing when they sent Lenin's pack
of Jews into Russia. They chose them as agents of destruction. Why? Because
the Jews were not Russians and to them the destruction of Russia was all in
the way of business, revolutionary or financial. The whole record of
Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien
invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov
(who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews
Goloschekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yukovsky, is the act not of
the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.

The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians: the
'burgess' Ulianov, alias Lenin, the 'noble' Chicherin, the 'dissenter'
Bonch-Bruevich. They are all mere screens or dummies behind which the
Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews of Sovdepia continue their work of
destruction; having wrecked and plundered Russia by appealing to the
ignorance of the working folk, they are now using their dupes to set up a
new tyranny worse than any that the world has known.

Sovietdom has consecrated three heroes to whom monuments have been erected:

to Karl Marx, to Judas Iscariot, and to Leo Tolstoi, the three names that
are assocuated with Revolution, Apostasy, and Anarchism; two of them Jews.

When the Jew Kanegisser assassinated the Jew Uritsky, the Soviets ordained a
Terror throughout the land. Rivers of Russian blood had to wipe away the
stain caused by a Jew who dared to oppose the Jewish rulers of unhappy
Russia.

{p. 153} To bring the Tsar or the Tsarevich to Moscow would involve risks.
The Jews were in a fright; telegrams discovered in Ekaterinburg show that
they trusted none of the Russians in their employ. That is why the Romanovs
remained in Ekaterinburg.

{p. 155} In the autumn of 1915 there assembled in Vienna the representatives
of the German and Austrian General Staffs to discuss a plan for the
promotion of a revolutionary movement in Russia. It was then that all the
outlines of the 'Russian' revolution were laid down; it was at that meeting
that the leading actors in the Red tragedy were chosen: the Lenins and the
Sverdlovs and the host of Jewish wreckers, who spent the interval between
their engagement and their appearance on the Russian stage in the calm of
Swiss resorts, studying and rehearsing their parts.

The money that financed the 'Russian' revolution was German money, and - I
say it on the strongest evidence which can be corroborated in the German
secret archives - YYANKEL SVERDLOV RECEIVED A SALARY FROM THE GERMANS TILL
NOVEMBER 7, 1917, when, becoming Red Tsar of All the Russias, he had at his
disposal loot unimaginable. {end quotes}

(2) Russia's Agony by Robert Wilton, London, Edward Arnold, 1918. {Footnotes
are included thus}

{p. 56} For a proper examination of the situation in Russia under the Old
Regime, and more particularly of the events that occurred during the
Revolution, it becomes necessary to deal at some length with the position of
the Jews. It had an intimate bearing upon all that happened in 1917.

Something like six millions of Jews inhabited the Russian empire at the
beginning of the war. They were twice as numerous as the Germans, with whom
they were largely associated in business. Their numbers had been enormously
increased as the result of an evil act - the partition of Poland at the end
of the eighteenth century. By this political blunder Russia strengthened the
Brandenburg-Prussian realm, and saddled herself with the Polish and Jewish
questions. Thereby she was destined to come, sooner or later, into direct
collision with the Germans and to find herself handicapped in her struggle.

The ancestors of the Polish Jews had fled from Germany to escape
persecution. But they brought with them a deep-rooted association with that
country. During the centuries of abode in Teutonic lands they had evolved a
specific language called Yiddish, a German jargon. They acted as a sort of
advance guard of German penetration. In Poland they enjoyed a large measure
of freedom.

{p. 57} All business was in their hands. They acted as agents to the great
landlords. The urban population was - and remains - mostly Jewish. But Poles
and Jews lived peacefully enough together. The Jews certainly had the best
of the bargain; they prospered, and were not ungrateful. They helped the
Poles with money during the insurrections of 1831 and 1863.

Thirty years ago the Poles began to go into business for themselves.
Competition arose. The landlords started agricultural associations to shake
off the Jewish monopoly. A rift betokened itself, and has been growing ever
since, - effectively discrediting Assimilationist theories, largely based
upon the earlier and one-sided adjustment of Polish and Jewish interests.
{see footnote 1}

Old Russia tried vainly to denationalize the Poles, and, obeying the
dictates of self-preservation, to prevent the Jews from spreading eastward.
This was the origin of the Pale.

No Jew was supposed to enjoy rights of residence, roughly speaking, east of
the Dnieper. The Little Russians had become more or less inured to Jewish
methods, and were left to bear the brunt of an ever-increasing Jewish
element. For every Jewish boy and girl had to marry and produce a numerous
progeny. Such was the Talmudic law. Unpermitted to hold lands and
incapacitated for husbandry, the Jewish masses filled the twons and
settlements, managing to eke out a miserable existence, living under the
menace of pogroms, which exploited Gentiles were ready to perpetrate
whenever the police gave the signal.

That the enforcement of the Pale system would lead to abuses was to be
expected. Jews could not own land or reside outside specified settlements,
even within the

{footnote 1} The history of Polish politics during the past three decades
does not enter within the scope of this book. In the author's opinion, based
on long residence in Poland, it should afford convincing evidence of the
utter failure of Assimilation or of any solution of the Jewish problem
except Zionism. {end footnote}

{p. 58} Pale. The police were able to levy blackmail for all kinds of real
or alleged infractions of this rule. Wealthier Jews could always evade it by
means of bribery. Without this source of income the police could not,
indeed, have made ends meet. Their pay and allowances were ludicrously
insufficient. But with the help of the Jewish revenue they accumulated
comfortable fortunes. Thus the police had an interest in the Jews so long as
the Pale was maintained, and tolerated or prompted pogroms only when the
okhrana judged them to be necessary. We shall see how this system of
corruption gradually affected the whole Empire.

In addition to his inborn propensity for the accumulation of riches, the Jew
living within the Pale was incited thereto by the degrading position of his
impecunious co-religionary. The poorest peasant lived like a prince in
comparison with the average Jew. A piece of herring, an onion, and a crust
of bread formed the Jew's diet. Dirt, squalor, and privation were his
destined portion. Besides, the pogroms affected rich and poor alike. Was it
surprising that the Jew strove to escape from the Pale by fair means or
foul, and that to him the lands east of the Dnieper seemed like a Canaan, a
land flowing with milk and honey, where he might wax rich and live secure?
But how could the moneyless Jew hope to reach it? The struggle to gain
affluence was naturally intense. Only the craftiest and least scrupulous
could hope to raise their heads above the seething mass of Jewish pauperdom.

Among this suffering multitude the devil of class-hatred raised a fearsome
harvest. The teachings of Karl Marx, a German Jew, were here decocted in
their quintessence and spread by migrants from the Pale into more favoured
lands - into the heart of Russia, into England and far America. Like many a
noisome malady that has come to afflict mankind from the Near and Farther
East, the worst political poisons exuded from the Pale.

{p. 59} The rich and poor among the Jews were bound together by ties of
religion and charity. The wealthier Israelites gave of their abundance to
the less fortunate ones of their faith. But this bond was not a
comprehensive one. Certain important elements repudiated it by severing all
ties with Jewry. For apostasy was one of the manifold evils arising out of
Jewish disabilities. The poorer Jew could also break open the door of his
prison by passing stringent academic tests. Then he went into the cities, an
isolated, needy adventurer, quickly losing his faith, dominated by thirst
for vengeance, seeing in the most violent political creeds and methods an
appeal to redress the wrongs of his people, and ready to implicate the
bourgeois Jew and the Gentile in his feelings of class and political hatred.

Through the schools the Jew sought to satisfy his desire for freedom rather
than a thirst for learning. University degrees gave certain rights and
privileges, including the right to travel or reside anywhere in Russia.
Every Jewish boy strove to enter a university. For this purpose he had to
matriculate through a high school. The proportion of Jews admissable had to
be limited, however, or they would have swamped the "gymnasia" within the
Pale. Only the very cleverest Jewish boys could gain access to the State
schools and eventually enter the university. And the proportion of Jewish
undergraduates was also restricted. It represented more than double the
Jewish to the Gentile population, but that did not satisfy Jewish appetites.
Handicapped, the Jews yet managed to exceed the norm at the close of their
studies, because they were more persistent and could endure greater
privations than the poorest Russian student. An outcry was raised when the
Ministry of Education insisted on refusing further admittance to Jewish
undergraduates until the proportions had been readjusted.

Attempting to safeguard the Russians from the Jewish encroachment became
more pronounced and desperate

{p. 60} as the tide of Hebrew invasion rose higher, and - I may add - as
outcasts from Jewry developed revolutionary tendencies. The Jews were slowly
but surely pervading all the lucrative professions: the Bar and medicine
{footnote 1: They had almost monopolized them by the time the Revolution
broke out.} and to a lesser degree art and literature. They had small
inclination for science or engineering. Commissions in the Army and Navy
were barred to them. Commerce and industry could not appeal to the
impecunious Jew. These lucrative branches were reserved for wealthy Hebrews,
who, by payment of a certain Guild tax (amounting to about £100 per annum),
could reside everywhere. In banking and industries the Jews became
all-pervasive, as in the Press. They were confidants of Grand Dukes. The
bureaucracy tried to restrain their irresistible sway by introducing
senseless restrictions. For instance, a Jew could not be freely elected to
boards of companies.

Numerous methods of evading the law of residence arose. Dentists' and
chemists' assistants and certain artificers were granted partial exemptions.
These callings were glutted with Jews. "Colleges" sprung up which did a
profitable trade in "diplomas." The police readily winked at irregularities
for a consideration. Petrograd was full of Jews who had no legal right of
residence. They lived in suburban districts on payment of a "private tax" to
the police, who watched over their interests paternally, and were disposed
to molest only those Jews who had a right to reside there.

It becomes clear that the purpose for which the Pale and all the other
anti-Jewish restrictions had been devised was mistaken and mischievous. It
defeated itself. It led to the penetration of Russia by Hebrew elements of
the most aggressive kind which had severed themselves from Jewry - had
become pseudo-Jews - while it left the Jewish masses to suffer in congestion
and misery. ...

{p. 61} No instigation was necessary to provoke pogroms. They would have
occurred oftener if the police had not interfered. The Little Russian,
Lithuanian or Polish peasants, wrecked Jewish shops whenever Jewish
"expolitation" assumed intensive forms. A similar phenomenon had been
observed in Austria-Hungary, {footnote 1: H. Wickham Steed, the Hapsburg
Monarchy.} and recurrence in Russia since the Revolution puts an end to the
fiction that the police alone were responsible. Indeed, the frequency of
pogroms during 1917 was all the more remarkable because Revolutionary Russia
was disposed to champion the Jews as a race that had been oppressed by the
Old Regime.

Another point must be explained before I leave the Jewish question. When the
Russian armies entered Poland at the beginning of the war many regiments
from other parts of the Empire knew little or nothing about the Jews. The
soldiers had a religious prejudice against them and also a certain contempt,
because the Jews systematically evaded service in the ranks. Here they found
enormous populations of Jews who were obsequious and omniscient. Jewish
"factors" supplied them with anything for money, even drink. To ingratiate
themselves with officers and men they would tell them - long anticipating
official knowledge - of promotions and of impending transfers of units. As
the Germans displayed by means of derisive placards hoisted over the
trenches a similar knowledge of military secrets, the idea gained ground
that the Jews were spying in the interests of Germany. "Telephone" wires
discovered around Jewish houses confirmed this suspicion. It is interesting
to note that the Jews had a habit of "wiring" their houses in order to evade
some of the Talmudic laws of ritual and other observances. This simple
explanation accounts for many of the cruelties to which Jews were unjustly
subjected. Let me add that to my knowledge Jewish soldiers of the right sort
performed many gallant deeds - worthy of their remote ancestors, the
Maccabeans.

{p. 137} Subversion had been carried out by a handful of pseudo-Jew
Extremists in the Soviet, {see footnote 1} but the Soviet was a

{footnote 1} Afterwards their numbers increased largely, and although they
studiously concealed their identity under assumed Russian or Polish names,
it became known that the principal ones were: Nahamkez-Steklov,
Apfelbaum-Zinoviev, Rosenfeldt-Kamenev, Goldmann-Gorev, Goldberg-Mekowski,
Zederbaum-Martov, {continued on p. 138}

{p. 138} party to the traitorous business. Most of the leaders - especially
the pseudo-Jews - were a truculent pack, cowering behind the soldiery,
intent upon realizing their revolutionary "ideals," but terrified by a
possibility of failure and eventual reprisals. ...

{footnote continued from p. 137} Himmer-Sukhanov, Krachman-Zagorski,
Hollander-Mieshkowski, Lourier-Larin, Seffer-Bogdanov. Among the leaders of
this gang - under Lenin - were: Trotsky, whose real name was Bronstein, and
Feldmann, alias Chernov. He came to Russia in April, travelling from
Switzerland and through Germany in a "sealed carriage" with Rebert Grimm,
Mme Kolontay, etc., at a time when Austria, with Germany's approval,
proposed "separate terms" to the Provisional Government. He had been amply
provided with funds by a "wealthy lady" in Zurich. He "requisitioned" a
ballet-dancer's villa opposite the fortress and preached the doctrines of
Bolshevism. Having stirred up a revolt in July to defeat Kerensky's
"offensive," he was permitted to go back into seclusion. It is said he went
to Germany. He came back to carry out the final "victory" of Bolshevism with
the aid of Bronstein-Trotsky, who had been a refugee after the troubles of
1905, when he had been Vice-President of the Labour Soviet. He had been
expelled from France for anti-war agitation and before the revolution went
to America. His detention at Halifax aroused the greatest fury in the Soviet
against the British Government, and as "Minister for Foreign Affairs" in the
Lenin "cabinet" he gave full vent to his feelings of revenge for his
detention.

{p. 145} I was absent from Petrograd, having gone to the Front. My friends
in the Capital afterwards related to me what had happened. One of them was
at the Tauris Palace,

{p. 146} where the Soviet still had its headquarters. He related that the
building was full of Jews - reporters and others - who were in terror of
being captured by the partisans of the Bolshevik-Jews.

{p. 147} When General Polovtsov came to apprehend two of the Bolshevik
ringleaders, he found Kerensky at their quarters, and from him received
orders to leave them alone. When General Polovtsov proceeded to disarm the
Red Guard, he was forbidden to do so by orders from Prince Lvov, "in
compliance with the wishes of the Soviet."

{p. 174} Moreover, the Press, almost entirely in Jewish hands, had gone over
to the Soviet, and Moderate organs that would not publish the Soviet
proclamations glorifying spoilation and promoting Anarchy had been summarily
"expropriated" on behalf of newly founded Socialist publications. The
revolutionary pseudo-Jews were thus destroying Russia's hopes of a national
revival and dragging the country into disaster. Yound and old, these zealots
intensified revolutionary passions. Through the Press they already wielded
enormous power and were capturing other channels of control, the Committees
and the militia (police).

I called attention at the time to both these dangers. On April 8th I
reported on the Soviet's plans "to bring about the defeat of the Russian
armies and a dishonourable peace." Pacifist members of the House of Commons
raised a great outcry, and M. Miliukov, who was attempting the impossible
task of reconciling the Soviet's programme with sober dictates of Allied
policy, indirectly supported the "Allied" pacifists. On March 26th I
reported from Riga on the pernicious influence of Jewish Extremists. But
this appeal to moderation was wilfully distorted by the Jewish Press. Facts
cited by me on the best authority were "proved" to be non-existent, and a
campaign of slander and intimidation followed. Later on M. Vinaver, the
eminent Jewish Deputy, admitted in conversation with me that Nahamkez and
his ilk were a greater danger to the Jews than to the Russians. I felt that
I had done my duty in calling attention to the ominous feature of the
situation, and refer to these incidents here simply to show how impossible
it was then to speak the truth about Russia. The Soviet regime was far worse
than the okhrana. I know that on one occasion, at least, the okhrana had
contemplated my

{p. 175} expulsion for writing too freely about the Old Regime. Now, I was
threatened with nothing less than murder. Under the dispensation of
"freedom" applied by the Soviet, the truth had become unpalatable and
dangerous in Petrograd and inacceptable in London.

Behind the veil thus dropped by the Soviet and its pseudo-Jewish supporters,
British and French pacifists worked unremittingly for the success of the
Soviet plan. The respective Governments encouraged Socialist deputations to
come and "convert" the Russian Revolutionaries, who knew infinitely more
about revolution than did these "innocents." It was even rumoured in
Petrograd that Mr. Arthur Henderson would succeed Sir George Buchanan. The
French experiment with M. Albert Thomas had not, however, proved a success.
The Allies dealt with a proposal to hold an international congress in
Stockhomlm, initiated by the Soviet in furtherance of its schemes. Oceans of
ink were expended on this subject before the real motives of the Soviet were
understood. Meanwhile some of the "missionaries" had themselves been
"converted."

Another lamentable feature of the revolutionary period was the constant
passage of Russian and pseudo-Jew revolutionaries from Allied countries.
Every shipload that came from America, England or France gave trouble. The
exiles would go straight from the train to the Field of Mars and "stir up"
the revolutionary pot. Whether "martyrs of Tsarism" or merely German spies,
they all considered themselves to be entitled to a share in the spoils, and
had to be provided with "fat places" in the Food, Agrarian, and other
Committees. To these shipments we owed the advent of Bronstein-Trotsky and
other Bolsheviki.

{p. 326} From the early times of revolutionary activity there had been a
"split" among the Jews, separating the bourgeois pseudo-Jew extremist. It
assumed a marked character when the pseudo-Jews of the Soviet and their
fellow-apostates in the Socialist ranks revealed themselves in their true
anarchical colours. Some of the Bolshevist and Maximalist pseudo-Jews even
"recanted" on realizing the consequences of their own doctrines, and
dissociated themselves from Leninism.

Our successes in Palestine should enable the Allies to provide a solution
for two great problems. The greater is the Jewish problem, which cannot be
solved except by enabling the Jews to become once more a nation in Zion. The
second one is the Armenian problem. {end of transcript}

Dietrich Eckart, Rosenberg, and White Russian
Creators of Nazi Ideology, P2
Hitler, who relied greatly upon White Russians from like Eckart, Aufbau, and
Scheubner-Richter's advice, with regard to both domestic and foreign
affairs, repeatedly spoke of the theme espoused by Aufbau and Eckart that
Jewish finance capitalism stood behind socialism in general and Bolshevism
in particular. In a June 1922 speech, he attributed the perils that faced
Germany to the East and the West to Jewish capital. Similar to the above,
Hitler claimed that -Chinese henchmen in Moscow and black ones on the Rhine
stand as cultural guardians of Jewish capitalism.(1)

In Mein Kampf, he wrote of Bolshevism in "Russia" as a means "to give a gang
of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great
people."(2) In his unpublished sequel to Mein Kampf from 1928 which he
primarily dealt with foreign policy matters, he asserted, "the national
White Russia fought against the Jewish-international-capitalist Red
Revolution," (3)

Aufbau's views that the Jews used Bolshevism for the purposes of capitalist
exploitation thus not only found expression in Hitler's early speeches, but
in his later ideological works as well.

During the time of his close political collaboration with Aufbau, Hitler
often spoke of circumstances inside of the Soviet Union to back his claims
of Jewish finance capitalism lurking behind Bolshevism. stressing that the
National Socialist Parly firmly believed that the gathering Bolshevik
revolution in Germany "will not concern a struggle between the bourgeoisie
and the proletariat, for, as in Russia, both will become the slaves of him
who has seduced the one and led the other, the Jew."(4)

By 1923, Hitler had thoroughly internalized Aufbau's and the people around
it, assertions, of the nature of socialism and its most aggressive variant
Bolshevism as mere tools of Jewish finance capitalism to enslave European
peoples.

In his racial ideology of Jews versus "Aryans," Hitler drew upon voelkisch
ideology, plus internalized the convictions of the circles around Aufbau,
that not only did Jewish financers back Bolshevism, the Bolshevik regime
represented an almost strictly Jewish undertaking: Scheubner-Richter
asserted that approximately 80% to 90% of Soviet Commissars were Jews. On
one occasion, he asserted that the -outrageous terror" in the former Russian
Empire represented the "revenge of the Jews against the Russian people. (5)

And claimed that "the greatest danger that threatens Germany is not the
black and white French, but Jewish Bolshevism." (6) Even at the time of
French/Belgian occupation of the Ruhr, Scheubner- Richter stressed the
primacy of the "Jewish Bolshevik" peril.

Vinberg offered precise figures of the nature of "Jewish Bolshevism,"
claimed in his book "Der Kreuzesweg Russlands" that 545 people exercised
dictatorial control over "Russia," of which 447 were Jews. (7)

Notes that Hitler made for a November 1922 speech demonstrate Vinberg's
influence over his thinking on the "Jewish question." Hitler cited "Vinberg"
[sic] to the effect that the Soviet Union represented a "Jewish state." (8)

In addition to arguing in the pages of Eckart's newspaper "Auf gut deutsch"
that approximately 90% of Soviet Commissars were Jews, Vinberg's ideological
comrade and Nazi ideologist Rosenberg, wrote In the Voelkischer Bcobachter
in August 1921 that "the names of all the Jewish executioners are available,
of 550 governmental Commissars,... 457 are Jews!" (9)

Eckart asserted in February 1920 that out of , 422 of the 457 Soviet
Commissars were Jewish.(10) In a November 1920 article in Auf gut deutsch.
Eckart cited a British source that placed the current figures at 574 Soviet
Commissars, of whom 466 were Jews.(11)

Hitler, similarly claimed in an August 1920 speech that of 478 Soviet
delegates, 430 were Jews.(12)

1) Hitler. Speech on June 22. 1922. Saemtliche Aufzeichnungen. 645.

2) Hitler. Mein Kampf trans. Ralph Mannheim, 1943, 326.

3) Hitler. Hitlers Zweites Buch: Ein Dokument aus dem Jahr 1928 (Stuttgart:
Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. 1961), 153. 154.

4) Hitler, speech on January 18. 1923. Saemtliche Aufzeichnungen, 796.

5) Scheubner-Richter. "Nansen verteidigt den Bolschewismus,"
Aufbau-Korrespondenz. April 19. 1923. 4.

6) Scheubner-Richter. "Der BoIschewismus sprungbereit!."
Aufbau-Korrespondenz. September 29. 1923. 2.

7) Vinberg, Der Kreueszug Russlands. 5, 20. 26, 28.

8) Hitler. notes for speech on November 2, 1922. Saemtliche Aufzeichnungen.
713,

9) Rosenberg, "Hochverrat der deutschen Zionisten auf Grund ihrer eigenen
Eingestaendnisse." Auf gut deutsch. March 31. 1921; Rosenberg. "Der Pogrom
am deutschen und am russischen Volke." Voelkischer Beobachter. August 4.
1921. 3.

10) Eckart, "Die Schlacht auf den Katalaunischen Feldern." Auf gut deutch.
February 20. 1920. 12.

11) Eckart. "*Jewry ueber alles." Auf gut duetsch, November 26, 1920.

12) Hitler. Speech on August 6. 1920. Saemtliche Aufzeichnungen, 172.


P.1 Hitler's Secret "Protocols" P.1
P.2 Hitler's Secret "Protocols" P.2
P.3 Hitler's Source P.1
P.4 Hitler's Source P.2
P.5 The German Kaiser's Confident P.1
P.6 The German Kaiser's Confident P.2
P.7 The Ideologists and First Financiers of Hitler P.1
P.8 The Ideologists and First Financiers of Hitler P.2
P.9 Dietrich Eckart, Rosenberg, and White Russian Creators of Nazi Ideology,
P.1
P.10 Dietrich Eckart, Rosenberg, and White Russian Creators of Nazi
Ideology, P.2
P.11 The "Final" Solution Before WWII, P.1
P.12 The "Final" Solution Before WWII, P.2
P.13 Early Nazis and the Mystical Connection P.1
P.14 Early Nazis and the Mystical Connection P.2
P.15 Early Nazis and the Mystical Connection P.3


Jewish conquest of the Slavs (Jewish Bolshevism) Prytulak Cheka-GPU-NKVD in
Ukraine -25May98 R_1119

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

__From__: Reginald H . C . McTavish
__Subject__: Jewish conquest of the Slavs (Jewish Bolshevism) Prytulak
Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine -25May98 R_1119
__Date__: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:10:40 -0600

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

LESSONS IN HISTORY -- MORE PROOF BOLSHEVISM WAS JEWISH!

http://www.ukar.org/shapov01.shtml
(Link active June 27, 2003. Archived locally as: shapov01)

EXCERPTED <FAIR USE INTENDED -- NON-PROFIT>

Terms of a truce: Were I authorized to represent the Ukrainian position in
negotiating with Jews a cessation of verbal hostilities, I might open with
"If
you stop fabricating lies about us, we will stop disclosing the truth about
you."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prytulak Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine 25May98 Jewish conquest of the
Slavs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The Shapoval volume, then, provides us with one such reason why some
Ukrainian
anti-Semitism might exist. The reason is that Ukrainians have been aware of
the
Jewish domination of the experiment in government through mass murder which
went
under the name of "Communism," and in which experiment Ukrainians more than
any
other peoples have been conscripted into playing the role of guinea pigs.

Jewish Conquest of the Slavs

The Shapoval volume. The analyses that I present below are based on
information
in the following book written in Ukrainian, with some of its documentation
presented in Russian:

Yuri Shapoval, Volodymyr Prystaiko, and Vadym Zolotariov, Cheka-GPU-NKVD in
Ukraine: People, Facts, Documents, Abris, Kyiv, 1997.

For the sake of brevity, I will refer to the above book as "the Shapoval
volume."

Sponsorship. It is possibly highly significant that this book was sponsored
by
the following:

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
M. S. Hrushevsky Institute
of Ukrainian Archaeography and Fontology
Security Service of Ukraine

----------------------------

Nationalities in the Cheka-GPU-NKVD. One may summarize my chief finding with
this succinct approximation:

Out of every 10 senior members
of the Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine:
6 were Jewish,
2 were Russian,
1 was Ukrainian, and
1 was other.

Latvians. Latvians led in the "other" category. More specifically:
NATIONALITY NUMBER INVOLVED PERCENTAGE
Jewish=92 + Father Jewish=1 93 58.1
Russian 34 21.3
Ukrainian 15 9.4
Latvian (M)=6 + (F)=1 7 4.4
Belarusian 3 1.9
Polish 2 1.3
Polish/German 1 .6
Armenian 1 .6
Georgian 1 .6
German 1 .6
Lithuanian 1 .6
Moldovan 1 .6

Total known nationality 160 100
Unknown nationality 23
Total 183

Almost no mixed parentage. Given that the authors noted the instance in
which
only the father was Jewish, it would appear that there are no other
instances of
known mixed parentage in this sample.

Almost no females. In Ukrainian, the word for "a Latvian person" comes in
masculine and feminine versions, and thus it was possible to note upon no
more
than seeing their nationality stated that six of the Latvians were male and
one
female. But as all the other nationality names also come in two versions,
then
it would also have been possible to note the presence of a female in them as
well, which however I failed to do. Thus, in the sample of 160 for which
nationalities were specified, there appears to be only a single female. The
Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine, then, appears to have been a male-dominated
occupation.

Possible under-estimate of Jewish participation. The "Polish/German" above
refers to a single official who was inconsistent in identifying his
nationality
on various documents, sometimes stating Polish and sometimes German. Two
possibilities come to mind: first, that neither of these is his true
nationality; second, that other officials may have misrepresented their
nationality more consistently and thus avoided detection. More
specifically, as
Jews commonly assumed non-Jewish names and concealed their Jewish identity,
it
is possible that the above statistics constitute an under-estimate of Jewish
presence in the Cheka-GPU-NKVD.

The Shapoval volume offers some evidence in confirmation of this hypothesis.
That is, in listing the names of the 183 Cheka-GPU-NKVD officials, when the
official used more than one name or changed his name, Shapoval included the
aliases in parentheses. The number of names containing parentheses was 20.
Of
these, 14 were Jewish, 3 Latvian, 1 Russian, 1 German, and 1 unknown. Thus,
it
would appear that the changing of names was overwhelmingly a Jewish
phenomenon.
Furthermore, my impression is that the name changes tended to be in the
direction of making the names less Jewish and more Slavic, though as this
conclusion requires the exercise of judgment, and as in several cases I did
not
trust my judgment, I do not here quantify the direction of the name changes.
Four examples of names that seemed to go from Jewish to Slavic were:

EARLIER JEWISH NAME LATER SLAVIC NAME
Holovanivskyi Bernard Volfovych Kozelskyi Borys Volodymyrovych
Podolsky Davyd Vulfovych Orlov Danylo Volodymyrovych
Izrail Moiseiovych Radzivilovskyi Oleksandr Pavlovych
Rosenbardt Abram Borysovych Rozanov Oleksandr Borysovych

Declining to guess nationality from name? Among the 23 for whom
nationality
was not specified, I noticed a few cases in which nationality might be
inferred
from the name alone. For example, although no nationality was specified for
Solomon Isaakovych Goldman, one might venture to guess that he is more
likely
Jewish than Russian or Ukrainian. I conclude that either the authors had
independent evidence concerning Goldman's nationality but failed to specify
it
as an oversight, or else that they had insufficient biographical data to
infer
nationality, and followed the general rule of declining to do so from name
only.
Of course if the Shapoval authors declined to guess that Solomon Isaakovych
Goldman was Jewish, then I decline to do so as well, leaving him
uncategorized
with respect to nationality.

[...]

A minor paradox resolved. It should go without saying that even if the
Communist Revolution was controlled mostly by Jews, it does not follow that
most
Jews were either Communists or revolutionaries. Rather, many writers go out
of
their way to comment that only a minority of Jews supported Bolshevism, most
were indifferent, and some opposed it. Thus, although in the first of the
pair
of quotations below, we see Hilaire Belloc unequivocally placing
responsibility
for the Russian Revolution at the feet of the Jews, yet in the second of the
pair of quotations we find him unequivocally exonerating Jews in general
from
blame - a seeming paradox which a little thought demonstrates contains no
contradiction:

It was the pure despotism of a clique, the leaders of which had been
specially
launched upon Russia under German direction in order to break down any
chance of
a revival of Russian military power, and all those leaders, without
exception,
were Jews, or held by the Jews through their domestic relations, and all
that
followed was done directly under the orders of Jews, the most prominent of
whom
was one Braunstein, who disguised himself under the assumed name of Trotsky.
A
terror was set up, under which were massacred innumerable Russians of the
governing classes, so that the whole framework of the Russian State
disappeared.
Among these, of course, must specially be noted great numbers of the clergy,
against whom the Jewish revolutionaries had a particular grudge. A clean
sweep
was made of all the old social organization, and under the despotism of this
Jewish clique the old economic order was reversed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1937, p. 58)

For the Bolshevist movement, or rather explosion, was Jewish.

That truth may be so easily confused with a falsehood that I must, at the
outset, make it exact and clear.

The Bolshevist Movement was a Jewish movement, but not a movement of the
Jewish
race as a whole. Most Jews were quite extraneous to it; very many indeed,
and
those of the most typical, abhor it; many actively combat it. The
imputation of
its evils to the Jews as a whole is a grave injustice and proceeds from a
confusion of thought whereof I, at any rate, am free.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1937, p. 55)

Jews present obstacle to the rule of law in Ukraine. One of Ukraine's most
pressing needs today is to demonstrate the rule of law by punishing the most
egregious violations of the law - namely torture, murder, genocide. To the
degree that the number of the guilty and the weakness of the law make this
unfeasible, Ukraine then needs more than anything else to at least implement
a
Truth and Reconciliation Commission paralleling the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission so wisely instituted in South Africa. However, there is one huge
obstacle standing in the way either of the punishment of the guilty or of
inducing them to confess. That obstacle is that a disproportionate number
of
the accused, or of those revealed to have committed crimes, might turn out
to be
Jews, with the result that Ukraine would be portrayed by a mindless world
press
as having gone on an anti-Semitic rampage. Thus, one way that Jews continue
to
harm Ukraine today is by standing in the way of Ukraine demonstrating the
power
of its law to bring its torturers and its butchers to account, or the power
of
its righteousness to command its torturers and its butchers to at least
confess....

.... The Shapoval volume provides us with one such reason why some Ukrainian
anti-Semitism might exist. The reason is that Ukrainians have been aware of
the
Jewish domination of the experiment in government through mass murder which
went
under the name of "Communism," and in which experiment Ukrainians more than
any
other peoples have been conscripted into playing the role of guinea pigs.

Terms of a truce. Were I authorized to represent the Ukrainian position in
negotiating with Jews a cessation of verbal hostilities, I might open with
"If
you stop fabricating lies about us, we will stop disclosing the truth about
you."



Stalin's Jews
We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were
Jewish

Published: 12.21.06

Here's a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between
the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution
and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The
All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and
Sabotage, also known as Cheka.

Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state
security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few
years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to
KGB.

We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for
in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million,
including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges,
expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic
minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals,
artists, labor movement activists, "opposition members" who were defined
completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

In his new, highly praised book "The War of the World, "Historian Niall
Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its
children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution.
In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University's Dr. Igal Halfin
writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed
internally.

Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds
without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined "terror officials," cruel
interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many
bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were
deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher
certificate.

All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the
former Soviet Union's archives have not yet been fully opened to the public.
But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been
brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD's and KGB's service. The
Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of "How could
it have happened to us?" As opposed to Eastern European nations, the
Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever
hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th
Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the
NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is
responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish
deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer
viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as
chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."

Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his
Book "Stalin: Court of the Red Star", Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore
writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing
machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young
Jewish women.

Stalin's close associates and loyalists included member of the Central
Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as
the "first Stalinist" and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an
unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi
horrors and Mao's terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have
blood on their hands for eternity. We'll mention just one more: Leonid
Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief
interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding
the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish
origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges.
In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr.
Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a "carnival of mass murder,"
"fantasy of purges", and "essianism of evil." Turns out that Jews too, when
they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers,
among the greatest known by modern history.

The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet
Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as
Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and "Soviet people." Therefore,
we find it easy to ignore their origin and "play dumb": What do we have to
do with them? But let's not forget them. My own view is different. I find it
unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people
when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he
does amazingly despicable things.

Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of "our hangmen," who
served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment.
After all, others will always remind us of their origin.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/BoD/origins/in_Bolshevism.html


1920: Bertrand Russell Is Repelled By Jewish Bolshevism
History; Posted on: 2004-02-02 23:48:28 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]

In Stockholm, Sweden following a 1920 visit to the "workers' paradise" (his
hoped-for "promised land"), Welsh philosopher and mathematician Bertrand
Russell (1872-1970) wrote to Ottoline Morell: "I loathed the Bolsheviks, the
time in Russia was infinitely painful to me, in spite of being one of the
most interesting things I have ever done. Bolshevism is a close tyrannical
bureaucracy, with a spy system more elaborate and terrible than the Tsar's,
and an aristocracy as insolent and unfeeling, composed of Americanised Jews.
No vestige of liberty remains, in thought or speech or action. I was stifled
and oppressed by the weight of the machine as by a cope of lead. . . .
Imagine yourself governed in every detail by a mixture of Sidney Webb
[prominent English Fabian socialist and Communist fellow traveler] and Rufus
Isaacs ["Marquis of Reading," Jewish Lord Chief Justice of England, later
viceroy and governor general of India] and you will have a picture of modern
Russia."

Russell's letter is reproduced on the "UFO and patriot" website of
radio/Internet talk show host Jeff Rense, who is reportedly Jewish. The
citations given are to the paperback The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell
(London: George Allen & Unwin, 1975), pp. 354-5 and the hardback, 3-volume
The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell: 1914-1944 (Boston: Little, Brown,
1968 ), Vol. 2, p. 172.

Today the insolent and unfeeling Jewish aristocracy, with its close
tyrannical bureaucracy and elaborate and terrible spy system, is stifling
liberty of thought and speech and action throughout the entire First World.
And the weight of its oppression is, indeed, as heavy as lead.


HEAD OF AIPAC BOASTED ABOUT
HIS CONTROL OF POLITICIANS IN 1992
Newspaper clip sent in by a reader:



In 1992, Harry Katz phoned the President of AIPAC, David Steiner, to offer
contributions. Steiner proceeded to make several claims, including
negotiating with then-candidate Bill Clinton over who would be Secretary of
State, and had already "cut a deal" with Baker for more aid to Israel.
Unknown to Steiner, Katz taped the phone call and gave the recording to the
media, worried that AIPAC's influence had grown to dangerous levels.
Following the release of transcripts of the phone conversation, David
Steiner was forced to resign the Presidency of AIPAC.
The following is a transcript of the Oct. 22, 1992 conversation with
President David Steiner of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC) recorded without his knowledge by New York businessman Haim (Harry)
Katz. Its existence was first revealed to the Washington Times and its
release triggered Steiner's resignation.
Scans of the original article


________________________________________

David Steiner AIPAC: Haim.
Haim Katz: Hello, how are you?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Where are you located?
HAIM KATZ: I'm located in Queens, New York.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Queens.. .Far Rockaway?
HAIM KATZ: Belle Harbor.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Belle Harbor. I'm trying to get this list together.
Would you ever get into the city?
HAIM KATZ: Sure, I do. Sure, you come frequently?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Well I come in from time to time. I have an office
there, at AIPAC in the city. You know, I want you to understand . . . where
did you get my name and phone number?
HAIM KATZ: Oh, I, um, I called AIPAC. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah.
HAIM KATZ: And ahh. . .I know you're the president of AIPAC...
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You should understand that, the political information
that I gave you, those are personal choices . . .
HAIM KATZ: Sure, I understand.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: AIPAC does not rate or endorse candidates, does not
solicit money. . .
HAIM KATZ: Yeah, look.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I want you to understand that the choices I would give
you are personal choices.
HAIM KATZ: I understand.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I wonder if before . . . I want to get together with
you next week.
HAIM KATZ: Next week would be fine.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: But in the meantime, I wonder if I can have one of my
people get together with you and talk to you about it . . . They'll want to
meet you and know who you are and all this. I have a.. . maybe if I can have
Seth Buchwald call you, my New York director.
HAIM KATZ: That would be terrific.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: And we have a guy out there, Joel Schnur. And, are you
orthodox?
HAIM KATZ: Ah, yes.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Okay, Joel is orthodox too. I am not.
HAIM KATZ: You're reform or?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I'm reform.
HAIM KATZ: Okay, let me just say. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I was raised orthodox but I'm reform.
HAIM KATZ: Okay, let me just tell you that, I'll just hold you a minute.
I'll be happy to meet with them, I know, I've heard the names, I'd be happy
to meet with them, as a matter of fact I could, when I'm in Manhattan...Are
you ever in Manhattan?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Sure, today I'm going to be there, but I can't. I'm
meeting with the ambassador.
HAIM KATZ: Okay, I'll just ask you very very quickly. You know, like, in New
York, you know, this is your own personal opinion, like in New York we have
Abrams against D'Amato.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Well, let me tell you what my personal position is.
Okay?
HAIM KATZ: Yeah.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: From a Jewish point of view, I believe in political
loyalty.
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: And if someone has been good for Israel, no matter who,
if my brother would run against them, I would support them because they'd
been good to Israel because that's an important message to people.
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: What I'm going to be doing for you. . .
HAIM KATZ: Now D'Amato, has he been good for Israel?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You couldn't have a better . . . listen I think Abrams
would be good too, but that's not the message.
HAIM KATZ: Yeah.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Ah...
HAIM KATZ: So the message, so the message is that ah...I agree with you all
the way, that if somebody's been good for Israel, I'll take D'Amato. But you
have no complaints with D'Amato?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I have no complaints with D'Amato.
HAIM KATZ: Uh huh, so and ah, you know, let me tell you, Abrams might be,
might be too liberal. I don't know if Abrams supported, let's say the ah,
the war against Iraq.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah, I don't know, and ah, I don't know. But all I
know is if I have a guy who is there and he's doing it, then I don't want to
change, you know?
HAIM KATZ: Right. Let me ask you this very quickly and then I will. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I'm going to have Seth call you because in the meantime
I'm going to be preparing this list, what I'm doing is, I've asked my
frienDavid Steiner AIPAC in the various campaigns, I've made about 30 calls,
what I'm trying to put together who neeDavid Steiner AIPAC it the most, you
know? Because you could dissipate a million dollars, but the point is to put
it where it's going to do the most, I know Bob Kasten, who's been an
outstanding friend and neeDavid Steiner AIPAC it I know. . .
HAIM KATZ: Excuse my ignorance. Bob Kasten is what state?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: From Wisconsin. . .
HAIM KATZ: Okay, is he Jewish?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: . . .He's for loan guarantees, he happens to be a
Republican.
HAIM KATZ: Okay, and but, he's good? He's. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You couldn't have better.
HAIM KATZ: Is Kasten, Kasten's been very, very good and he's in trouble?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: He's in big trouble. Les Aspin, who's the Chairman of
the Military Appropriations, a Democrat also from Wisconsin is really
[unintelligible].
HAIM KATZ: You mean, Les Aspin is in trouble?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: In big trouble.
HAIM KATZ: I can't believe it. I mean, I don't, I don't follow . . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Well see, what happened was, you know ah, when you get
to know me, I'll put you on my list and I'll be sending all these things. A
wealthy businessman decided to run, using all his own money. Aspin, 'cause
they sit on the finance committee for Aspin. . .
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: . ..programmed the last two weeks of, well the last
month of the campaign, for TV. This guy came in two months early and we
didn't have the money budgeted, so we're out scratching around to raise
money for him. So we, heck, I told him, I said that I'd go, I'll sign on the
bank on a loan for you, you know, that's how important it is.
HAIM KATZ: Unbelievable. You know I read, I won't hold you long, but I'd
just tell you this. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: That's okay.
HAIM KATZ: . . .I'll just tell you this, I read the New York Post, and I
don't even read the papers too much, I don't follow politics . . . are you
ready for this?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah.
HAIM KATZ: Get ready for this. I read in the papers this morning, I think it
was the (NY) Post, Barbara Boxer, in California. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah.
HAIM KATZ: . ..do you know who she is?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I know who...
HAIM KATZ: She's originally from, ah. . . New York I think. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: A friend of yours?
HAIM KATZ: No, no, no. She's not a friend of mine, but she, ah, I think
she's in trouble.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yean, that's ah, in that race we're okay either way,
'cause Bruce Herschensohn, who she's running against, is Jewish, and he's
very strong on our issues.
HAIM KATZ: Okay, but Herschensohn.. .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Herschensohn's a very conservative Republican.
HAIM KATZ: You know, he's come out of nowhere. He was like 30 points
behind.. .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Right.
HAIM KATZ: He's come out of nowhere with it.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Because the truth of the matter is, she didn't always
vote for foreign aid. We had a big meeting, I had a program in L.A. I had
all four senatorial candidates there, and he ripped her apart. She has
always voted against foreign and.
HAIM KATZ: What about the one, in ah, the one in. . . um, what's his name? I
read it in the paper, it's just a shocker, politics is a crazy game. The
black woman in Chicago. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Carol Moseley Braun?
HAIM KATZ: She was going to win by 50 points. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Oh it's down, she took the money, it's a big problem.
HAIM KATZ: It's a big problem with her. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: And we have a problem with another good friend. You
know Daniel Inouye, from Hawaii he's one of our best frienDavid Steiner
AIPAC. It was Kasten-Inouye on the loan guarantees, Kasten-Inouye and
Leahy.. .
HAIM KATZ: I heard, I saw it on, I know Inouye's in trouble because of, he
sexually harassed his hairdresser. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We commissioned a poll and got some people, and I've
got to raise $27,000 to pay for the poll . . . so I have, so what I'm trying
to do is make a priority list, because I don't know how far you want to go.
. . how old are your kiDavid Steiner AIPAC by the way? . . . You had three
children that could write checks, do they have their own checking accounts?
HAIM KATZ: Yes.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Oh, so that's not going to be. . .
HAIM KATZ: How old do they have to be?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: They can't be one year old.
HAIM KATZ: I mean, could they be 18, 17?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Sure, no problem, so they could make, nobody's going to
bother you, but if you had infants, a four-year-old, let's say, it's not a
contest.
HAIM KATZ: Let me tell you, I was planning, I was planning to, to . . .
Inouye, by the way, is in real trouble? He's been there forever. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah! Well, we might lose him. There's been such a sea
change, such trouble this year, I can't believe all our frienDavid Steiner
AIPAC that are in trouble. Because there's an anti-incumbency mood, and
foreign aid has not been popular. You know what I got for, I met with [U.S.
Secretary of State] Jim Baker and I cut a deal with him. I got, besides the
$3 billion, you know they're looking for the Jewish votes, and I'll tell him
whatever he wants to hear. . .
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Besides the $10 billion in loan guarantees which was a
fabulous thing, $3 billion in foreign, in military aid, and I got almost a
billion dollars in other goodies that people don't even know about.
HAIM KATZ: Such as?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: $700 million in military draw-down, from equipment that
the United States Army's going to give to Israel; $200 million the U.S.
government is going to preposition materials in Israel, which Israel can
draw upon; put them in the global warning protection system; so when if
there's a missile fired, they'll get the same advanced notification that the
U.S., is notified, joint military exercises-I've got a whole shopping list
of things.
HAIM KATZ: So this is from Baker?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: From Baker and from the Pentagon.
HAIM KATZ: So, not so, not.. .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Why did he do it, you know, why did he do it? Last year
I was a bum. This year I said look Jim, we're going to fight on the F-l5s.
Israel doesn't want to fight, I said, but some people on it are going to
come up on the floor of the Senate and the House and they're going to fight.
If you'll do this, I think I can hold them back. But you've got to do it
right away. They didn't want to fight. I said, "You don't want a fight
before the election. It's going to hurt Bush. We don't want a fight before
the election. We don't want to fight at all. Why can't we work something
out?" So we cut a deal. You can't repeat this.
HAIM KATZ: You're right. But you met with Baker. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Personally.
HAIM KATZ: Personally. Because you know, he's the one who cursed, who cursed
the Jews.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Of course, do you think I'm ever going to forgive him
for that?
HAIM KATZ: Unbelievable. I said...
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Do you think I could ever forgive Bush for what he did
September 12th a year ago? What he said about the Jews for lobbying in
Washington?
HAIM KATZ: Do you think that Baker has a legitimate concern for the Jews?
From what I hear, do you think he's anti-Semitic?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I wouldn't go so far as to say that. He's a pragmatic
businessman, he's a very tough lawyer. He does whatever it takes.
HAIM KATZ: And that's why.. .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: If we didn't have an election this year, you would get
[unintelligible] from him.
HAIM KATZ: Let me ask you a quick question. Just a quick question here. You
know Perot, you know, I'm telling you this is scary. I don't know what you
think of Perot, but if Perot hadn't backed out, I watched the debates. I
thought Perot did marvelous in the debates.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: He doesn't know how to govern. He's not going to make
it. And there was an incident where his daughter was going out with a Jewish
professor at school and he said, "I wouldn't have my daughter marry a Jew."
HAIM KATZ: So Perot, they say that if Perot hadn't backed out in July, and
if he would have gotten himself a good running mate, you know . . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: He wouldn't win, but it would go to the House of
Representatives. The Democrats would win in the House of Representatives.
HAIM KATZ: So if it goes to the House, the Democrats would win for sure.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: For sure.
HAIM KATZ: Okay let me ask you, last question and then I'll be happy to meet
with your New York people. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You know, you sound like my kind of guy. How old are
you?
HAIM KATZ: Forty-two.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You're a kid.
HAIM KATZ: I'm not a kid, I'm 42. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I'm 63, you're a kid.
HAIM KATZ: I wish I was...
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We'll have to get you involved. I like you, we have a
lot to talk about, about real estate, you know, I have so many great
activities going on at AIPAC, you ought to think about coming to some of
these things. I'll have a dinner this fall. I'll have 18-20 senators there.
I run programs in Washington. We just had a, I had at Ted Kennedy's house
last month kosher dinner. I brought foremost caterers down. I had 60 people
on the couch for dinner. Last year, I did it in Al Gore's house.
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Those are the things you should be getting involved in
and knowing what's going on. . .
HAIM KATZ: Let me just ask you about Clinton. I want to tell you, you may
not believe this, but I think that if Perot. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah, he would've given us a hard time. What's the name
of your company, what do you do business as?
HAIM KATZ: We do business as HAIM KATZ, Inc.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: HAIM KATZ, Inc.?
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Do you have a street address?
HAIM KATZ: Sure. 621 Beach 129th Street, Belle Harbor, Queens, New York,
11694.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah, because on my computer you only show a post
office box. This is your house? You work out of your house?
HAIM KATZ: Yeah, out of an office in the house. . . Look, Mr. Steiner...
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: David. My father's Mr. Steiner.
HAIM KATZ: David, let me just ask you about Clinton. Honestly, what do you
feel about Clinton?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Well, I've known Bill Clinton for seven eight years. I
think he's got to be a lot better than George Bush. . . we have a lot of
people in there. But he doesn't need money, he really doesn't need money.
I'm a trustee of the Democratic National Committee. We collected $63 million
for him so far.
HAIM KATZ: Who's collected $63 million?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton
campaign have raised $63 million.
HAIM KATZ: So they've already raised $63 million, so they don't need money.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: No, we need money, like we got a guy, Byron Dorgan, in
North Dakota, who's going to be very good for us and we need money to make
sure that he gets in. We've got people like that, because [unintelligible],
whatever you give them would be a tickle on the elephant's behind. But when
you give $5,000 or $10,000 to Bob Kasten, that's very meaningful.
HAIM KATZ: Let me ask you, I understand what you're saying. Clinton, when
Clinton first started running a year ago, did he need money at that time?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yes he did.
HAIM KATZ: I mean, did you help him out, 'cause that's the time. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I personally am not allowed, as president of AIPAC, to
get involved in the presidential campaign, because I have to deal with
whoever wins. You know, I've got to go see Bush if he's there, but I helped
him, we raised over a million dollars for him in New Jersey.
HAIM KATZ: For Clinton?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: For Clinton.
HAIM KATZ: And this was when, in the beginning?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: In the beginning, yes. After he won, before the
convention.
HAIM KATZ: This is before the convention?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Oh sure.
HAIM KATZ: Okay, let me ask you, you know, T
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We've also raised for other guys who are running too,
because they're frienDavid Steiner AIPAC. Harkin, the senator, you know you
have to be with everybody.
HAIM KATZ: Let me ask you, [talks about getting cheated in business by
Gentiles]. Let me ask you, Clinton, if he becomes, I mean what will he do
for Israel, better than Bush, if he becomes, I know Bush gave you a hard
time, this and that. ..
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I'II tell you, I have frienDavid Steiner AIPAC on the
Clinton campaign, close associates. Gore is very committed to us.
HAIM KATZ: Right. Clinton if he, have you spoken to him?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I've known Bill for seven, eight years from the
National Governors Association. I know him on a personal basis. I have
frienDavid Steiner AIPAC. One of my frienDavid Steiner AIPAC is Hillary
Clinton's scheduler, one of my officer's daughters works there. We gave two
employees from AIPAC leave of absences to work on the campaign. I mean, we
have a dozen people in that campaign, in the headquarters.
HAIM KATZ: You mean in Little Rock?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: In Little Rock, and they're all going to get big jobs.
We have frienDavid Steiner AIPAC. I also work with a think tank, the
Washington Institute. I have Michael Mandelbaum and Martin Indyk being
foreign policy advisers. Steve Speigel-we've got frienDavid Steiner
AIPAC-this is my business.
HAIM KATZ: I understand, David.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: It's very complicated and the more you get into it,
you'll love it. You sound like a smart guy.
HAIM KATZ: I'm a smart guy, but I have a, maybe because I'm more orthodox
than you are, I've had bad experiences with Gentiles. Let me ask you, you
know what "tachlis" means?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah, sure.
HAIM KATZ: From a practical point of view, if Clinton wins the presidency,
and I'm sure he will, I hope so at least, what will be the benefits to
Israel better than Bush? From a very practical point . . . I mean, you just
told me that Bush gave you everything you wanted. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Only, not everything, at the end, when we didn't want
the F-l5s, that's a terrible thing.
HAIM KATZ: Selling the F-l5s? If Clinton is elected. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Let me tell you the problem with the $10 billion in
loan guarantees, right? We only have the first year. We have authorization
from Congress, but it's at the discretion of the president every year
thereafter, so if Bush is there, he could say, you know, use it as a club,
you know. 'If you don't give up Syria, I won't give you the money. If you
don't give up the Golan Heights.' It's at the discretion of the president.
And that's why we need a friendly president and we have Bill Clinton's ear.
I talked to Bill Clinton.
HAIM KATZ: And Bill Clinton has made a commitment that if he's elected . . .
?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: He's going to be very good for us.
HAIM KATZ: And he'll go ahead with the loan guarantees?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We didn't talk about that specifically, listen, I
didn't ask him that, but I have full confidence that we're going to have a
much better situation. He's got Jewish frienDavid Steiner AIPAC. A girl who
worked for me at AIPAC stood up for them at their wedding. Hillary lived
with her. I mean we have those relationships. We have never had that with
Bush. Susan Thomases, who's in there, worked with me on the Bradley
campaign. We worked together for 13 years. She's In there with the family.
They stay with her when they come to New York. One of my officers, Monte
Friedkin, is one of the biggest fund-raisers for them. I mean, I have people
like that all over the country.
HAIM KATZ: So, I mean from a practical point of view. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: He's going to be with us.
HAIM KATZ: I don't say, this business, you say, Bush only went ahead with
the loan guarantees for one year.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We only have. It's mandatory they give us the $2
billion for one year. After that it's subject to the discretion of the
president.
HAIM KATZ: You mean the other $8 billion?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: That's correct. On an annualized basis.
HAIM KATZ: Also, I heard that. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: They don't have to give it to us.
HAIM KATZ: But if Clinton is elected. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC:... feel reasonably certain we're gonna get It.
HAIM KATZ: He's made that commitment?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Well, he said he's going to help us. He's got something
in his heart for the Jews, he has Jewish frienDavid Steiner AIPAC. Bush has
no Jewish frienDavid Steiner AIPAC.
HAIM KATZ: Right.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Reagan had something . . . meshuga, but at least he had
a commitment. He knew Jews from the film industry, he was one of the best
guys for us. He had an emotional thing for the Jews. Bush doesn't have it.
That's what it is really, if you have a feeling for our people, for what we
believe in. Bush is, there's a man with no principles. Absolutely no
principles.
HAIM KATZ: I heard something about, but I never really understood it, with
the scoring. One of my frienDavid Steiner AIPAC told me there's a difference
in the scoring, but I don't understand. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Scoring is like points that you pay.
HAIM KATZ: So let's say, if Bush is elected on the loans . . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: No, we've got the scoring arranged, it's four and a
half percent. It's all done.
HAIM KATZ: That's all done, even with Bush?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Even with Bush. I've got that worked out.
HAIM KATZ: So that's all done.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: It's in the bill. It's all passed. He signed the bill.
It's a matter of law.
HAIM KATZ: So it's already four and a half percent?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We could've had it less, but then we couldn't. . .
HAIM KATZ: And Clinton, if he was president, he would give...?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: He could not change it, you cannot change it.
HAIM KATZ: No, but I'm saying, if he was president now, before the bill was
signed, he would've given you the four and a half percent. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I would've gotten less.
HAIM KATZ: I'm sorry?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I would've gotten it cheaper.
HAIM KATZ: How much? Even two percent?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah, we thought we were going to get two percent. But
Rabin gave it away.
HAIM KATZ: You mean Rabin didn't bargain as good as he could have?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: That's right.
HAIM KATZ: Unbelievable. So, if Clinton is elected, that will be the best.
..
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I think that will be the best we could do.
HAIM KATZ: You know, I just want to tell you one last thing. Do you have
parents that come from Europe?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Yeah, of course, from Glolitzano, near Krakow. ,
HAIM KATZ: You're kidding, your parents are from Krakow?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Near Krakow.
HAIM KATZ: Guess what?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You too?
HAIM KATZ: My parents are from Krakow.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Well, we're not from Krakow, but from near Krakow. My
mother's from Rudnick, my father from Gruns, near Tano. Do you know where
Tano is?
HAIM KATZ: Yes. Let me tell you. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC .. don't have many left. Everybody got
HAIM KATZ: Let me tell you. The same with me. Let me tell you, my parents
were the only ones who came out. Let me tell you, my. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: You're a Holocaust survivor?
HAIM KATZ: Yeah, no, not me, my parents.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: That's some experience, I've got two cousins, I've got
one in Israel and one in France that came out of Mauthausen, I'll tell you,
and everybody else dead on my father's side, in Russia. I just brought six
of them from KosHaim Katzent to Israel last year.
HAIM KATZ: Right. Let me tell you that, you know what my father always says?
My father was a rich man in Poland, and he says, he says, "Economic power is
very good. You have to have money, but if you just have economic power and
you don't have political power. . ."
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: "You've got nothing."
HAIM KATZ: You've got nothing.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: If we had AIPAC in the '30s and '40s, we would have
saved millions of Jews. We would have the political power. But Jews were
afraid to open their mouths. They didn't know how. HAIM KATZ: AIPAC started
after WWII?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Oh, sure.
HAIM KATZ And if you would have had AIPAC in the
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I feel we would've saved a lot of Jews. HAIM KATZ: And
Franklin Roosevelt, he could've done a lot better?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Sure, he could. The Jews never opened their mouths.
They were afraid. We're not afraid. They can curse me out, I don't care if
they hate me, just as long as I get what we need for our people.
HAIM KATZ: So if you had a little lamp, a wishing lamp and you could wish
for either Bush, Clinton or Perot. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Clinton.
HAIM KATZ: Clinton all the way? And in terms of Israel having political
power, between the three candidates, the one who will give us the most
political power?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Clinton is the best guy for us.
HAIM KATZ: He's the best one.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I hope you're serious about what you told me.
HAIM KATZ: I am, I'll tell you this [tells a long anecdote about David
Souter promising to oppose abortion as a nominee and then reversing himself
on the Supreme Court]. So I wish we had a Jewish candidate for president.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I don't think the country's ready.
HAIM KATZ: If the country was ready, is there any Jewish candidate...?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC:I wouldn't venture to say anything.
HAIM KATZ: You know who? I don't know him, I've never met him, Joe
Lieberman.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Oh, I'm very friendly with Joe. I'm having dinner with
him Monday night.
HAIM KATZ: Let me tell you, I think Joe Lieberman would have, uh, would
have, if he wasn't Jewish, that's the only problem he has. He's highly
respected.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I'd like to see him on the Supreme Court.
HAIM KATZ: If Clinton is elected, has he told you who he's going to put on
the Supreme Court?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We're talking now. We don't have no commitments yet.
We're just negotiating. We're more interested right now, in the secretary of
state and the secretary of National Security Agency. That's more important
to us.
HAIM KATZ: If Clinton is elected, who do you think will be secretary of
state?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We don't know yet, we're negotiating.
HAIM KATZ: Who are you hoping for?
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I've got a list. But I really can't go through it. I'm
not allowed to talk about it.
HAIM KATZ: But you figure, God willing, if Clinton's elected . . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: We'll have access.
HAIM KATZ: You'll have access and you'll have a good input into who's
secretary of state.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: I do believe so.
HAIM KATZ: And the other position is. . .
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: National security adviser.
HAIM KATZ: Those are the two critical positions.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Right.
HAIM KATZ: Gotcha. Well, David, thanks for talking with me.
W: And we're going to get together next week. I hope you'll have your
checkbook ready.
HAIM KATZ: Will do.
DAVID STEINER AIPAC: Okay, thanks.
HAIM KATZ: And let me ask you about the real estate. . . [more talk about
irrelevant issues].


IS ISRAEL BLACKMAILING AMERICA?

FOX NEWS SPIKES FOUR PART STORY
ON PHONE TAPPING SCANDAL

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/blackmail.html

What follows is the original article I wrote when the news story first broke
regarding the existence of a system to tap into any phone in America built
into the surveillance system used by law enforcement authorities. Several
cases were cited where investigations ranging from drug running and money
laundering to the events of 9/11 had been compromised by leaks from the
company that operated the phone taps as well as phone data from an
associated company that handles billing services for almost every phone in
America.

The focus of the article was a single question. Could Israel be blackmailing
the entire US Government and media.

The answer is now obvious. Fox News, the so-called "We report, you decide"
all news network, has removed the four part story from their website. No
explanation is given except for the single Orwellian sentence at the end of
one of the links, "This story no longer exists".

Israel, purportedly our friend, has been spying on us all. And we're not
talking about individual spooks like Jonathan Pollard, or small-time
networks such as the 140 Israelis arrested by the FBI prior to 9/11, or the
60 arrested since (including 5 arrested who were cheering and celebrating as
the World Trade Towers collapsed).

It turns out that Israel has had a potential wiretap on every phone in
America for years, along with the ability to monitor and record who any
person is calling, anywhere in America; information of great value even if
one does not listen to the calls themselves. Amdocs, Inc. the company which
sub contracts billing and directory services for phone companies around the
world, including 90 percent of American phone companies, is owned by Israeli
interests. Yet another company, Comverse Infosys, is suspected of having
built a "back door" into the equipment permanently installed into the phone
system that allows instant eavesdropping by law enforcement agencies on any
phone in America. This includes yours.

Concerns about allowing an Israeli company such intimate access to the
infrastructure go back many years. As reported by Fox News, the Israeli
company Amdocs was implicated in the leaking of police phone data that
resulted in the collapse of on investigation into a massive drug and credit
card fraud operation with Israeli connections.

In a telling repeat of the Los Angeles drug case, investigators looking into
the attacks on the World Trade Towers are again reporting that confidential
telephone information is again being leaked in a manner that is interfering
with the investigations. Again, Amdocs was implicated.

Not content with the phones of ordinary citizens in the United States,
evidence has surfaced that Israel compromised the telephone systems at the
highest levels of the US Government.

Now, I want you all to stop and think for a minute of the full ramifications
of this. Israeli interests have the ability to listen in on ANY phone in
America connected to any of the systems used by Amdocs or Comverse Infosys.
They have had this ability for several years. They can listen in and track
the phone calls made by anyone's phone, whether police officer, elected
official, media talking head, editor, policy setter, news mogul, even the
President of the United States. The Ken Starr report on Whitewater describes
how Bill Clinton warned Monica Lewinsky that a foreign government was
tapping their phone calls.

Few indeed are the people in America who do not have something to hide. That
insider trade, the brief but torrid affair, the stolen votes, the deliberate
smear, the role one played in an assassination, the acceptance of money from
drug runners to look the other way. Be honest. Is there a skeleton in your
closet you hope will stay there? Something nobody knows about? Well, if that
skeleton involved a phone call, someone may know about it. Amdocs and
Comverse Infosys. And their Israeli owners.

Just think about it for a moment. Everyone's private phone traffic, right up
to the President, potentially visible to Israeli interests. And you cannot
find the phone taps or bugs because they are built right into the phone
system!

Suddenly, a lot of events which have puzzled observers start to make sense.

Like the way the US vetoed the UN resolution calling for peace in Palestine,
despite being the only 1 out of 15 voting nations to have voted against the
measure. The USA gained nothing by this veto. But Israel did.

Over the last few weeks, the people of the United States have seen a great
deal of evidence pointing the finger of blame for 9/11 at Osama bin Laden
and Arabs in general, evidence which is circumstantial, often
self-contradictory, and in some cases faked. Yet as was reported in the
news, evidence also exists linking many of the arrested Israeli spies (some
of whom worked for the Israeli telecom companies above) with the events of
9/11. Yet this evidence is NOT being broadcast endlessly on the news. In
fact, this evidence is CLASSIFIED. Someone has "persuaded" the US Government
and the media that the American people are ONLY supposed to see the evidence
that points a certain direction, and must never see any evidence that points
someplace else. Likewise, the media has been "persuaded" not to report
evidence that Israel knew of the 9/11 attacks ahead of time. The foreign
press has outright accused the Mossad of taking part in the 9/11 attacks but
the American media have been "persuaded" not to cover these accusations.

It was well known that there was an Israeli spy inside the Clinton White
House. But Clinton ordered the FBI to cease searching for the mole,
code-named "Mega". It is now known that "Mega" was not just Mossad spy but
top Mossad agent in America. The cancellation of the hunt for "Mega"
occurred at the same time Clinton warned Monica Lewinsky that their phone
conversations were being recorded. This strongly suggests that Clinton was
"persuaded" to call off the FBI's hunt for "Mega" with the threat of a
recorded phone sex session being made public.

Because of the purported links between Muslims and the attacks on the World
Trade Towers, the US Government has been shutting down all Muslin linked
charities in the USA. But the Chairman of the Jewish Defense League, a group
with a violent history, was arrested recently in a plot to bomb a US
congressman. But the US Government has been "persuaded" not to take actions
against Jewish charities, while the media has been "persuaded" to allow the
story of hard evidence of JDL terrorism to fade away as quickly as possible.

Two Mossad agents were arrested with dynamite inside the Mexican Congress.

Mexican newspaper front page with story of the arrested Mossad agents.

The Mexican government was persuaded to release the two men without trial.
Meanwhile, the American media has been "persuaded" not to report on the
Mexican arrests.

Israel receives a hugely disproportionate share of foreign aid from the
United States, about $5 billion a year. A large segment of the US population
questions the sending so much money to such a small population while so many
people remain homeless on our own streets. But somehow, Congress is
"persuaded" to keep sending more cash each and every year.

Sharon faces war crimes trial.
The American media is "persuaded" not to make a big deal of the story.
Israel is in violation of the Geneva Accords.
The American media is "persuaded" not to make a big deal of this story.
The United Nations accuses Israel of using torture on children.
The American media is "persuaded" not to make a big deal of this story,
either.

How is such persuasion possible?

Blackmail.

The revelation of an Israeli-linked system for monitoring and potentially
listening in to the phone calls of every single person in the nation at will
opens up the possibility that a massive blackmail operation, unprecedented
in scale, is the real force shaping media bias and United States policy.

The reality is that this nation's politicians and media leaders all have
secrets to hide. Mistresses, drug habits, links to that airfield in Mena,
Arkansas, BCCI cash sitting in that bank in Barbados, loot from ADFA in the
Cayman's; in a corrupted society only the corrupt can reach the heights of
power, and they all have secrets to hide. They are all vulnerable to
blackmail. And being the kind of people who were willing to, and usually
did, anything to get power, they are also the people willing to do anything
to keep it. Look the other way when the drugs come in, spike an embarrassing
news story or plant a fake one that embarrasses your enemy, alter the books,
destroy a report, falsify data, destroy evidence, maybe even allow the
military might of the United States and the blood of her children to be
tricked into fighting someone else's war.

History has shown that if a crime is possible, it is also inevitable. The
cold hard reality is that Amdocs and Comverse Infosys are the most powerful
tools a blackmailer could ever hope for, opening up the private lives of
everyone in the nation, including the secrets of targets able to control the
media and US policy.
Dare we ignore this potential threat?

Or will the media be "persuaded" that all this fuss about Israeli-owned
companies with wires into the phone system is just a lot of nonsense?

There is one more aspect to this issue that needs to be looked at. If indeed
Israel is blackmailing our officials and media icons, it is because those
who are being blackmailed ARE blackmailable. If we elect a government of
criminals, we elect a government subject to blackmail. Finally, given the
fact that blackmail may be assumed to be as widespread as the collection
system itself is, those who persist in trying to defend Israel may no longer
be assumed to be operating from the purest of motives. After all, who will
defend a blackmailer more staunchly than those who are the blackmailer's
victims?


Peace, Propaganda, and the Promised Land: Documentary Examines US Media
Coverage of the Israeli Palestinian Conflict

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/03/1351216

How has the US media covered the conflict in the Middle East? We play an
excerpt of the documentary "Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land: U.S.
Media & the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict." The film was directed by
Bathsheba Ratzkoff and Sut Jhally of the Media Education Foundation.
[includes rush transcript]
________________________________________
We continue our coverage of the situation in the Middle East by examining
how the U.S. press has been reporting on Lebanon, Israel and Gaza. Some have
suggested that America is watching a different war than much of the world.
The British journalist Julian Borger came to that conclusion after watching
the news in Washington and London.

The British press, he said, overwhelmingly emphasized the civilian
casualties in Lebanon. Meanwhile the U.S. media has focused on the situation
in Israeli cities like Haifa. Some journalists from the Middle East are now
refusing to work with American news outlets.

Earlier this week, two producers working for Fox News in Amman Jordan
resigned in protest. In their resignation letter, Serene Sabbagh and Jomana
Karadsheh wrote "We can no longer work with a news organization that claims
to be fair and balanced when you are so far from that. Not only are you an
instrument of the Bush White House, and Israeli propaganda, you are war
mongers with no sense of decency, nor professionalism."

We air an excerpt from the documentary "Peace Propaganda and the Promised
Land: U.S. Media & the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict." The film was directed
by Bathsheba Ratzkoff and Sut Jhally of the Media Education Foundation.

. Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land: U.S. Media & the
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Film directed by Bathsheba Ratzkoff and Sut
Jhally of the Media Education Foundation. More info on the documentary
online at www.pppl.org
________________________________________
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us
provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV
broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

AMY GOODMAN: In a few minutes, we're going to speak with a panel of media
analysts and journalists here in New York, in Beirut and in Tel Aviv. But
first, an excerpt from the documentary, Peace, Propaganda & the Promised
Land: U.S. Media & the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. The film was directed
by Bathsheba Ratzkoff and Sut Jhally of the Media Education Foundation.

NARRATOR: Americans rely on the news media for information about events
occurring around the world. News, especially television news, exerts a
powerful influence on our perceptions, telling us which events are important
and shaping our understanding of the issues. Given the central role played
by the United States in the Middle East conflict and thus the vital role
played by American voters, influencing U.S. media coverage of the conflict
is crucial. Controlling the images and words used to explain the conflict
has become an important extension of the struggle.

PROF. ROBERT JENSEN: Israel is really fighting a war on two fronts. The
first is a military campaign being waged in the Occupied Territories against
the Palestinian people. And the second is a PR campaign being waged here in
the U.S. through the American media to ensure continued support for Israel's
occupation. Alon Pinkas, Consul General for Israel in New York and the
coordinator of Israel's PR efforts, was recently quoted as saying, "We are
currently in a conflict with the Palestinians, and engaging in a successful
PR campaign is part of winning the conflict." So you could say that in
addition to the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, Israel is
also involved in an attempt to ideologically occupy the American media.

NARRATOR: The roots of Israel's public relations campaign go back to the
1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon that earned it worldwide criticism, in
particular the massacre of Palestinian civilians at the refugee camps of
Sabra and Chatila. To the Israeli government, the problem was not the deaths
of thousands of civilians. Rather, it was the damage to Israel's public
image, a public relations disaster in need of damage control.

ROBERT FISK: They surrounded Beirut. In three months, 17,500 people, almost
all of them civilians, were killed. I saw many thousands of their bodies.
Then came the massacre of Sabra and Chatila by Israel's own allies, as the
camp was surrounded by Israeli troops. And they desperately said, "What went
wrong?" It was concluded that the problem was, it wasn't good enough public
relations.

PROF. ROBERT JENSEN: After the public relations disaster of Lebanon, Israel
decided to set up permanent institutional structures to control how
Americans would think about the Middle East. In 1983, Israel launched the
Hasbara Project, the aim of which was to ensure good press in the U.S.
media. The goal was to train Israeli diplomats in communications and public
relations. For example, they trained press officers in Israeli consulates in
the U.S. to ensure that American journalists would write stories favorable
to Israel. As one of these press officers said in the 1980s, he had
breakfast, lunch and dinner with journalists and that a typical day would
involve conversations with producers at leading news and TV talk shows about
the content of the program. He described it as, in fact, quote, a "joint
formulation of ideas." This targeting of the American media goes on in the
present day.

ALISA SOLOMON: The Israeli press office is spitting out press releases,
statements, information all the time. So you could sit in a bureau in
Jerusalem and file stories from there all the time, without really having to
have much imagination or have much energy or have much drive. The Palestine

Authority press office is almost useless, and they certainly aren't
providing you with readymade stories the way the Israeli press office is.

HUSSEIN IBISH: Because of the lack of access to Palestinian officials in the
West Bank and the sophistication of Israel's PR techniques inside Israel, a
lot of times the stories are already tilted in Israel's favor, before they
ever leave American journalists sitting in the area.

ALISA SOLOMON: When you're talking about how the story's covered from the
U.S., the propaganda machine is even more effective than it is in Israel.

NARRATOR: American news coverage is influenced by a complex set of
institutional relationships. These influences can be thought of as a series
of filters through which the news must travel before it emerges in the
voices of news anchors. To understand how American news media report on the
Middle East conflict, we need to understand how these institutional filters
operate.

Among the most important of these filters are the business interests of the
corporations that own the mass media, interests that extend beyond the
United States and across the globe to the Middle East. The economic
interests of media owners are shared by political elites, politicians and
policymakers who form a second filter. These political elites have the power
to access and influence mainstream media and are themselves part of a system
dominated by corporate money and interests. The strategic importance of the
Middle East to these two groups is reflected in media coverage of the region
and of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A third filter, Israel's own public relations efforts, further affects the
coverage. The government of Israel employs some of the largest American
public relations firms as image consultants to coordinate its political and
media campaigns. Nine Israeli consulates helped implement these PR campaigns
by developing relationships with journalists and monitoring media outlets.

Scores of private American organizations, both Christian and Jewish,
reiterate the official line and organize grassroots opposition to any
coverage deemed unfavorable to Israel. The most important of these is AIPAC,
the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, widely regarded as the most
powerful foreign lobby in Washington. This institutional framework of
American business and political interests in combination with Israeli public
relations shapes media coverage of the Middle East.

At the same time, those progressive organizations opposing Israeli
government policy, such as Jews Against the Occupation and Americans for
Peace Now, rarely make it through these filters. Finally, if any news
stories critical of Israeli policy do surface, there are a host of media
watchdog groups that monitor and pressure journalists and media outlets, the
most important of which is CAMERA.

ALISA SOLOMON: You have activist organizations from the right, the
pro-Israeli right, that very effectively, they say monitor, I would say
harass, journalists and their editors and try to make sure that the coverage
is objective, by which they mean pro-Israel.

SETH ACKERMAN: You can see all of the kind of pressure groups who write
campaigns of letters to the editor against news outlets and ask for --
demand that stories be changed or that reporters be fired.

ROBERT FISK: The abuse against the journalists is something you just have to
take into account. Both literally and metaphorically, if you work in the
Middle East, you've got to take the sticks and stones. What I object to is
that my American colleagues don't seem to be prepared to do that.

SETH ACKERMAN: And even in Israel itself, you know, you can find the main
daily newspapers, like Ha'aretz, for example, provides coverage on the
ground and analysis, some of which has views on the conflict that you would
never -- that would be almost beyond the pail for an American journalist at
the New York Times to write.

ROBERT FISK: The main major television news networks and newspapers in the
United States have long ago got their fear to be supreme over their duties
as journalists. They are not monitoring the centers of power when it comes
to the relationship between America and the Middle East, Israel and America,
and America and the Arabs and the Palestinians. They will not ask the right
questions. They will not report it using the correct words. They will not
confront the reality. And they've given up. And I think once you acquire
fear, it's very difficult to get rid of it.

AMY GOODMAN: Robert Fisk, war correspondent of the Independent, in the
documentary, Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land: U.S. Media & the
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, produced by the Media Education Foundation.
You can go to their website at pppl.org.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17525.htm




JIM REED:
It's the Lobby, stupid
CBC News Viewpoint | Aug. 1, 2006 | More from Jim Reed


________________________________________
Jim Reed has worked as a researcher, writer, producer, director, reporter
and news anchor for CTV, TVO and CBC. He has travelled widely and has
freelanced for The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Globe and Mail
and other news organizations.

________________________________________

http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_reed/20060801.html
Many people wonder how it is that Israel has such influence with the U.S.
Congress and why it enjoys such favour with the American government. Ask
anyone in Washington, D.C., that question and you will get a four-word
answer, often in hushed tones and a bit of a quizzical look: "It's the
Lobby, stupid."
"The Lobby" they mean is a group of Americans who represent the interests of
Israel on Capital Hill.

Few members of the U.S. House or Senate want to talk about the subject on
the record, because, on the one hand they respect this lobby group and on
the other, they fear it.

Two well-known American academics, Stephen Walt, former academic dean of the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, and John Mearsheimer from the
University of Chicago, recently published a lengthy essay titled The Israel
Lobby. Professors Walt and Mearsheimer write that American foreign policy
has been "unduly influenced and even distorted by this U.S. domestic
pressure group."

The lobby's driving force is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee,
or AIPAC. Associated with it are many national Jewish organizations across
the United States and some members of the U.S. civil service. While AIPAC
does not raise money to finance candidates, it holds information workshops,
sponsors paid trips to Israel and provides advice and assistance to pro
Israel Political Action Committees (PACs) throughout the U.S.
PACs are a common feature of U.S. politics. They're usually groups of
private individuals organized to raise election campaign funds. They then
use the money to support or oppose electoral candidates.

Powerful political force

In the case of AIPAC, it evaluates the contenders based on how friendly they
are to Israel and how supportive they are of Israeli government policy.
All PACs attempt to influence congressional voting patterns and they promote
or discourage the passage of certain legislation. According to Washington
insiders, the Israel lobby and the PACs they influence, make up the most
powerful political force of its kind in the country. There's nothing illegal
or even morally wrong about this lobby. It's just very good at getting
results. Critics, however, suggest that it has become too powerful.

It's powerful enough in fact, according to those who have experienced its
pressure first-hand, to influence - some say dictate, U.S. foreign policy.
The Walt/Mearsheimer essay is controversial and not many in the mainstream
media have dared touch it for fear of being labelled anti-Semitic.
In his comments on the essay, Tony Judt of New York University agrees that
the lobby does indeed affect U.S. foreign policy and he suggests it has been
very successful. Judt points out, for example, that "Israel is the largest
recipient of American foreign aid" and, he says, "American responses to
Israeli behavior have been overwhelmingly supportive."

Foreign policy and foreign aid have always been the lobby's primary targets.
Even some AIPAC supporters express surprise at just how effective its
lobbying efforts have been.

Special treatment

Israel receives about one-fifth of all the foreign aid that the U.S.
dispenses to needy countries. All countries with one exception receive their
aid in instalments. Israel, however, gets special treatment. Its money is
delivered each year in a lump-sum payment, up front. (Congressional critics
point out that Israel can thus earn interest on free money.)

Moreover, Israel is the only aid recipient that does not have to account in
detail for the ways in which the money is spent. It is even allowed to use
25 per cent of its annual allocation of approximately $3 billion to
subsidize its own defence industry. These unusually generous terms are the
direct result of intense lobbying by AIPAC and its friends.

Of course there are many strong reasons why AIPAC is first among equals. Not
least among those, according to insiders, is Jewish/American history.
While Jews were being interned in concentration camps prior to the Second
World War, the U.S. continued to invest heavily in German (read Nazi)
industry.
The U.S., like Canada, had severe limits on Jewish immigration, even though
these two governments were well aware of the persecution Jews were
suffering. AIPAC has always believed that aid and policy support for Israel
are one way of atoning for that astonishing behaviour by North Americans.

There is also the strong belief that Israel is in the forefront of the War
on Terror and that in a way serves as a Middle Eastern security barrier for
the United States.

These days, few in the U.S. Congress venture to criticize Israeli actions or
policies; when a politician is critical, he or she is reminded -
vigorously - of the American commitment to the survival of the Israeli
state, that it's the only democracy in the region and that more than 50,000
Americans have dual U.S./Israeli citizenship and reside in that country.
Most often, the potentially critical lawmaker stays silent and votes the
party line.
But once in a rare while, someone refuses to go along.

Decorated for bravery

Such was the case of Republican Congressman Paul McCloskey, an ex-U.S.
marine who won purple hearts and other medals for bravery fighting in Korea.
He was a popular member of the House of Representatives elected by landslide
votes in northern California.
By the early 1970s, McCloskey had gained a reputation as a proponent of
human rights, and, as a critic of the war in Vietnam, he was the first
politician to call for Richard Nixon's impeachment. His record was widely
respected.

While his opposition to the Vietnam War was never a liability for him,
another position he took proved to be his downfall. From his own personal
experience, McCloskey had seen that war was an ineffective and inefficient
method of solving international problems.

That meant that one of the items on his agenda was the Middle East.
McCloskey's position was essentially that Palestinian militancy, and use of
terrorist action to get attention, was fed and nurtured by the policies of
the very government that complained about it - Israel.

He called for a halt to Israel's expansion into territory that had been
intended by the United Nations as land for a Palestinian state.

He advocated the implementation of UN resolutions, which defined Jewish
settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory as illegal and he called
for their removal.

A cardinal political sin

McCloskey believed that he was being consistent with his own government's
position, which was that the settlements were illegal, provocative and
impediments to peace. They would, he contended, only provoke more terror in
the future. But he soon realized that he had committed the cardinal
political sin. He had offended AIPAC.

He sealed his fate by putting his money where his mouth was.

To pressure Israel to comply with the United Nations resolutions, McCloskey
put forward a controversial resolution. He moved that the United States
withhold $150 million in aid to Israel.

That was the amount that Israel was spending to subsidize the settlement
activity. While many Congressmen agreed with him, including many Jewish
American members, it was to be Pete McCloskey's last political hurrah. Under
pressure, he withdrew his amendment.
Nevertheless, AIPAC mobilized against him and accused him of fostering
anti-Semitism; AIPAC had lobbied hard and successfully to make sure the
amendment never saw the light of day. It then poured resources and funds
into his opponents' election campaigns and Pete McCloskey, marine hero, on
the right side of every other issue, was consigned to the history books.

McCloskey's fate was to be an object lesson for all other American
politicians and even those in some other countries.



Soros adds voice to debate over Israel lobby
Sun Apr 15, 11:39 PM

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/070416/us/usreport_usa_israel_lobby_dc&pr
inter=1

By Bernd Debusmann, Special Correspondent
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The billionaire investor George Soros has added his
voice to a heated but little-noticed debate over the role of Israel's
powerful lobby in shaping Washington policy in a way critics say hurts U.S.
national interests and stifles debate.
In the current issue of the New York Review of Books, Soros takes issue with
"the pervasive influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC)" in Washington and says the Bush administration's close ties with
Israel are obstacles to a peace settlement between Israel and the
Palestinians.
Soros, who is Jewish but not often engaged in Israel affairs, echoed
arguments that have fueled a passionate debate conducted largely in the
rarefied world of academia, foreign policy think tanks and parts of the U.S.
Jewish community.

"The pro-Israel lobby has been remarkably successful in suppressing
criticism," wrote Soros. Politicians challenge it at their peril and
dissenters risk personal vilification, he said.

AIPAC has consistently declined comment on such charges, but many of its
supporters have been vocal in dismissing them. Historian Michael Oren,
speaking at AIPAC's 2007 conference in March, said the group was not merely
a lobby for Israel. "It is the embodiment of a conviction as old as this
(American) nation itself that belief in the Jewish state is tantamount to
belief in these United States," he said in a keynote speech.

The long-simmering debate bubbled to the surface a year ago, when two
prominent academics, Stephen Walt of Harvard and John Mearsheimer of the
University of Chicago, published a 12,500-word essay entitled "The Israel
Lobby" and featuring the fiercest criticism of AIPAC since it was founded in
1953.
AIPAC now has more than 100,000 members and is rated one of the most
influential special interest groups in the United States, its political
clout comparable with such lobbies as the National Rifle Association.

Its annual conference in Washington attracts a Who's Who of American
politics, both Republicans and Democrats.

UNWAVERING SUPPORT

Mearsheimer and Walt said the lobby had persuaded successive administrations
to align themselves too closely with Israel.
"The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort to
spread 'democracy' has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized not
only U.S. security but much of the rest of the world," they wrote.

No other lobby group has managed to divert U.S. foreign policy so far from
the U.S. national interest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that
U.S. interests and those of Israel are essentially identical, they wrote.
Once considered an honest broker in the Middle East, the United States is
now seen in much of the Arab world as an unquestioning backer of Israel,
according to international opinion polls.

Peace moves have been at a near-standstill since the failure of
Israeli-Palestinian talks in 2000 at the end of Bill Clinton's presidency.
The Bush administration, accused by the Arab world of relative neglect, has
said it hopes to promote peace in its final two years despite the political
weakness of Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

The two academics said that pressure from Israel and its lobby in Washington
played an important role in President George W. Bush's decision to attack
Iraq, an arch-enemy of Israel, in 2003.

Mearsheimer and Walt found no takers for their essay in the U.S. publishing
world. When it was eventually published in the London Review of Books, they
noted it would be hard to imagine any mainstream media outlet in the United
States publishing such a piece.

It has been drawing criticism that ranged from shoddy scholarship to
anti-Semitism, chiefly from conservative fellow academics and political
supporters of the present relationship between Washington and Israel.

In his contribution to the debate, Soros said: "A much-needed
self-examination of American policy in the Middle East has started in this
country; but it can't make much headway as long as AIPAC retains powerful
influence in both the Democratic and Republican parties."

That influence is reflected by the fact that Israel is the largest recipient
of U.S. aid in the world.

GOING MAINSTREAM

Mearsheimer and Walt are now working on expanding their article into a
book -- to be published in September by Farrar, Straus and Giroux. The
company has not commented on online reports that it paid the two authors a
$750,000 advance and plans to print one million copies.
Another mainstream publisher, Simon and Schuster, already discovered that it
not only is it possible to publish criticism of Israel but it can also be
good for the bottom line.

Former President Jimmy Carter's book "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid" shot up
the bestseller lists after its publication last November, stayed there for
more than three months and is still selling well.

It had an initial print run of 300,000 copies and there are now 485,000
copies in print, said Victoria Meyer, a spokeswoman for Simon and Schuster.
Carter's book and its reference to apartheid provoked angry reactions --
more in the United States than in Israel, where leftists opposed to the
occupation of the West Bank have been accusing the government of apartheid
practices for years and where the word has lost its shock value.
In response to charges of bias and anti-Semitism, Carter said he wanted to
provoke a discussion of issues debated routinely and freely in Israel but
rarely in the United States.

"This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is
because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the American Israel
Political Action Committee and the absence of any significant contrary
voices," he wrote in the Los Angeles Times during a tour to promote his
book. "It would be almost politically suicidal for members of Congress to
espouse a balanced position between Israel and Palestine."

According to Oren, the pro-AIPAC historian, the Carter book and the
Mearsheimer-Walt paper had the same "insidious thesis" and suffered from the
same flaw -- ignoring oil as a driving element in U.S. policies on the
Middle East.



The Israel Lobby
John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
For the past several decades, and especially since the Six-Day War in 1967,
the centrepiece of US Middle Eastern policy has been its relationship with
Israel. The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related
effort to spread 'democracy' throughout the region has inflamed Arab and
Islamic opinion and jeopardised not only US security but that of much of the
rest of the world. This situation has no equal in American political
history. Why has the US been willing to set aside its own security and that
of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?
One might assume that the bond between the two countries was based on shared
strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives, but neither explanation
can account for the remarkable level of material and diplomatic support that
the US provides.
Instead, the thrust of US policy in the region derives almost entirely from
domestic politics, and especially the activities of the 'Israel Lobby'.
Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no
lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would
suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that US interests and
those of the other country - in this case, Israel - are essentially
identical.
Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level
of support dwarfing that given to any other state. It has been the largest
annual recipient of direct economic and military assistance since 1976, and
is the largest recipient in total since World War Two, to the tune of well
over $140 billion (in 2004 dollars). Israel receives about $3 billion in
direct assistance each year, roughly one-fifth of the foreign aid budget,
and worth about $500 a year for every Israeli. This largesse is especially
striking since Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita
income roughly equal to that of South Korea or Spain.
Other recipients get their money in quarterly installments, but Israel
receives its entire appropriation at the beginning of each fiscal year and
can thus earn interest on it. Most recipients of aid given for military
purposes are required to spend all of it in the US, but Israel is allowed to
use roughly 25 per cent of its allocation to subsidise its own defence
industry. It is the only recipient that does not have to account for how the
aid is spent, which makes it virtually impossible to prevent the money from
being used for purposes the US opposes, such as building settlements on the
West Bank. Moreover, the US has provided Israel with nearly $3 billion to
develop weapons systems, and given it access to such top-drawer weaponry as
Blackhawk helicopters and F-16 jets. Finally, the US gives Israel access to
intelligence it denies to its Nato allies and has turned a blind eye to
Israel's acquisition of nuclear weapons.
Washington also provides Israel with consistent diplomatic support. Since
1982, the US has vetoed 32 Security Council resolutions critical of Israel,
more than the total number of vetoes cast by all the other Security Council
members. It blocks the efforts of Arab states to put Israel's nuclear
arsenal on the IAEA's agenda. The US comes to the rescue in wartime and
takes Israel's side when negotiating peace. The Nixon administration
protected it from the threat of Soviet intervention and resupplied it during
the October War. Washington was deeply involved in the negotiations that
ended that war, as well as in the lengthy 'step-by-step' process that
followed, just as it played a key role in the negotiations that preceded and
followed the 1993 Oslo Accords. In each case there was occasional friction
between US and Israeli officials, but the US consistently supported the
Israeli position. One American participant at Camp David in 2000 later said:
'Far too often, we functioned . . . as Israel's lawyer.' Finally, the Bush
administration's ambition to transform the Middle East is at least partly
aimed at improving Israel's strategic situation.
This extraordinary generosity might be understandable if Israel were a vital
strategic asset or if there were a compelling moral case for US backing. But
neither explanation is convincing. One might argue that Israel was an asset
during the Cold War. By serving as America's proxy after 1967, it helped
contain Soviet expansion in the region and inflicted humiliating defeats on
Soviet clients like Egypt and Syria. It occasionally helped protect other US
allies (like King Hussein of Jordan) and its military prowess forced Moscow
to spend more on backing its own client states. It also provided useful
intelligence about Soviet capabilities.
Backing Israel was not cheap, however, and it complicated America's
relations with the Arab world. For example, the decision to give $2.2
billion in emergency military aid during the October War triggered an Opec
oil embargo that inflicted considerable damage on Western economies. For all
that, Israel's armed forces were not in a position to protect US interests
in the region. The US could not, for example, rely on Israel when the
Iranian Revolution in 1979 raised concerns about the security of oil
supplies, and had to create its own Rapid Deployment Force instead.
The first Gulf War revealed the extent to which Israel was becoming a
strategic burden. The US could not use Israeli bases without rupturing the
anti-Iraq coalition, and had to divert resources (e.g. Patriot missile
batteries) to prevent Tel Aviv doing anything that might harm the alliance
against Saddam Hussein. History repeated itself in 2003: although Israel was
eager for the US to attack Iraq, Bush could not ask it to help without
triggering Arab opposition. So Israel stayed on the sidelines once again.
Beginning in the 1990s, and even more after 9/11, US support has been
justified by the claim that both states are threatened by terrorist groups
originating in the Arab and Muslim world, and by 'rogue states' that back
these groups and seek weapons of mass destruction. This is taken to mean not
only that Washington should give Israel a free hand in dealing with the
Palestinians and not press it to make concessions until all Palestinian
terrorists are imprisoned or dead, but that the US should go after countries
like Iran and Syria. Israel is thus seen as a crucial ally in the war on
terror, because its enemies are America's enemies. In fact, Israel is a
liability in the war on terror and the broader effort to deal with rogue
states.
'Terrorism' is not a single adversary, but a tactic employed by a wide array
of political groups. The terrorist organisations that threaten Israel do not
threaten the United States, except when it intervenes against them (as in
Lebanon in 1982). Moreover, Palestinian terrorism is not random violence
directed against Israel or 'the West'; it is largely a response to Israel's
prolonged campaign to colonise the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
More important, saying that Israel and the US are united by a shared
terrorist threat has the causal relationship backwards: the US has a
terrorism problem in good part because it is so closely allied with Israel,
not the other way around. Support for Israel is not the only source of
anti-American terrorism, but it is an important one, and it makes winning
the war on terror more difficult. There is no question that many al-Qaida
leaders, including Osama bin Laden, are motivated by Israel's presence in
Jerusalem and the plight of the Palestinians. Unconditional support for
Israel makes it easier for extremists to rally popular support and to
attract recruits.
As for so-called rogue states in the Middle East, they are not a dire threat
to vital US interests, except inasmuch as they are a threat to Israel. Even
if these states acquire nuclear weapons - which is obviously undesirable -
neither America nor Israel could be blackmailed, because the blackmailer
could not carry out the threat without suffering overwhelming retaliation.
The danger of a nuclear handover to terrorists is equally remote, because a
rogue state could not be sure the transfer would go undetected or that it
would not be blamed and punished afterwards. The relationship with Israel
actually makes it harder for the US to deal with these states. Israel's
nuclear arsenal is one reason some of its neighbours want nuclear weapons,
and threatening them with regime change merely increases that desire.
A final reason to question Israel's strategic value is that it does not
behave like a loyal ally. Israeli officials frequently ignore US requests
and renege on promises (including pledges to stop building settlements and
to refrain from 'targeted assassinations' of Palestinian leaders). Israel
has provided sensitive military technology to potential rivals like China,
in what the State Department inspector-general called 'a systematic and
growing pattern of unauthorised transfers'. According to the General
Accounting Office, Israel also 'conducts the most aggressive espionage
operations against the US of any ally'. In addition to the case of Jonathan
Pollard, who gave Israel large quantities of classified material in the
early 1980s (which it reportedly passed on to the Soviet Union in return for
more exit visas for Soviet Jews), a new controversy erupted in 2004 when it
was revealed that a key Pentagon official called Larry Franklin had passed
classified information to an Israeli diplomat. Israel is hardly the only
country that spies on the US, but its willingness to spy on its principal
patron casts further doubt on its strategic value.
Israel's strategic value isn't the only issue. Its backers also argue that
it deserves unqualified support because it is weak and surrounded by
enemies; it is a democracy; the Jewish people have suffered from past crimes
and therefore deserve special treatment; and Israel's conduct has been
morally superior to that of its adversaries. On close inspection, none of
these arguments is persuasive. There is a strong moral case for supporting
Israel's existence, but that is not in jeopardy. Viewed objectively, its
past and present conduct offers no moral basis for privileging it over the
Palestinians.
Israel is often portrayed as David confronted by Goliath, but the converse
is closer to the truth. Contrary to popular belief, the Zionists had larger,
better equipped and better led forces during the 1947-49 War of
Independence, and the Israel Defence Forces won quick and easy victories
against Egypt in 1956 and against Egypt, Jordan and Syria in 1967 - all of
this before large-scale US aid began flowing. Today, Israel is the strongest
military power in the Middle East. Its conventional forces are far superior
to those of its neighbours and it is the only state in the region with
nuclear weapons. Egypt and Jordan have signed peace treaties with it, and
Saudi Arabia has offered to do so. Syria has lost its Soviet patron, Iraq
has been devastated by three disastrous wars and Iran is hundreds of miles
away. The Palestinians barely have an effective police force, let alone an
army that could pose a threat to Israel. According to a 2005 assessment by
Tel Aviv University's Jaffee Centre for Strategic Studies, 'the strategic
balance decidedly favours Israel, which has continued to widen the
qualitative gap between its own military capability and deterrence powers
and those of its neighbours.' If backing the underdog were a compelling
motive, the United States would be supporting Israel's opponents.
That Israel is a fellow democracy surrounded by hostile dictatorships cannot
account for the current level of aid: there are many democracies around the
world, but none receives the same lavish support. The US has overthrown
democratic governments in the past and supported dictators when this was
thought to advance its interests - it has good relations with a number of
dictatorships today.
Some aspects of Israeli democracy are at odds with core American values.
Unlike the US, where people are supposed to enjoy equal rights irrespective
of race, religion or ethnicity, Israel was explicitly founded as a Jewish
state and citizenship is based on the principle of blood kinship. Given
this, it is not surprising that its 1.3 million Arabs are treated as
second-class citizens, or that a recent Israeli government commission found
that Israel behaves in a 'neglectful and discriminatory' manner towards
them. Its democratic status is also undermined by its refusal to grant the
Palestinians a viable state of their own or full political rights.
A third justification is the history of Jewish suffering in the Christian
West, especially during the Holocaust. Because Jews were persecuted for
centuries and could feel safe only in a Jewish homeland, many people now
believe that Israel deserves special treatment from the United States. The
country's creation was undoubtedly an appropriate response to the long
record of crimes against Jews, but it also brought about fresh crimes
against a largely innocent third party: the Palestinians.
This was well understood by Israel's early leaders. David Ben-Gurion told
Nahum Goldmann, the president of the World Jewish Congress:
If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is
natural: we have taken their country . . . We come from Israel, but two
thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-semitism,
the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one
thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept
that?
Since then, Israeli leaders have repeatedly sought to deny the Palestinians'
national ambitions. When she was prime minister, Golda Meir famously
remarked that 'there is no such thing as a Palestinian.' Pressure from
extremist violence and Palestinian population growth has forced subsequent
Israeli leaders to disengage from the Gaza Strip and consider other
territorial compromises, but not even Yitzhak Rabin was willing to offer the
Palestinians a viable state. Ehud Barak's purportedly generous offer at Camp
David would have given them only a disarmed set of Bantustans under de facto
Israeli control. The tragic history of the Jewish people does not obligate
the US to help Israel today no matter what it does.
Israel's backers also portray it as a country that has sought peace at every
turn and shown great restraint even when provoked. The Arabs, by contrast,
are said to have acted with great wickedness. Yet on the ground, Israel's
record is not distinguishable from that of its opponents. Ben-Gurion
acknowledged that the early Zionists were far from benevolent towards the
Palestinian Arabs, who resisted their encroachments - which is hardly
surprising, given that the Zionists were trying to create their own state on
Arab land. In the same way, the creation of Israel in 1947-48 involved acts
of ethnic cleansing, including executions, massacres and rapes by Jews, and
Israel's subsequent conduct has often been brutal, belying any claim to
moral superiority. Between 1949 and 1956, for example, Israeli security
forces killed between 2700 and 5000 Arab infiltrators, the overwhelming
majority of them unarmed. The IDF murdered hundreds of Egyptian prisoners of
war in both the 1956 and 1967 wars, while in 1967, it expelled between
100,000 and 260,000 Palestinians from the newly conquered West Bank, and
drove 80,000 Syrians from the Golan Heights.
During the first intifada, the IDF distributed truncheons to its troops and
encouraged them to break the bones of Palestinian protesters. The Swedish
branch of Save the Children estimated that '23,600 to 29,900 children
required medical treatment for their beating injuries in the first two years
of the intifada.' Nearly a third of them were aged ten or under. The
response to the second intifada has been even more violent, leading Ha'aretz
to declare that 'the IDF . . . is turning into a killing machine whose
efficiency is awe-inspiring, yet shocking.' The IDF fired one million
bullets in the first days of the uprising. Since then, for every Israeli
lost, Israel has killed 3.4 Palestinians, the majority of whom have been
innocent bystanders; the ratio of Palestinian to Israeli children killed is
even higher (5.7:1). It is also worth bearing in mind that the Zionists
relied on terrorist bombs to drive the British from Palestine, and that
Yitzhak Shamir, once a terrorist and later prime minister, declared that
'neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a
means of combat.'
The Palestinian resort to terrorism is wrong but it isn't surprising. The
Palestinians believe they have no other way to force Israeli concessions. As
Ehud Barak once admitted, had he been born a Palestinian, he 'would have
joined a terrorist organisation'.
So if neither strategic nor moral arguments can account for America's
support for Israel, how are we to explain it?
The explanation is the unmatched power of the Israel Lobby. We use 'the
Lobby' as shorthand for the loose coalition of individuals and organisations
who actively work to steer US foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction. This
is not meant to suggest that 'the Lobby' is a unified movement with a
central leadership, or that individuals within it do not disagree on certain
issues. Not all Jewish Americans are part of the Lobby, because Israel is
not a salient issue for many of them. In a 2004 survey, for example, roughly
36 per cent of American Jews said they were either 'not very' or 'not at
all'
emotionally attached to Israel.
Jewish Americans also differ on specific Israeli policies. Many of the key
organisations in the Lobby, such as the American-Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC) and the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish
Organisations, are run by hardliners who generally support the Likud Party's
expansionist policies, including its hostility to the Oslo peace process.
The bulk of US Jewry, meanwhile, is more inclined to make concessions to the
Palestinians, and a few groups - such as Jewish Voice for Peace - strongly
advocate such steps. Despite these differences, moderates and hardliners
both favour giving steadfast support to Israel.
Not surprisingly, American Jewish leaders often consult Israeli officials,
to make sure that their actions advance Israeli goals. As one activist from
a major Jewish organisation wrote, 'it is routine for us to say: "This is
our policy on a certain issue, but we must check what the Israelis think."
We as a community do it all the time.' There is a strong prejudice against
criticising Israeli policy, and putting pressure on Israel is considered out
of order. Edgar Bronfman Sr, the president of the World Jewish Congress, was
accused of 'perfidy' when he wrote a letter to President Bush in mid-2003
urging him to persuade Israel to curb construction of its controversial
'security fence'. His critics said that 'it would be obscene at any time for
the president of the World Jewish Congress to lobby the president of the
United States to resist policies being promoted by the government of
Israel.'
Similarly, when the president of the Israel Policy Forum, Seymour Reich,
advised Condoleezza Rice in November 2005 to ask Israel to reopen a critical
border crossing in the Gaza Strip, his action was denounced as
'irresponsible': 'There is,' his critics said, 'absolutely no room in the
Jewish mainstream for actively canvassing against the security-related
policies . . . of Israel.' Recoiling from these attacks, Reich announced
that 'the word "pressure" is not in my vocabulary when it comes to Israel.'
Jewish Americans have set up an impressive array of organisations to
influence American foreign policy, of which AIPAC is the most powerful and
best known. In 1997, Fortune magazine asked members of Congress and their
staffs to list the most powerful lobbies in Washington. AIPAC was ranked
second behind the American Association of Retired People, but ahead of the
AFL-CIO and the National Rifle Association. A National Journal study in
March 2005 reached a similar conclusion, placing AIPAC in second place (tied
with AARP) in the Washington 'muscle rankings'.
The Lobby also includes prominent Christian evangelicals like Gary Bauer,
Jerry Falwell, Ralph Reed and Pat Robertson, as well as Dick Armey and Tom
DeLay, former majority leaders in the House of Representatives, all of whom
believe Israel's rebirth is the fulfilment of biblical prophecy and support
its expansionist agenda; to do otherwise, they believe, would be contrary to
God's will. Neo-conservative gentiles such as John Bolton; Robert Bartley,
the former Wall Street Journal editor; William Bennett, the former secretary
of education; Jeane Kirkpatrick, the former UN ambassador; and the
influential columnist George Will are also steadfast supporters.
The US form of government offers activists many ways of influencing the
policy process. Interest groups can lobby elected representatives and
members of the executive branch, make campaign contributions, vote in
elections, try to mould public opinion etc. They enjoy a disproportionate
amount of influence when they are committed to an issue to which the bulk of
the population is indifferent. Policymakers will tend to accommodate those
who care about the issue, even if their numbers are small, confident that
the rest of the population will not penalise them for doing so.
In its basic operations, the Israel Lobby is no different from the farm
lobby, steel or textile workers' unions, or other ethnic lobbies. There is
nothing improper about American Jews and their Christian allies attempting
to sway US policy: the Lobby's activities are not a conspiracy of the sort
depicted in tracts like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. For the most
part, the individuals and groups that comprise it are only doing what other
special interest groups do, but doing it very much better. By contrast,
pro-Arab interest groups, in so far as they exist at all, are weak, which
makes the Israel Lobby's task even easier.
The Lobby pursues two broad strategies. First, it wields its significant
influence in Washington, pressuring both Congress and the executive branch.
Whatever an individual lawmaker or policymaker's own views may be, the Lobby
tries to make supporting Israel the 'smart' choice. Second, it strives to
ensure that public discourse portrays Israel in a positive light, by
repeating myths about its founding and by promoting its point of view in
policy debates. The goal is to prevent critical comments from getting a fair
hearing in the political arena. Controlling the debate is essential to
guaranteeing US support, because a candid discussion of US-Israeli relations
might lead Americans to favour a different policy.
A key pillar of the Lobby's effectiveness is its influence in Congress,
where Israel is virtually immune from criticism. This in itself is
remarkable, because Congress rarely shies away from contentious issues.
Where Israel is concerned, however, potential critics fall silent. One
reason is that some key members are Christian Zionists like Dick Armey, who
said in September 2002: 'My No. 1 priority in foreign policy is to protect
Israel.' One might think that the No. 1 priority for any congressman would
be to protect America. There are also Jewish senators and congressmen who
work to ensure that US foreign policy supports Israel's interests.
Another source of the Lobby's power is its use of pro-Israel congressional
staffers. As Morris Amitay, a former head of AIPAC, once admitted, 'there
are a lot of guys at the working level up here' - on Capitol Hill - 'who
happen to be Jewish, who are willing . . . to look at certain issues in
terms of their Jewishness . . . These are all guys who are in a position to
make the decision in these areas for those senators . . . You can get an
awful lot done just at the staff level.'
AIPAC itself, however, forms the core of the Lobby's influence in Congress.
Its success is due to its ability to reward legislators and congressional
candidates who support its agenda, and to punish those who challenge it.
Money is critical to US elections (as the scandal over the lobbyist Jack
Abramoff's shady dealings reminds us), and AIPAC makes sure that its friends
get strong financial support from the many pro-Israel political action
committees. Anyone who is seen as hostile to Israel can be sure that AIPAC
will direct campaign contributions to his or her political opponents. AIPAC
also organises letter-writing campaigns and encourages newspaper editors to
endorse pro-Israel candidates.
There is no doubt about the efficacy of these tactics. Here is one example:
in the 1984 elections, AIPAC helped defeat Senator Charles Percy from
Illinois, who, according to a prominent Lobby figure, had 'displayed
insensitivity and even hostility to our concerns'. Thomas Dine, the head of
AIPAC at the time, explained what happened: 'All the Jews in America, from
coast to coast, gathered to oust Percy. And the American politicians - those
who hold public positions now, and those who aspire - got the message.'
AIPAC's influence on Capitol Hill goes even further. According to Douglas
Bloomfield, a former AIPAC staff member, 'it is common for members of
Congress and their staffs to turn to AIPAC first when they need information,
before calling the Library of Congress, the Congressional Research Service,
committee staff or administration experts.' More important, he notes that
AIPAC is 'often called on to draft speeches, work on legislation, advise on
tactics, perform research, collect co-sponsors and marshal votes'.
The bottom line is that AIPAC, a de facto agent for a foreign government,
has a stranglehold on Congress, with the result that US policy towards
Israel is not debated there, even though that policy has important
consequences for the entire world. In other words, one of the three main
branches of the government is firmly committed to supporting Israel. As one
former Democratic senator, Ernest Hollings, noted on leaving office, 'you
can't have an Israeli policy other than what AIPAC gives you around here.'
Or as Ariel Sharon once told an American audience, 'when people ask me how
they can help Israel, I tell them: "Help AIPAC."'
Thanks in part to the influence Jewish voters have on presidential
elections, the Lobby also has significant leverage over the executive
branch. Although they make up fewer than 3 per cent of the population, they
make large campaign donations to candidates from both parties. The
Washington Post once estimated that Democratic presidential candidates
'depend on Jewish supporters to supply as much as 60 per cent of the money'.
And because Jewish voters have high turn-out rates and are concentrated in
key states like California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Pennsylvania,
presidential candidates go to great lengths not to antagonise them.
Key organisations in the Lobby make it their business to ensure that critics
of Israel do not get important foreign policy jobs. Jimmy Carter wanted to
make George Ball his first secretary of state, but knew that Ball was seen
as critical of Israel and that the Lobby would oppose the appointment. In
this way any aspiring policymaker is encouraged to become an overt supporter
of Israel, which is why public critics of Israeli policy have become an
endangered species in the foreign policy establishment.
When Howard Dean called for the United States to take a more 'even-handed
role' in the Arab-Israeli conflict, Senator Joseph Lieberman accused him of
selling Israel down the river and said his statement was 'irresponsible'.
Virtually all the top Democrats in the House signed a letter criticising
Dean's remarks, and the Chicago Jewish Star reported that 'anonymous
attackers . . . are clogging the email inboxes of Jewish leaders around the
country, warning - without much evidence - that Dean would somehow be bad
for Israel.'
This worry was absurd; Dean is in fact quite hawkish on Israel: his campaign
co-chair was a former AIPAC president, and Dean said his own views on the
Middle East more closely reflected those of AIPAC than those of the more
moderate Americans for Peace Now. He had merely suggested that to 'bring the
sides together', Washington should act as an honest broker. This is hardly a
radical idea, but the Lobby doesn't tolerate even-handedness.
During the Clinton administration, Middle Eastern policy was largely shaped
by officials with close ties to Israel or to prominent pro-Israel
organisations; among them, Martin Indyk, the former deputy director of
research at AIPAC and co-founder of the pro-Israel Washington Institute for
Near East Policy (WINEP); Dennis Ross, who joined WINEP after leaving
government in 2001; and Aaron Miller, who has lived in Israel and often
visits the country. These men were among Clinton's closest advisers at the
Camp David summit in July 2000. Although all three supported the Oslo peace
process and favoured the creation of a Palestinian state, they did so only
within the limits of what would be acceptable to Israel. The American
delegation took its cues from Ehud Barak, co-ordinated its negotiating
positions with Israel in advance, and did not offer independent proposals.
Not surprisingly, Palestinian negotiators complained that they were
'negotiating with two Israeli teams - one displaying an Israeli flag, and
one an American flag'.
The situation is even more pronounced in the Bush administration, whose
ranks have included such fervent advocates of the Israeli cause as Elliot
Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, I. Lewis ('Scooter') Libby, Richard
Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and David Wurmser. As we shall see, these officials
have consistently pushed for policies favoured by Israel and backed by
organisations in the Lobby.
The Lobby doesn't want an open debate, of course, because that might lead
Americans to question the level of support they provide. Accordingly,
pro-Israel organisations work hard to influence the institutions that do
most to shape popular opinion.
The Lobby's perspective prevails in the mainstream media: the debate among
Middle East pundits, the journalist Eric Alterman writes, is 'dominated by
people who cannot imagine criticising Israel'. He lists 61 'columnists and
commentators who can be counted on to support Israel reflexively and without
qualification'. Conversely, he found just five pundits who consistently
criticise Israeli actions or endorse Arab positions. Newspapers occasionally
publish guest op-eds challenging Israeli policy, but the balance of opinion
clearly favours the other side. It is hard to imagine any mainstream media
outlet in the United States publishing a piece like this one.
'Shamir, Sharon, Bibi - whatever those guys want is pretty much fine by me,'
Robert Bartley once remarked. Not surprisingly, his newspaper, the Wall
Street Journal, along with other prominent papers like the Chicago Sun-Times
and the Washington Times, regularly runs editorials that strongly support
Israel. Magazines like Commentary, the New Republic and the Weekly Standard
defend Israel at every turn.
Editorial bias is also found in papers like the New York Times, which
occasionally criticises Israeli policies and sometimes concedes that the
Palestinians have legitimate grievances, but is not even-handed. In his
memoirs the paper's former executive editor Max Frankel acknowledges the
impact his own attitude had on his editorial decisions: 'I was much more
deeply devoted to Israel than I dared to assert . . . Fortified by my
knowledge of Israel and my friendships there, I myself wrote most of our
Middle East commentaries. As more Arab than Jewish readers recognised, I
wrote them from a pro-Israel perspective.'
News reports are more even-handed, in part because reporters strive to be
objective, but also because it is difficult to cover events in the Occupied
Territories without acknowledging Israel's actions on the ground. To
discourage unfavourable reporting, the Lobby organises letter-writing
campaigns, demonstrations and boycotts of news outlets whose content it
considers anti-Israel. One CNN executive has said that he sometimes gets
6000 email messages in a single day complaining about a story. In May 2003,
the pro-Israel Committee for Accurate Middle East Reporting in America
(CAMERA) organised demonstrations outside National Public Radio stations in
33 cities; it also tried to persuade contributors to withhold support from
NPR until its Middle East coverage becomes more sympathetic to Israel.
Boston's NPR station, WBUR, reportedly lost more than $1 million in
contributions as a result of these efforts. Further pressure on NPR has come
from Israel's friends in Congress, who have asked for an internal audit of
its Middle East coverage as well as more oversight.
The Israeli side also dominates the think tanks which play an important role
in shaping public debate as well as actual policy. The Lobby created its own
think tank in 1985, when Martin Indyk helped to found WINEP. Although WINEP
plays down its links to Israel, claiming instead to provide a 'balanced and
realistic' perspective on Middle East issues, it is funded and run by
individuals deeply committed to advancing Israel's agenda.
The Lobby's influence extends well beyond WINEP, however. Over the past 25
years, pro-Israel forces have established a commanding presence at the
American Enterprise Institute, the Brookings Institution, the Center for
Security Policy, the Foreign Policy Research Institute, the Heritage
Foundation, the Hudson Institute, the Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis
and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). These think
tanks employ few, if any, critics of US support for Israel.
Take the Brookings Institution. For many years, its senior expert on the
Middle East was William Quandt, a former NSC official with a well-deserved
reputation for even-handedness. Today, Brookings's coverage is conducted
through the Saban Center for Middle East Studies, which is financed by Haim
Saban, an Israeli-American businessman and ardent Zionist. The centre's
director is the ubiquitous Martin Indyk. What was once a non-partisan policy
institute is now part of the pro-Israel chorus.
Where the Lobby has had the most difficulty is in stifling debate on
university campuses. In the 1990s, when the Oslo peace process was underway,
there was only mild criticism of Israel, but it grew stronger with Oslo's
collapse and Sharon's access to power, becoming quite vociferous when the
IDF reoccupied the West Bank in spring 2002 and employed massive force to
subdue the second intifada.
The Lobby moved immediately to 'take back the campuses'. New groups sprang
up, like the Caravan for Democracy, which brought Israeli speakers to US
colleges. Established groups like the Jewish Council for Public Affairs and
Hillel joined in, and a new group, the Israel on Campus Coalition, was
formed to co-ordinate the many bodies that now sought to put Israel's case.
Finally, AIPAC more than tripled its spending on programmes to monitor
university activities and to train young advocates, in order to 'vastly
expand the number of students involved on campus . . . in the national
pro-Israel effort'.
The Lobby also monitors what professors write and teach. In September 2002,
Martin Kramer and Daniel Pipes, two passionately pro-Israel
neo-conservatives, established a website (Campus Watch) that posted dossiers
on suspect academics and encouraged students to report remarks or behaviour
that might be considered hostile to Israel. This transparent attempt to
blacklist and intimidate scholars provoked a harsh reaction and Pipes and
Kramer later removed the dossiers, but the website still invites students to
report 'anti-Israel' activity.
Groups within the Lobby put pressure on particular academics and
universities. Columbia has been a frequent target, no doubt because of the
presence of the late Edward Said on its faculty. 'One can be sure that any
public statement in support of the Palestinian people by the pre-eminent
literary critic Edward Said will elicit hundreds of emails, letters and
journalistic accounts that call on us to denounce Said and to either
sanction or fire him,' Jonathan Cole, its former provost, reported. When
Columbia recruited the historian Rashid Khalidi from Chicago, the same thing
happened. It was a problem Princeton also faced a few years later when it
considered wooing Khalidi away from Columbia.
A classic illustration of the effort to police academia occurred towards the
end of 2004, when the David Project produced a film alleging that faculty
members of Columbia's Middle East Studies programme were anti-semitic and
were intimidating Jewish students who stood up for Israel. Columbia was
hauled over the coals, but a faculty committee which was assigned to
investigate the charges found no evidence of anti-semitism and the only
incident possibly worth noting was that one professor had 'responded
heatedly' to a student's question. The committee also discovered that the
academics in question had themselves been the target of an overt campaign of
intimidation.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of all this is the efforts Jewish groups
have made to push Congress into establishing mechanisms to monitor what
professors say. If they manage to get this passed, universities judged to
have an anti-Israel bias would be denied federal funding. Their efforts have
not yet succeeded, but they are an indication of the importance placed on
controlling debate.
A number of Jewish philanthropists have recently established Israel Studies
programmes (in addition to the roughly 130 Jewish Studies programmes already
in existence) so as to increase the number of Israel-friendly scholars on
campus. In May 2003, NYU announced the establishment of the Taub Center for
Israel Studies; similar programmes have been set up at Berkeley, Brandeis
and Emory. Academic administrators emphasise their pedagogical value, but
the truth is that they are intended in large part to promote Israel's image.
Fred Laffer, the head of the Taub Foundation, makes it clear that his
foundation funded the NYU centre to help counter the 'Arabic [sic] point of
view' that he thinks is prevalent in NYU's Middle East programmes.
No discussion of the Lobby would be complete without an examination of one
of its most powerful weapons: the charge of anti-semitism. Anyone who
criticises Israel's actions or argues that pro-Israel groups have
significant influence over US Middle Eastern policy - an influence AIPAC
celebrates - stands a good chance of being labelled an anti-semite. Indeed,
anyone who merely claims that there is an Israel Lobby runs the risk of
being charged with anti-semitism, even though the Israeli media refer to
America's 'Jewish Lobby'. In other words, the Lobby first boasts of its
influence and then attacks anyone who calls attention to it. It's a very
effective tactic: anti-semitism is something no one wants to be accused of.
Europeans have been more willing than Americans to criticise Israeli policy,
which some people attribute to a resurgence of anti-semitism in Europe. We
are 'getting to a point', the US ambassador to the EU said in early 2004,
'where it is as bad as it was in the 1930s'. Measuring anti-semitism is a
complicated matter, but the weight of evidence points in the opposite
direction. In the spring of 2004, when accusations of European anti-semitism
filled the air in America, separate surveys of European public opinion
conducted by the US-based Anti-Defamation League and the Pew Research Center
for the People and the Press found that it was in fact declining. In the
1930s, by contrast, anti-semitism was not only widespread among Europeans of
all classes but considered quite acceptable.
The Lobby and its friends often portray France as the most anti-semitic
country in Europe. But in 2003, the head of the French Jewish community said
that 'France is not more anti-semitic than America.' According to a recent
article in Ha'aretz, the French police have reported that anti-semitic
incidents declined by almost 50 per cent in 2005; and this even though
France has the largest Muslim population of any European country. Finally,
when a French Jew was murdered in Paris last month by a Muslim gang, tens of
thousands of demonstrators poured into the streets to condemn anti-semitism.
Jacques Chirac and Dominique de Villepin both attended the victim's memorial
service to show their solidarity.
No one would deny that there is anti-semitism among European Muslims, some
of it provoked by Israel's conduct towards the Palestinians and some of it
straightforwardly racist. But this is a separate matter with little bearing
on whether or not Europe today is like Europe in the 1930s. Nor would anyone
deny that there are still some virulent autochthonous anti-semites in Europe
(as there are in the United States) but their numbers are small and their
views are rejected by the vast majority of Europeans.
Israel's advocates, when pressed to go beyond mere assertion, claim that
there is a 'new anti-semitism', which they equate with criticism of Israel.
In other words, criticise Israeli policy and you are by definition an
anti-semite. When the synod of the Church of England recently voted to
divest from Caterpillar Inc on the grounds that it manufactures the
bulldozers used by the Israelis to demolish Palestinian homes, the Chief
Rabbi complained that this would 'have the most adverse repercussions on . .
. Jewish-Christian relations in Britain', while Rabbi Tony Bayfield, the
head of the Reform movement, said: 'There is a clear problem of
anti-Zionist - verging on anti-semitic - attitudes emerging in the
grass-roots, and even in the middle ranks of the Church.' But the Church was
guilty merely of protesting against Israeli government policy.
Critics are also accused of holding Israel to an unfair standard or
questioning its right to exist. But these are bogus charges too. Western
critics of Israel hardly ever question its right to exist: they question its
behaviour towards the Palestinians, as do Israelis themselves. Nor is Israel
being judged unfairly. Israeli treatment of the Palestinians elicits
criticism because it is contrary to widely accepted notions of human rights,
to international law and to the principle of national self-determination.
And it is hardly the only state that has faced sharp criticism on these
grounds.
In the autumn of 2001, and especially in the spring of 2002, the Bush
administration tried to reduce anti-American sentiment in the Arab world and
undermine support for terrorist groups like al-Qaida by halting Israel's
expansionist policies in the Occupied Territories and advocating the
creation of a Palestinian state. Bush had very significant means of
persuasion at his disposal. He could have threatened to reduce economic and
diplomatic support for Israel, and the American people would almost
certainly have supported him. A May 2003 poll reported that more than 60 per
cent of Americans were willing to withhold aid if Israel resisted US
pressure to settle the conflict, and that number rose to 70 per cent among
the 'politically active'. Indeed, 73 per cent said that the United States
should not favour either side.
Yet the administration failed to change Israeli policy, and Washington ended
up backing it. Over time, the administration also adopted Israel's own
justifications of its position, so that US rhetoric began to mimic Israeli
rhetoric. By February 2003, a Washington Post headline summarised the
situation: 'Bush and Sharon Nearly Identical on Mideast Policy.' The main
reason for this switch was the Lobby.
The story begins in late September 2001, when Bush began urging Sharon to
show restraint in the Occupied Territories. He also pressed him to allow
Israel's foreign minister, Shimon Peres, to meet with Yasser Arafat, even
though he (Bush) was highly critical of Arafat's leadership. Bush even said
publicly that he supported the creation of a Palestinian state. Alarmed,
Sharon accused him of trying 'to appease the Arabs at our expense', warning
that Israel 'will not be Czechoslovakia'.
Bush was reportedly furious at being compared to Chamberlain, and the White
House press secretary called Sharon's remarks 'unacceptable'. Sharon offered
a pro forma apology, but quickly joined forces with the Lobby to persuade
the administration and the American people that the United States and Israel
faced a common threat from terrorism. Israeli officials and Lobby
representatives insisted that there was no real difference between Arafat
and Osama bin Laden: the United States and Israel, they said, should isolate
the Palestinians' elected leader and have nothing to do with him.
The Lobby also went to work in Congress. On 16 November, 89 senators sent
Bush a letter praising him for refusing to meet with Arafat, but also
demanding that the US not restrain Israel from retaliating against the
Palestinians; the administration, they wrote, must state publicly that it
stood behind Israel. According to the New York Times, the letter 'stemmed'
from a meeting two weeks before between 'leaders of the American Jewish
community and key senators', adding that AIPAC was 'particularly active in
providing advice on the letter'.
By late November, relations between Tel Aviv and Washington had improved
considerably. This was thanks in part to the Lobby's efforts, but also to
America's initial victory in Afghanistan, which reduced the perceived need
for Arab support in dealing with al-Qaida. Sharon visited the White House in
early December and had a friendly meeting with Bush.
In April 2002 trouble erupted again, after the IDF launched Operation
Defensive Shield and resumed control of virtually all the major Palestinian
areas on the West Bank. Bush knew that Israel's actions would damage
America's
image in the Islamic world and undermine the war on terrorism, so he
demanded that Sharon 'halt the incursions and begin withdrawal'. He
underscored this message two days later, saying he wanted Israel to
'withdraw without delay'. On 7 April, Condoleezza Rice, then Bush's national
security adviser, told reporters: '"Without delay" means without delay. It
means now.' That same day Colin Powell set out for the Middle East to
persuade all sides to stop fighting and start negotiating.
Israel and the Lobby swung into action. Pro-Israel officials in the
vice-president's office and the Pentagon, as well as neo-conservative
pundits like Robert Kagan and William Kristol, put the heat on Powell. They
even accused him of having 'virtually obliterated the distinction between
terrorists and those fighting terrorists'. Bush himself was being pressed by
Jewish leaders and Christian evangelicals. Tom DeLay and Dick Armey were
especially outspoken about the need to support Israel, and DeLay and the
Senate minority leader, Trent Lott, visited the White House and warned Bush
to back off.
The first sign that Bush was caving in came on 11 April - a week after he
told Sharon to withdraw his forces - when the White House press secretary
said that the president believed Sharon was 'a man of peace'. Bush repeated
this statement publicly on Powell's return from his abortive mission, and
told reporters that Sharon had responded satisfactorily to his call for a
full and immediate withdrawal. Sharon had done no such thing, but Bush was
no longer willing to make an issue of it.
Meanwhile, Congress was also moving to back Sharon. On 2 May, it overrode
the administration's objections and passed two resolutions reaffirming
support for Israel. (The Senate vote was 94 to 2; the House of
Representatives version passed 352 to 21.) Both resolutions held that the
United States 'stands in solidarity with Israel' and that the two countries
were, to quote the House resolution, 'now engaged in a common struggle
against terrorism'. The House version also condemned 'the ongoing support
and co-ordination of terror by Yasser Arafat', who was portrayed as a
central part of the terrorism problem. Both resolutions were drawn up with
the help of the Lobby. A few days later, a bipartisan congressional
delegation on a fact-finding mission to Israel stated that Sharon should
resist US pressure to negotiate with Arafat. On 9 May, a House
appropriations subcommittee met to consider giving Israel an extra $200
million to fight terrorism. Powell opposed the package, but the Lobby backed
it and Powell lost.
In short, Sharon and the Lobby took on the president of the United States
and triumphed. Hemi Shalev, a journalist on the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv,
reported that Sharon's aides 'could not hide their satisfaction in view of
Powell's failure. Sharon saw the whites of President Bush's eyes, they
bragged, and the president blinked first.' But it was Israel's champions in
the United States, not Sharon or Israel, that played the key role in
defeating Bush.
The situation has changed little since then. The Bush administration refused
ever again to have dealings with Arafat. After his death, it embraced the
new Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, but has done little to help him.
Sharon continued to develop his plan to impose a unilateral settlement on
the Palestinians, based on 'disengagement' from Gaza coupled with continued
expansion on the West Bank. By refusing to negotiate with Abbas and making
it impossible for him to deliver tangible benefits to the Palestinian
people, Sharon's strategy contributed directly to Hamas's electoral victory.
With Hamas in power, however, Israel has another excuse not to negotiate.
The US administration has supported Sharon's actions (and those of his
successor, Ehud Olmert). Bush has even endorsed unilateral Israeli
annexations in the Occupied Territories, reversing the stated policy of
every president since Lyndon Johnson.
US officials have offered mild criticisms of a few Israeli actions, but have
done little to help create a viable Palestinian state. Sharon has Bush
'wrapped around his little finger', the former national security adviser
Brent Scowcroft said in October 2004. If Bush tries to distance the US from
Israel, or even criticises Israeli actions in the Occupied Territories, he
is certain to face the wrath of the Lobby and its supporters in Congress.
Democratic presidential candidates understand that these are facts of life,
which is the reason John Kerry went to great lengths to display unalloyed
support for Israel in 2004, and why Hillary Clinton is doing the same thing
today.
Maintaining US support for Israel's policies against the Palestinians is
essential as far as the Lobby is concerned, but its ambitions do not stop
there. It also wants America to help Israel remain the dominant regional
power. The Israeli government and pro-Israel groups in the United States
have worked together to shape the administration's policy towards Iraq,
Syria and Iran, as well as its grand scheme for reordering the Middle East.
Pressure from Israel and the Lobby was not the only factor behind the
decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical. Some Americans
believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly any direct evidence
to support this claim. Instead, the war was motivated in good part by a
desire to make Israel more secure. According to Philip Zelikow, a former
member of the president's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, the executive
director of the 9/11 Commission, and now a counsellor to Condoleezza Rice,
the 'real threat' from Iraq was not a threat to the United States. The
'unstated threat' was the 'threat against Israel', Zelikow told an audience
at the University of Virginia in September 2002. 'The American government,'
he added, 'doesn't want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is
not a popular sell.'
On 16 August 2002, 11 days before Dick Cheney kicked off the campaign for
war with a hardline speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Washington
Post reported that 'Israel is urging US officials not to delay a military
strike against Iraq's Saddam Hussein.' By this point, according to Sharon,
strategic co-ordination between Israel and the US had reached 'unprecedented
dimensions', and Israeli intelligence officials had given Washington a
variety of alarming reports about Iraq's WMD programmes. As one retired
Israeli general later put it, 'Israeli intelligence was a full partner to
the picture presented by American and British intelligence regarding Iraq's
non-conventional capabilities.'
Israeli leaders were deeply distressed when Bush decided to seek Security
Council authorisation for war, and even more worried when Saddam agreed to
let UN inspectors back in. 'The campaign against Saddam Hussein is a must,'
Shimon Peres told reporters in September 2002. 'Inspections and inspectors
are good for decent people, but dishonest people can overcome easily
inspections and inspectors.'
At the same time, Ehud Barak wrote a New York Times op-ed warning that 'the
greatest risk now lies in inaction.' His predecessor as prime minister,
Binyamin Netanyahu, published a similar piece in the Wall Street Journal,
entitled: 'The Case for Toppling Saddam'. 'Today nothing less than
dismantling his regime will do,' he declared. 'I believe I speak for the
overwhelming majority of Israelis in supporting a pre-emptive strike against
Saddam's regime.' Or as Ha'aretz reported in February 2003, 'the military
and political leadership yearns for war in Iraq.'
As Netanyahu suggested, however, the desire for war was not confined to
Israel's leaders. Apart from Kuwait, which Saddam invaded in 1990, Israel
was the only country in the world where both politicians and public favoured
war. As the journalist Gideon Levy observed at the time, 'Israel is the only
country in the West whose leaders support the war unreservedly and where no
alternative opinion is voiced.' In fact, Israelis were so gung-ho that their
allies in America told them to damp down their rhetoric, or it would look as
if the war would be fought on Israel's behalf.
Within the US, the main driving force behind the war was a small band of
neo-conservatives, many with ties to Likud. But leaders of the Lobby's major
organisations lent their voices to the campaign. 'As President Bush
attempted to sell the . . . war in Iraq,' the Forward reported, 'America's
most important Jewish organisations rallied as one to his defence. In
statement after statement community leaders stressed the need to rid the
world of Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction.' The editorial
goes on to say that 'concern for Israel's safety rightfully factored into
the deliberations of the main Jewish groups.'
Although neo-conservatives and other Lobby leaders were eager to invade
Iraq, the broader American Jewish community was not. Just after the war
started, Samuel Freedman reported that 'a compilation of nationwide opinion
polls by the Pew Research Center shows that Jews are less supportive of the
Iraq war than the population at large, 52 per cent to 62 per cent.' Clearly,
it would be wrong to blame the war in Iraq on 'Jewish influence'. Rather, it
was due in large part to the Lobby's influence, especially that of the
neo-conservatives within it.
The neo-conservatives had been determined to topple Saddam even before Bush
became president. They caused a stir early in 1998 by publishing two open
letters to Clinton, calling for Saddam's removal from power. The
signatories, many of whom had close ties to pro-Israel groups like JINSA or
WINEP, and who included Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, William
Kristol, Bernard Lewis, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz,
had little trouble persuading the Clinton administration to adopt the
general goal of ousting Saddam. But they were unable to sell a war to
achieve that objective. They were no more able to generate enthusiasm for
invading Iraq in the early months of the Bush administration. They needed
help to achieve their aim. That help arrived with 9/11. Specifically, the
events of that day led Bush and Cheney to reverse course and become strong
proponents of a preventive war.
At a key meeting with Bush at Camp David on 15 September, Wolfowitz
advocated attacking Iraq before Afghanistan, even though there was no
evidence that Saddam was involved in the attacks on the US and bin Laden was
known to be in Afghanistan. Bush rejected his advice and chose to go after
Afghanistan instead, but war with Iraq was now regarded as a serious
possibility and on 21 November the president charged military planners with
developing concrete plans for an invasion.
Other neo-conservatives were meanwhile at work in the corridors of power. We
don't have the full story yet, but scholars like Bernard Lewis of Princeton
and Fouad Ajami of Johns Hopkins reportedly played important roles in
persuading Cheney that war was the best option, though neo-conservatives on
his staff - Eric Edelman, John Hannah and Scooter Libby, Cheney's chief of
staff and one of the most powerful individuals in the administration - also
played their part. By early 2002 Cheney had persuaded Bush; and with Bush
and Cheney on board, war was inevitable.
Outside the administration, neo-conservative pundits lost no time in making
the case that invading Iraq was essential to winning the war on terrorism.
Their efforts were designed partly to keep up the pressure on Bush, and
partly to overcome opposition to the war inside and outside the government.
On 20 September, a group of prominent neo-conservatives and their allies
published another open letter: 'Even if evidence does not link Iraq directly
to the attack,' it read, 'any strategy aiming at the eradication of
terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam
Hussein from power in Iraq.' The letter also reminded Bush that 'Israel has
been and remains America's staunchest ally against international terrorism.'
In the 1 October issue of the Weekly Standard, Robert Kagan and William
Kristol called for regime change in Iraq as soon as the Taliban was
defeated. That same day, Charles Krauthammer argued in the Washington Post
that after the US was done with Afghanistan, Syria should be next, followed
by Iran and Iraq: 'The war on terrorism will conclude in Baghdad,' when we
finish off 'the most dangerous terrorist regime in the world'.
This was the beginning of an unrelenting public relations campaign to win
support for an invasion of Iraq, a crucial part of which was the
manipulation of intelligence in such a way as to make it seem as if Saddam
posed an imminent threat. For example, Libby pressured CIA analysts to find
evidence supporting the case for war and helped prepare Colin Powell's now
discredited briefing to the UN Security Council. Within the Pentagon, the
Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group was charged with finding links
between al-Qaida and Iraq that the intelligence community had supposedly
missed. Its two key members were David Wurmser, a hard-core
neo-conservative, and Michael Maloof, a Lebanese-American with close ties to
Perle. Another Pentagon group, the so-called Office of Special Plans, was
given the task of uncovering evidence that could be used to sell the war. It
was headed by Abram Shulsky, a neo-conservative with long-standing ties to
Wolfowitz, and its ranks included recruits from pro-Israel think tanks. Both
these organisations were created after 9/11 and reported directly to Douglas
Feith.
Like virtually all the neo-conservatives, Feith is deeply committed to
Israel; he also has long-term ties to Likud. He wrote articles in the 1990s
supporting the settlements and arguing that Israel should retain the
Occupied Territories. More important, along with Perle and Wurmser, he wrote
the famous 'Clean Break' report in June 1996 for Netanyahu, who had just
become prime minister. Among other things, it recommended that Netanyahu
'focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq - an important Israeli
strategic objective in its own right'. It also called for Israel to take
steps to reorder the entire Middle East. Netanyahu did not follow their
advice, but Feith, Perle and Wurmser were soon urging the Bush
administration to pursue those same goals. The Ha'aretz columnist Akiva
Eldar warned that Feith and Perle 'are walking a fine line between their
loyalty to American governments . . . and Israeli interests'.
Wolfowitz is equally committed to Israel. The Forward once described him as
'the most hawkishly pro-Israel voice in the administration', and selected
him in 2002 as first among 50 notables who 'have consciously pursued Jewish
activism'. At about the same time, JINSA gave Wolfowitz its Henry M. Jackson
Distinguished Service Award for promoting a strong partnership between
Israel and the United States; and the Jerusalem Post, describing him as
'devoutly pro-Israel', named him 'Man of the Year' in 2003.
Finally, a brief word is in order about the neo-conservatives' prewar
support of Ahmed Chalabi, the unscrupulous Iraqi exile who headed the Iraqi
National Congress. They backed Chalabi because he had established close ties
with Jewish-American groups and had pledged to foster good relations with
Israel once he gained power. This was precisely what pro-Israel proponents
of regime change wanted to hear. Matthew Berger laid out the essence of the
bargain in the Jewish Journal: 'The INC saw improved relations as a way to
tap Jewish influence in Washington and Jerusalem and to drum up increased
support for its cause. For their part, the Jewish groups saw an opportunity
to pave the way for better relations between Israel and Iraq, if and when
the INC is involved in replacing Saddam Hussein's regime.'
Given the neo-conservatives' devotion to Israel, their obsession with Iraq,
and their influence in the Bush administration, it isn't surprising that
many Americans suspected that the war was designed to further Israeli
interests. Last March, Barry Jacobs of the American Jewish Committee
acknowledged that the belief that Israel and the neo-conservatives had
conspired to get the US into a war in Iraq was 'pervasive' in the
intelligence community. Yet few people would say so publicly, and most of
those who did - including Senator Ernest Hollings and Representative James
Moran - were condemned for raising the issue. Michael Kinsley wrote in late
2002 that 'the lack of public discussion about the role of Israel . . . is
the proverbial elephant in the room.' The reason for the reluctance to talk
about it, he observed, was fear of being labelled an anti-semite. There is
little doubt that Israel and the Lobby were key factors in the decision to
go to war. It's a decision the US would have been far less likely to take
without their efforts. And the war itself was intended to be only the first
step. A front-page headline in the Wall Street Journal shortly after the war
began says it all: 'President's Dream: Changing Not Just Regime but a
Region: A Pro-US, Democratic Area Is a Goal that Has Israeli and
Neo-Conservative Roots.'
Pro-Israel forces have long been interested in getting the US military more
directly involved in the Middle East. But they had limited success during
the Cold War, because America acted as an 'off-shore balancer' in the
region. Most forces designated for the Middle East, like the Rapid
Deployment Force, were kept 'over the horizon' and out of harm's way. The
idea was to play local powers off against each other - which is why the
Reagan administration supported Saddam against revolutionary Iran during the
Iran-Iraq War - in order to maintain a balance favourable to the US.
This policy changed after the first Gulf War, when the Clinton
administration adopted a strategy of 'dual containment'. Substantial US
forces would be stationed in the region in order to contain both Iran and
Iraq, instead of one being used to check the other. The father of dual
containment was none other than Martin Indyk, who first outlined the
strategy in May 1993 at WINEP and then implemented it as director for Near
East and South Asian Affairs at the National Security Council.
By the mid-1990s there was considerable dissatisfaction with dual
containment, because it made the United States the mortal enemy of two
countries that hated each other, and forced Washington to bear the burden of
containing both. But it was a strategy the Lobby favoured and worked
actively in Congress to preserve. Pressed by AIPAC and other pro-Israel
forces, Clinton toughened up the policy in the spring of 1995 by imposing an
economic embargo on Iran. But AIPAC and the others wanted more. The result
was the 1996 Iran and Libya Sanctions Act, which imposed sanctions on any
foreign companies investing more than $40 million to develop petroleum
resources in Iran or Libya. As Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of
Ha'aretz, noted at the time, 'Israel is but a tiny element in the big
scheme, but one should not conclude that it cannot influence those within
the Beltway.'
By the late 1990s, however, the neo-conservatives were arguing that dual
containment was not enough and that regime change in Iraq was essential. By
toppling Saddam and turning Iraq into a vibrant democracy, they argued, the
US would trigger a far-reaching process of change throughout the Middle
East. The same line of thinking was evident in the 'Clean Break' study the
neo-conservatives wrote for Netanyahu. By 2002, when an invasion of Iraq was
on the front-burner, regional transformation was an article of faith in
neo-conservative circles.
Charles Krauthammer describes this grand scheme as the brainchild of Natan
Sharansky, but Israelis across the political spectrum believed that toppling
Saddam would alter the Middle East to Israel's advantage. Aluf Benn reported
in Ha'aretz (17 February 2003):
Senior IDF officers and those close to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, such as
National Security Adviser Ephraim Halevy, paint a rosy picture of the
wonderful future Israel can expect after the war. They envision a domino
effect, with the fall of Saddam Hussein followed by that of Israel's other
enemies . . . Along with these leaders will disappear terror and weapons of
mass destruction.
Once Baghdad fell in mid-April 2003, Sharon and his lieutenants began urging
Washington to target Damascus. On 16 April, Sharon, interviewed in Yedioth
Ahronoth, called for the United States to put 'very heavy' pressure on
Syria, while Shaul Mofaz, his defence minister, interviewed in Ma'ariv,
said: 'We have a long list of issues that we are thinking of demanding of
the Syrians and it is appropriate that it should be done through the
Americans.' Ephraim Halevy told a WINEP audience that it was now important
for the US to get rough with Syria, and the Washington Post reported that
Israel was 'fuelling the campaign' against Syria by feeding the US
intelligence reports about the actions of Bashar Assad, the Syrian
president.
Prominent members of the Lobby made the same arguments. Wolfowitz declared
that 'there has got to be regime change in Syria,' and Richard Perle told a
journalist that 'a short message, a two-worded message' could be delivered
to other hostile regimes in the Middle East: 'You're next.' In early April,
WINEP released a bipartisan report stating that Syria 'should not miss the
message that countries that pursue Saddam's reckless, irresponsible and
defiant behaviour could end up sharing his fate'. On 15 April, Yossi Klein
Halevi wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times entitled 'Next, Turn the
Screws on Syria', while the following day Zev Chafets wrote an article for
the New York Daily News entitled 'Terror-Friendly Syria Needs a Change,
Too'.
Not to be outdone, Lawrence Kaplan wrote in the New Republic on 21 April
that Assad was a serious threat to America.
Back on Capitol Hill, Congressman Eliot Engel had reintroduced the Syria
Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act. It threatened
sanctions against Syria if it did not withdraw from Lebanon, give up its WMD
and stop supporting terrorism, and it also called for Syria and Lebanon to
take concrete steps to make peace with Israel. This legislation was strongly
endorsed by the Lobby - by AIPAC especially - and 'framed', according to the
Jewish Telegraph Agency, 'by some of Israel's best friends in Congress'. The
Bush administration had little enthusiasm for it, but the anti-Syrian act
passed overwhelmingly (398 to 4 in the House; 89 to 4 in the Senate), and
Bush signed it into law on 12 December 2003.
The administration itself was still divided about the wisdom of targeting
Syria. Although the neo-conservatives were eager to pick a fight with
Damascus, the CIA and the State Department were opposed to the idea. And
even after Bush signed the new law, he emphasised that he would go slowly in
implementing it. His ambivalence is understandable. First, the Syrian
government had not only been providing important intelligence about al-Qaida
since 9/11: it had also warned Washington about a planned terrorist attack
in the Gulf and given CIA interrogators access to Mohammed Zammar, the
alleged recruiter of some of the 9/11 hijackers. Targeting the Assad regime
would jeopardise these valuable connections, and thereby undermine the
larger war on terrorism.
Second, Syria had not been on bad terms with Washington before the Iraq war
(it had even voted for UN Resolution 1441), and was itself no threat to the
United States. Playing hardball with it would make the US look like a bully
with an insatiable appetite for beating up Arab states. Third, putting Syria
on the hit list would give Damascus a powerful incentive to cause trouble in
Iraq. Even if one wanted to bring pressure to bear, it made good sense to
finish the job in Iraq first. Yet Congress insisted on putting the screws on
Damascus, largely in response to pressure from Israeli officials and groups
like AIPAC. If there were no Lobby, there would have been no Syria
Accountability Act, and US policy towards Damascus would have been more in
line with the national interest.
Israelis tend to describe every threat in the starkest terms, but Iran is
widely seen as their most dangerous enemy because it is the most likely to
acquire nuclear weapons. Virtually all Israelis regard an Islamic country in
the Middle East with nuclear weapons as a threat to their existence. 'Iraq
is a problem . . . But you should understand, if you ask me, today Iran is
more dangerous than Iraq,' the defence minister, Binyamin Ben-Eliezer,
remarked a month before the Iraq war.
Sharon began pushing the US to confront Iran in November 2002, in an
interview in the Times. Describing Iran as the 'centre of world terror', and
bent on acquiring nuclear weapons, he declared that the Bush administration
should put the strong arm on Iran 'the day after' it conquered Iraq. In late
April 2003, Ha'aretz reported that the Israeli ambassador in Washington was
calling for regime change in Iran. The overthrow of Saddam, he noted, was
'not enough'. In his words, America 'has to follow through. We still have
great threats of that magnitude coming from Syria, coming from Iran.'
The neo-conservatives, too, lost no time in making the case for regime
change in Tehran. On 6 May, the AEI co-sponsored an all-day conference on
Iran with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and the Hudson
Institute, both champions of Israel. The speakers were all strongly
pro-Israel, and many called for the US to replace the Iranian regime with a
democracy. As usual, a bevy of articles by prominent neo-conservatives made
the case for going after Iran. 'The liberation of Iraq was the first great
battle for the future of the Middle East . . . But the next great battle -
not, we hope, a military battle - will be for Iran,' William Kristol wrote
in the Weekly Standard on 12 May.
The administration has responded to the Lobby's pressure by working overtime
to shut down Iran's nuclear programme. But Washington has had little
success, and Iran seems determined to create a nuclear arsenal. As a result,
the Lobby has intensified its pressure. Op-eds and other articles now warn
of imminent dangers from a nuclear Iran, caution against any appeasement of
a 'terrorist' regime, and hint darkly of preventive action should diplomacy
fail. The Lobby is pushing Congress to approve the Iran Freedom Support Act,
which would expand existing sanctions. Israeli officials also warn they may
take pre-emptive action should Iran continue down the nuclear road, threats
partly intended to keep Washington's attention on the issue.
One might argue that Israel and the Lobby have not had much influence on
policy towards Iran, because the US has its own reasons for keeping Iran
from going nuclear. There is some truth in this, but Iran's nuclear
ambitions do not pose a direct threat to the US. If Washington could live
with a nuclear Soviet Union, a nuclear China or even a nuclear North Korea,
it can live with a nuclear Iran. And that is why the Lobby must keep up
constant pressure on politicians to confront Tehran. Iran and the US would
hardly be allies if the Lobby did not exist, but US policy would be more
temperate and preventive war would not be a serious option.
It is not surprising that Israel and its American supporters want the US to
deal with any and all threats to Israel's security. If their efforts to
shape US policy succeed, Israel's enemies will be weakened or overthrown,
Israel will get a free hand with the Palestinians, and the US will do most
of the fighting, dying, rebuilding and paying. But even if the US fails to
transform the Middle East and finds itself in conflict with an increasingly
radicalised Arab and Islamic world, Israel will end up protected by the
world's only superpower. This is not a perfect outcome from the Lobby's
point of view, but it is obviously preferable to Washington distancing
itself, or using its leverage to force Israel to make peace with the
Palestinians.
Can the Lobby's power be curtailed? One would like to think so, given the
Iraq debacle, the obvious need to rebuild America's image in the Arab and
Islamic world, and the recent revelations about AIPAC officials passing US
government secrets to Israel. One might also think that Arafat's death and
the election of the more moderate Mahmoud Abbas would cause Washington to
press vigorously and even-handedly for a peace agreement. In short, there
are ample grounds for leaders to distance themselves from the Lobby and
adopt a Middle East policy more consistent with broader US interests. In
particular, using American power to achieve a just peace between Israel and
the Palestinians would help advance the cause of democracy in the region.
But that is not going to happen - not soon anyway. AIPAC and its allies
(including Christian Zionists) have no serious opponents in the lobbying
world. They know it has become more difficult to make Israel's case today,
and they are responding by taking on staff and expanding their activities.
Besides, American politicians remain acutely sensitive to campaign
contributions and other forms of political pressure, and major media outlets
are likely to remain sympathetic to Israel no matter what it does.
The Lobby's influence causes trouble on several fronts. It increases the
terrorist danger that all states face - including America's European allies.
It has made it impossible to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a
situation that gives extremists a powerful recruiting tool, increases the
pool of potential terrorists and sympathisers, and contributes to Islamic
radicalism in Europe and Asia.
Equally worrying, the Lobby's campaign for regime change in Iran and Syria
could lead the US to attack those countries, with potentially disastrous
effects. We don't need another Iraq. At a minimum, the Lobby's hostility
towards Syria and Iran makes it almost impossible for Washington to enlist
them in the struggle against al-Qaida and the Iraqi insurgency, where their
help is badly needed.
There is a moral dimension here as well. Thanks to the Lobby, the United
States has become the de facto enabler of Israeli expansion in the Occupied
Territories, making it complicit in the crimes perpetrated against the
Palestinians. This situation undercuts Washington's efforts to promote
democracy abroad and makes it look hypocritical when it presses other states
to respect human rights. US efforts to limit nuclear proliferation appear
equally hypocritical given its willingness to accept Israel's nuclear
arsenal, which only encourages Iran and others to seek a similar capability.
Besides, the Lobby's campaign to quash debate about Israel is unhealthy for
democracy. Silencing sceptics by organising blacklists and boycotts - or by
suggesting that critics are anti-semites - violates the principle of open
debate on which democracy depends. The inability of Congress to conduct a
genuine debate on these important issues paralyses the entire process of
democratic deliberation. Israel's backers should be free to make their case
and to challenge those who disagree with them, but efforts to stifle debate
by intimidation must be roundly condemned.
Finally, the Lobby's influence has been bad for Israel. Its ability to
persuade Washington to support an expansionist agenda has discouraged Israel
from seizing opportunities - including a peace treaty with Syria and a
prompt and full implementation of the Oslo Accords - that would have saved
Israeli lives and shrunk the ranks of Palestinian extremists. Denying the
Palestinians their legitimate political rights certainly has not made Israel
more secure, and the long campaign to kill or marginalise a generation of
Palestinian leaders has empowered extremist groups like Hamas, and reduced
the number of Palestinian leaders who would be willing to accept a fair
settlement and able to make it work. Israel itself would probably be better
off if the Lobby were less powerful and US policy more even-handed.
There is a ray of hope, however. Although the Lobby remains a powerful
force, the adverse effects of its influence are increasingly difficult to
hide. Powerful states can maintain flawed policies for quite some time, but
reality cannot be ignored for ever. What is needed is a candid discussion of
the Lobby's influence and a more open debate about US interests in this
vital region. Israel's well-being is one of those interests, but its
continued occupation of the West Bank and its broader regional agenda are
not. Open debate will expose the limits of the strategic and moral case for
one-sided US support and could move the US to a position more consistent
with its own national interest, with the interests of the other states in
the region, and with Israel's long-term interests as well.
10 March
Footnotes
An unedited version of this article is available at
http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011, or at
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=891198.



http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10891

Israel's Choice: "Jewish Only" or Democracy


By Sonja Karkar

28 April, 2007


The Electronic Intifada

The time will have to come for Israel to declare its hand: is it "a
state of the Jewish people throughout the world" as it defines itself,
or a state of all its citizens, both Jewish and non-Jewish? So far
Israel has managed to convince the Western world that it is the only
democracy in the region, but neglects to add that this democracy works
only for its Jewish citizens. This is the conundrum: Israel has been
unable to reconcile what it says it is, with want it wants to be --
democratic and exclusively Jewish.

All of Israel's one million plus Palestinian residents -- the
survivors and descendants of the 1948 Zionist ethnic cleansing of
Palestine -- have long felt discriminated against, despite Israel
paying lip-service to their democratic rights. They also felt on the
sidelines of what was being played out in the Occupied Palestinian
Territories, that is until Azmi Bishara, the outspoken political
leader of the National Democratic Assembly (NDA) or Balad in Israel
and a Knesset member, began campaigning for the collective rights of
Palestinians. His vision is not just for change inside Israel, but
involves an all-inclusive civil rights struggle against political
Zionism -- the racist and colonialist policies that have dispossessed,
marginalised and oppressed all Palestinians for almost 60 years. This
is what Israel is at pains to put down by any means. It cannot afford
to have someone like Azmi Bishara rallying people to his way of
thinking. Now, after many attempts to muzzle him, Israel has finally
succeeded in getting him to resign from the Knesset and to stay out of
the country.

A list of unpublished charges were drawn up against Bishara whilst he
was abroad -- charges so serious that they would likely have landed
him in jail on his return. While the charges themselves are not known,
it is not difficult to guess at what they involve. Bishara has been
previously charged with undermining the "Jewish nature of the state",
but the charges have always been dropped. This time it seems that
Israel's state security services may have formulated charges that not
only label Bishara a national security threat, but accuse him of
treason and espionage. The media is not allowed to discuss any of it
and even Bishara himself is reticent on the matter, no doubt to
protect himself from being further arraigned because he is adamant
that he will eventually return to Israel.

Effectively, Bishara and the NDA skated on thin ice legally whenever
they called for full and complete equality between Jews and
Palestinians in a state for all its citizens. Israel's Basic Law stops
people from participating in elections if any party platform implies
the "denial of the existence of the state of Israel as the state of
Jewish people". Only recently, Israel's Shin Bet (secret police) let
it be known that it would "disrupt the activities of any groups that
seek to change the Jewish or democratic character of Israel, even if
they use legal means." However, Bishara's intention was not to create
a fifth column inside Israel. He was in favour of exercising his and
his movement's democratic civil rights to demand that Israel treat all
its citizens equally and recognise its Palestinian citizens as a
national minority in their own homeland. The latter demand, of course,
is enormously contentious because that would require Israel to
acknowledge the falsity of its own historical narrative of exclusive
rights to a land it claimed was without people. From that would follow
that the indigenous Palestinians were, and still are being,
systematically uprooted to make way for an exclusively Jewish
democratic state in all of the land.

The discourse has been taken up in the Palestinian public arena and
now Israel is beginning to feel the same stirrings that finally
exposed Apartheid South Africa for the racist state it was. It knows
that sooner or later it will be forced to commit to being a "Jewish
state only" or recognise the Palestinians as equal citizens and a
national minority in their own land. Already Palestinian intellectuals
have drafted a document called The Democratic Constitution which
envisages Israel as a multicultural democracy for the people living
and born there. Whatever Azmi Bishara does now in exile, the seed has
burst: he has inspired a subjugated people to seek again their
liberation. What is surprising is that Israel has taken so long to
understand the lessons of history -- that no one person or state no
matter how powerful can oppress a people forever. However, Israel
still has the option to switch course and institute democracy for all,
and if genuinely undertaken, this may well be the solution worth
working towards for both peoples.

Sonja Karkar is the founder and President of Women for Palestine in
Melbourne, Australia.

-- -- -- --
http://www.countercurrents.org


Buying the Emek
Dr. Arthur Ruppin
The New Palestine
New York, May 1929

The acquisition of the Emek Yizael for Jewish colonization has been
the object of Jewish efforts for many years. It was natural that this
region, the largest fertile plain of Palestine, should have aroused
the interest of the Jewish colonization societies at the very
beginning. When the pogroms of 1890 caused large numbers of Jews to
emigrate from Russia, some of them turned to Palestine. As a result
there arose, in the larger Russian cities, Jewish societies whose aim
was the acquisition of land in Palestine for purposes of colonization.
These societies had connections with the Odessa Committee of the
'Hovevei Zion, which accordingly commissioned its Jaffa office to buy
suitable land in Palestine for these societies. The directors of this
office, Tiomkin, Pines and Bentovim, conceived the plan of purchasing
a considerable part of the Emek Yizael and of the Plain of Acco. It
was not only the fertility of these plains that attracted the, but
also the fact that these were the only regions where it was possible
to purchase a large stretch of land from a single owner, while the
remainder of Palestine was broken up into small parcels belonging to
many individuals, so that the acquisition of a considerable continuous
expanse was exceedingly difficult.

In order to execute this plan the Jaffa office communicated with
Messrs. Kalvariski and Joshua Hankin. The latter, then a young man of
twenty-five had already demonstrated his skill in such negotiations in
the acquisition of land for the colonies Rehoboth and Hederah. By
energetic work he succeeded, in 1891, in reaching an agreement with
large owners in the Emek Jezreel and the Plain of Acco for the
purchase of 160,000 dunams at 15 francs per dunam. These 160,000
dunams included the territory which came into the possession of the
Haifa Bay Development Company a few years ago, and, lately, of the
Jewish National Fund. Hankin had not found it easy to reach this
agreement to a low price, for even then speculators of all kinds were
surrounding the land owners and attempting to frustrate his efforts by
offering a higher price. But Hankin enjoyed the confidence of the
Arabs, so that he succeeded in overcoming the competition of the
speculators. Before the consummation of the agreement, however the
Turkish Government, alarmed by the increasing inflow of Russian Jews,
prohibited Jewish immigration entirely. This blow proved disastrous
for the negotiations. The Russian societies formed for the purposes of
purchasing land were dissolved, failed to send in the money they had
promised, and the entire magnificent project fell through.

Two decades passed before another attempt was made to acquire the Emek
Yizrael (The valley of Jezreel). It was only in 1910 that Hankin --
who, in the meanwhile, had purchased land in Lower Galilee for the ICA
-- resumed his negotiations for land in the Emek. Authorized by a
Russian Jew, Elias Blumenfeld, to arrange for the purchase of 1,000
dunams on which he, Blumenfeld, intended to establish a farm with his
own means, Hankin concluded an agreement for a stretch of 9,500 dunams
in Fule, later Merchavia [Al-Ful in Arabic]. He hoped that the ICA, in
whose employ he was at that time, would buy the remainder of the land.
When, however, the ICA refused to do so, he inquired of me, who was
then the director of the Palestine Bureau of the Zionist Organization,
whether the Zionists would be prepared to purchase this land. Even
before that it had occurred to me, whenever, going from Haifa to
Nazareth, I had viewed the broad expanse of the Emek Yizrael, that,
because of its proximity to Haifa, its excellent railroad and highway
connections, and the ease with which its soil could be cultivated,
this land would be preeminently suited for Jewish colonization.

But it was no simple matter to obtain the money for this purchase.
Only the fact that Franz Oppenheimer was just then seeking land for
the co-operative colonization society he had recently organized, and
the simultaneous appearance of some private purchasers. made it
possible to carry through this project. 3,500 dunams were taken over
by the National Fund for the co-operative colonies, and the rest by
the Palestine Land Development Company.

This, however, did not mean that the transaction was consummated, for
the Turkish Government refused to authorized the sale, even though
official permission was applied for not by the National Fund, nor by
the Palestine Land Development Company, but by a Jew, Efraim Krause,
who was a Turkish citizen. The Governor in Nazareth, a rabid anti-
Zionist, declared that he would fight this purchase to the utmost;
furthermore, he ignored the orders of his superior, the District
Governor in Acco, who wished no difficulties put in the way of this
transaction. We were forced, therefore, to appeal to the Vali, the
Governor General in Beirut. Great haste was necessary, for the
purchase was beginning to attract attention, and influential circles
were doing their best to nullify it.

I still remember how, in February, 1910, Hankin and I rode on
horseback (for the roads were unfit for carriages) from Haifa to
Beirut, through a fearful rainstorm that prevented any ships from
plying between the two cities; it was midnight when we reached Sidon,
so that we arrived in Beirut only on the second day. But although we
remained there for two weeks, and although official permission for the
purchase was promised us from day to day, we were, finally, obliged to
leave Beirut without accomplishing our purpose. Only though the
efforts of Hankin and his friends in Constantinople did we at last
succeed in obtaining from the ministry the necessary sanction. This
meant the gaining of our first foothold in the Emek.; and before long
the Oppenheimer co-operative settlement and some private colonists
commenced their agricultural work there.

About this time, too, the interest of the wealthier Russian Jews in
the purchase of Palestinian land was revived. After the acquisition of
Merhaviah, Hankin had gone over from the ICA to the Palestine Land
Development Company, which offered him the opportunity to exercise his
abilities to the fullest extent. He neglected no occasion for the
increase of our land holdings in Palestine, and, in 1913, commenced
negotiations for a stretch of 20,000 dunam in Meshach, adjoining
Merhaviah, reaching a provisional agreement for a price of about forty
francs per dunam.

On a visit to Russia, and by correspondence, I endeavored to find
buyers for this land; the Odessa Committee, too, made efforts in this
direction. With the assistance of the late engineer Nachum Syrkin of
Kiev the interest of the wealthy sugar manufacturer Brodski was
aroused in this land, where he expected to attempt the cultivation of
sugar beets. Accordingly Brodski commissioned us to buy the land. But
he had hardly declared himself willing to purchase it when Baron
Rothschild also decided that he wanted it. There was no doubt that
Brodski would have to cede to the Baron. I therefore telegraphed to
Brodski -- it was late in July, 1914, asking him to let Baron
Rothschild purchase the land; he immediately telegraphed his assent
from a German bathing resort. This was approximately the time of the
outbreak of the war, so that Brodski manifestly was no longer in a
position to forward the purchase money. Baron Rothschild, on the other
hand, sent half a million francs to Palestine for the land. As the war
had already broken out it was, of course, impossible to use this money
for the purchase of the land; but it was the last contribution
received by the ICA during the war, and proved of inestimable value
for the continuation of its work.

During the war, and for two years after, land purchases were
prohibited by law. It was only after the establishment of the civilian
government under Herbert Samuel, in 1920, that they were permitted
again. Hankin immediately grasped the opportunity to conclude a
provisional agreement for 70,000 dunam. Half of this land (Nahalal,
Djindjar and Nasra) was not irrigated, and cost £3 per dunam, while
the other half (Nuris) was partly irrigated, and therefore sold at the
higher price of six and a half pounds sterling. The entire amount was
about £300,000, which was to be paid upon transfer of the deed. But
when Hankin submitted this agreement to me I was forced to point out
that the financial situation of the Zionist Organization and its
institution precluded any purchase of this sort. Hankin, however,
repeatedly emphasized the importance of the transaction, and I
realized that this represented our first opportunity to commence
extensive colonization on a stretch of land larger than any which had
ever been placed at our disposal.

But I saw no way of raising the huge sum required. We discussed the
matter at length, and apparently without result, until I finally told
Hankin that I would try to persuade the Jewish National Fund to buy
the land, provided it would be possible to pay the purchase price in
ten annual installments. This suggestion appeared almost Utopian at
that time, for the Arabs were willing to sell their land only because
they wanted to have the cash immediately, and had never agreed to
accept payment on an installment basis. Hankin, too, seriously doubted
the possibility of carrying through this plan; nonetheless he did
attempt it, and actually succeed in obtaining from the owners an
option according to which they were to be paid not in ten, but in six
yearly installments.

The Committee which then represented the Jewish National Fund in
Palestine, consisting of Messrs. Ussishkin and Ettinger and myself,
ratified this agreement in principle, and submitted it to the European
governing board of the National Fund for approval. Here, however, the
purchase met with keen opposition. The Reorganization Commission,
which came to Palestine just then, declared itself against it; and the
Director of the National Fund vetoed it. The Purchase would probably
have fallen through had not the Zionist Executive intervened and, with
the deciding vote of Dr. Weizmann, declared itself in favor of it.
Thus, and despite many other difficulties, the purchase was finally
made, rendering possible the establishment of a considerable number of
new colonies in the Emek (Nahalal, Djindjar, Kfar Yeheskel, Geva, Ein
'Harod, Tel Yosef, Beth Alpha).

In the next few years Hankin succeeded in acquiring further large
expanses in the Emek Yizrael for the National Fund, the Palestine
Land Development Company, and the American Zion Commonwealth. In
addition he bought, in 1924, 60,000 dunams in the Plain of Acco, of
which 46,000 dunams lay on the coast between Haifa and Acco. One
fourth of this was taken over by the National Fund, and the remaining
three-fourths by the Palestine Land Development Company, which later
sold this land to the Haifa Bay Development Company, founded by the
American Zion Commonwealth together with and at the initiative of
Joseph L?wy. Then, in 1928, the major portion of the Haifa Bay
Development Company's land came into the possession of the Jewish
National Fund. The acquisition of this land is, therefore, of
unusually great importance, for it assures the Jewish National Fund of
a lasting influence upon the development of Haifa.

Thus there have been acquired, since 1910, approximately 225,000
dunams in the Emek Yizrael and about 65,000 dunams in the Plain of
Acco -- a total of 290,000 dunams, purchased at the price of £970,000.

It has often been asked why the Zionist Organization has chosen the
Emek for settlement purposes, and has neglected the coastal plain,
which is suitable for plantations of all sorts and for orange groves
in particular. This question can best be answered by pointing out that
the coastal plain has not been neglected at all. Since 1910 the
Palestine Land Development Company alone has acquired 70,000 dunam in
the coastal plain between Gaza and Haifa; and when we count the plain
of Acco the total mounts to 135,000 dunams. This notwithstanding the
Zionist public has heard much more of the purchases in the Emek
Yizrael than of those in the coastal plain -- largely because it was
possible to buy large stretches of land at once in the Emek, while in
the coastal plain only small parcels of a few hundred or a few
thousand dunams could be bought at one time.

In addition to the above purchases on the part of the Palestine Land
Development Company in the coastal plain we must also mention the
60,000 or 70,000 dunams near Binyamina which were partly bought by the
ICA, and partly leased by it from the government on long-term leases.
A few small parcels of land in the coastal plain have also been
purchased by some private individuals and companies. When we consider
also about 50,000 dunams for the purchase of which negotiations were
begun several years ago by the Palestine Land Development Company,
acting on behalf of the Jewish National Fund, and other companies, we
see that approximately 250,000 dunams of land in the coastal plain
(Including the Plain of Acco) have become Jewish property -- i.e.,
even more than in the Emek Yizrael.

It is, of course, true that in the first few years after the world war
the Zionist Organization concentrated its colonization efforts upon
the Emek; for only here could it hope to acquire, in a short time,
extensive stretches of land for colonization on a large scale.
Transactions corresponding to those which were completed in the Emek
within a few months required many years where the coastal plain was
concerned. But at that time it was absolutely necessary, in the
interests of the entire Zionist movement, to begin colonization
immediately, and not to postpone it for years. Furthermore, in the
coastal region colonization must be based principally upon the
cultivation of oranges; and orange plantations yield no profit for six
years. Under uncertain financial conditions prevailing in the Zionist
Organization in 1920 and 1921 such colonization in the coastal plain
would have been attended by a great risk, for the living and working
expenses of the settlers would have had to be drawn from the Zionist
funds for at least six years. And at that time, when the Keren Hayesod
was in its infancy, it was quite impossible to take over such an
obligation for six years. It was necessary to find a form of
colonization in which the settlers would be able to become self-
supporting as soon as possible; and here general agriculture,. with
dairying as its most important branch, afforded the best opportunity.

None of the settlers of 1921 had the means to start orange plantations
on their own account. For this was during the European inflation
period, when the sum required for a Palestinian orange plantation
amounted to millions and billions in European currency. Besides,
orange growing was not very popular then. This branch of agriculture
had been very unprofitable during the war and even in 1921 it was
impossible to find a Jewish purchaser for one of the finest and best
situated orange plantations in Palestine (although it was offered at
an exceedingly low price), so that it had to be sold to an Arab.

Thus we may say that the Zionist Organization concentrated its land-
purchasing efforts upon the two great plains of Palestine almost
simultaneously. It is only in the mountainous country adjoining these
plains that, recognizing the greater difficulties of colonization in
the mountains, it bought nothing. One therefore receives a curious
impression when one reads, in the report of the Jewish Agency Experts
Commission, a detailed attack upon the Zionist ?mountain colonies.?
The colonies meant are Ataroth (Kalendie) and Kiriath Anavim, near
Jerusalem. But these should be considered suburban rather than
mountain colonies, for their very existence is due to the immediate
proximity of the Jerusalem market. This proximity enables them to
command such excellent prices for their milk, eggs, vegetables, and
fruit that their financial situation is eminently satisfactory, and
much better than that of many colonies in the plain.

When we look back upon the history of our acquisition of Palestinian
land, we see clearly that the purchase of land in the Emek has been a
deciding factor in the Jewish work in Palestine. This has been the
first time that Jews have come to constitute the majority of the
agricultural population of a considerable area, and that they have
been able to establish themselves in the manner best adapted to their
special requirements. The construction of the Port of Haifa and the
growth of the city will bring out the significance of the Emek even
more clearly. Next to the industrial development due to Nesher, Shemen
and Grands Moulins, it is Jewish colonization in the Emek to which we
must credit the increase of the Jewish population of Haifa from three
thousand to fifteen thousand since the war, and the fact that the
strong Jewish influence upon the city itself is evident to even the
most casual observer.
- www.zionism-israel.com/Arthur_Ruppin_1929.htm

Deborah
Judge says "ample cause to believe" AIPAC pair were foreign agents
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=57878
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=58567
Ø
Ø
http://www.predatoryaliens.com
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org
http://www.daylaborers.org
http://www.newnation.com/index2.html
"The Illegal-Alien Crime Wave" by Heather Mac Donald
http://www.city-journal.org/html/14_1_the_illegal_alien.html
http://idexer.com
www.AmericanPatrol.com
www.SaveOurState.org


Outlook Express could not post your message. Subject 'Re: When I see 105
dancing screaming Alibabas in the streets all bouncing up and down at the
same time, all I want to know is one thing ...', Account: 'news', Server:
'news.bigpond.com', Protocol: NNTP, Server Response: '441 Posting Failed
("From" Header not in Internet Syntax.)', Port: 119, Secure(SSL): No, Server
Error: 441, Error Number: 0x800CCCA9

Outlook Express could not post your message. Subject 'Re: When I see 105
dancing screaming Alibabas in the streets all bouncing up and down at the
same time, all I want to know is one thing ...', Account: 'news', Server:
'news.bigpond.com', Protocol: NNTP, Server Response: '441 Posting Failed
("From" Header not in Internet Syntax.)', Port: 119, Secure(SSL): No, Server
Error: 441, Error Number: 0x800CCCA9



YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
Post by M_Elias
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was. We need to do this now,
while the USA is at war amongst those that openly deny the holocaust,
the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11 and the same people that
seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people. We can not give up
especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by those that hate us. We
have to keep trying. We have to be the true peacemakers and fight those
that seek to destroy us and our way of life and our enemies morals will
become our morals and our love of God will be diminished if we don't
stand up and make a shout to heaven in every country we occupy so that
our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust to be remembered as the
most wicked and violent period in modern day history so that our enemies
are not granted permission to repeat the wicked deeds of those that
justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000
plus Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis? The holocaust is
not a subject that persons are given an option to believe or not
believe. The holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention
of the automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear
weapons. How do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of
the USA denied using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with
access to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were
no crimes committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination
is not a crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are
responsible for. The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person
that commits the crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death
sentence for the murders they commit during the here and now or the past
and when they commit them in the future. We can't be lenient on those
that seek to murder or bring about the death of any Jew or any person
that teaches the truth about the holocaust anywhere on earth.
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show host
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for
those that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it.
American Nazi extremist murdered him in cold blood. According to the
media they drove by and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in
fact the Nazis that murdered him were and still are and always will be
dangerous to themselves and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute
and antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe
Rabbenu as the divine undeniable law of the land.
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and
doctorates the persecution of the Jews is history and there is
historical documentation about every nation that has persecuted the Jews
that said such nation has been conquered by a foreign army or the
government that was opposed to persecution of the Jews.
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I
can say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing
what one wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be
that person correct or incorrect.
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to
kill those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel
preferable in a war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with
plenty of Jews as my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder,
manslaughter, or and type of illegal killing.
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of
Bar or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless
Hashem spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem
told me to kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I
would not be like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the
seed of Amalek.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Murder is Murder.....PERIOD!!! Violence DOESNT solve problems, only
makes it worse. Pray for your enemies! Pray for them to repent before
its too late!
I'm praying that the next time I'm home on Eretz Israel, as in times past
Hashem delivers my enemies
to me so that I may slay them in war. Killing ones enemies in war is not
murder. I do pray that sinners repent
and those sinners that are my enemies I pray that God makes me victorious
over so that they
perish rather than myself, family and friends.
A wonderful policy for Americans, particularly for those who are 98%
of the population and who fight 99.999999% of America's wars. Yes,
Elias, Americans. We're the key to this mess, this existential
catastrophe which is still escalating exponentially, and 98% of us are
not Jewish. Listen up, damn it! Who do you think you are? If you want
Israel to take on the entire Muslim world single-handedly in the
nuclear age with New York City as the first target, well I guess
that's part of the sovereignty principle--unless you're an American.
But don't expect our children and grandchildren to fight these stupid
wars for you. Start doing laps, get a prophylactic angioplasty, grease
up your uzi and do it yourself. My granddaughter, for example, has
declared that this time around she's not going to do it for you.
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Would that you knew how right you are.
PS: Please, Woody, weigh in here. Ask your friends to shake off the
fear and to speak up. We saw Scoop last night and I know damned well
that not one of those friends of yours is an Abe Foxman type. In fact
you spoke up in a cinematic patter with Scarlett. How about doing it
again, this time really in public without ambiguity, without it
looking like mere tinsel town froth. We need you , Woody.
Cazador
2007-04-26 20:21:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.


The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.


The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons. How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".


The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.


According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
Geno1234
2007-04-26 20:41:31 UTC
Permalink
Boy you all is full of zionazi shit.
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons.
How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show
hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
M_Elias
2007-04-27 01:43:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Geno1234
Boy you all is full of zionazi shit.
You need to take your dago propaganda and shove it up the Popes ass.
The day of Roman rule is far gone. The Italians can't even get a dago in as
Pope.
They elected a Pollock misfit that was caught jacking-off twice and now they
elect
a Hun Nazi. In the end the dagos and Huns will perish.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 05:44:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Post by Geno1234
Boy you all is full of zionazi shit.
You need to take your dago propaganda and shove it up the Popes ass.
The day of Roman rule is far gone. The Italians can't even get a dago in
as Pope.
They elected a Pollock misfit that was caught jacking-off twice and now
they elect
a Hun Nazi. In the end the dagos and Huns will perish.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
As you more than ably prove, you ignorant prick.
Cazador
2007-04-28 02:47:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
You need to take your dago propaganda and shove it up the Popes ass.
The day of Roman rule is far gone. The Italians can't even get a dago in as
Pope.
They elected a Pollock misfit that was caught jacking-off twice and now they
elect
a Hun Nazi. In the end the dagos and Huns will perish.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Susan, Deborah, if you can't speak up against this
miscreant. . . . . .
sabbatai zevi
2007-04-26 21:30:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons. How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
M_Elias
2007-04-27 01:45:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by sabbatai zevi
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons.
How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show
hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about
the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Let's not kill all those who say the earth is flat but rather all those
below Eretz Israel. I wish Hashem would destroy every
goy in existence and leave the earth for the Jews to repopulate on.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 05:45:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Let's not kill all those who say the earth is flat but rather all those
below Eretz Israel.
That's "Ersatz" israel dopey. "Ersatz" as in phoney, fake. Got it? Good.
d***@gmail.com
2007-04-27 11:23:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by sabbatai zevi
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Who's ever in the mood? There are graver and far more pressing matters
than the Flat Earth Society. I speak of those who've relied on a false
presumption of entitlement and maintained it through intimidation for
so long that they're astounded it no longer works, although it was a
scam from the beginning. Our financial structure is in great danger.
Muslims have entered the nuclear age. Neocons are eating away at the
very fibre of our liberties. The stupidity of this is beyond
comprehension. I speak, of course, of those who put anchovies on
pizza. Pizza diversity has been used to cover and justify one of the
great crimes of the 20th Century, and now through our own weaknesses
we Americans have become complicit, branded in the eyes of the entire
world, for allowing achovies on pizza. The brazen advocates of
anchovies on pizza threaten all humanity, even, perhaps, the time-
space continuum itself.

They must be disposed of forthwith. Time is running out.

Deborah
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 11:57:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by sabbatai zevi
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Who's ever in the mood? There are graver and far more pressing matters
than the Flat Earth Society. I speak of those who've relied on a false
presumption of entitlement and maintained it through intimidation for
so long that they're astounded it no longer works,
About time you stinky yids woke up to the fact your intimidation and
b'ullsh'it is being seen for what it is.
Post by d***@gmail.com
although it was a
scam from the beginning. Our financial structure is in great danger.
Because the stupid Yanks continue going to war for the stinky yids. AND they
borrow money from the Chinese to be able to give gifts of >$5bn p.a. to the
stinky yids. This, despite the US having a debt of $10 trillion dollars, and
climbing.
Post by d***@gmail.com
Muslims have entered the nuclear age.
Been there for a while, slime. Nothing's come of it yet.
Post by d***@gmail.com
Neocons are eating away at the
very fibre of our liberties.
The neo-cons are infested with stinky yids, slime.

The remainder of your pathetic attempt at humour has been snipped to save
you further embarrassment, slime.
f***@verizon.net
2007-04-27 16:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by sabbatai zevi
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Who's ever in the mood? There are graver and far more pressing matters
than the Flat Earth Society.
I thought they'd made an official statement a few years ago
that "media gasses" had, indeed, infalted the earth into a
ball shape (I kid you not - "media gasses"!!!)

Susan
Post by d***@gmail.com
I speak of those who've relied on a false
presumption of entitlement and maintained it through intimidation for
so long that they're astounded it no longer works, although it was a
scam from the beginning. Our financial structure is in great danger.
Muslims have entered the nuclear age. Neocons are eating away at the
very fibre of our liberties. The stupidity of this is beyond
comprehension. I speak, of course, of those who put anchovies on
pizza. Pizza diversity has been used to cover and justify one of the
great crimes of the 20th Century, and now through our own weaknesses
we Americans have become complicit, branded in the eyes of the entire
world, for allowing achovies on pizza. The brazen advocates of
anchovies on pizza threaten all humanity, even, perhaps, the time-
space continuum itself.
They must be disposed of forthwith. Time is running out.
Deborah
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 22:53:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@verizon.net
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by sabbatai zevi
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Who's ever in the mood? There are graver and far more pressing matters
than the Flat Earth Society.
I thought they'd made an official statement a few years ago
that "media gasses" had, indeed, infalted the earth into a
ball shape (I kid you not - "media gasses"!!!)
What the fuck does "infalted" mean, you dyslexic, thick Irish cunt?
NefeshBarYochai
2007-04-27 23:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by sabbatai zevi
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Who's ever in the mood? There are graver and far more pressing matters
than the Flat Earth Society. I speak of those who've relied on a false
presumption of entitlement and maintained it through intimidation for
so long that they're astounded it no longer works, although it was a
scam from the beginning. Our financial structure is in great danger.
Muslims have entered the nuclear age. Neocons are eating away at the
very fibre of our liberties. The stupidity of this is beyond
comprehension. I speak, of course, of those who put anchovies on
pizza. Pizza diversity has been used to cover and justify one of the
great crimes of the 20th Century, and now through our own weaknesses
we Americans have become complicit, branded in the eyes of the entire
world, for allowing achovies on pizza. The brazen advocates of
anchovies on pizza threaten all humanity, even, perhaps, the time-
space continuum itself.
They must be disposed of forthwith. Time is running out.
Deborah
The school on Shammai does not condone fish and milk at the meal,
however Hillel and his student permit fish and milk at the same meal.
Also when serving Gefilte Fish & Chopped Liver are the same meal you
shoud serve the fish first and then allow at least 1/2 before
consuming the liver.
Cazador
2007-04-28 03:00:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by NefeshBarYochai
Post by d***@gmail.com
Post by sabbatai zevi
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
Who's ever in the mood? There are graver and far more pressing matters
than the Flat Earth Society. I speak of those who've relied on a false
presumption of entitlement and maintained it through intimidation for
so long that they're astounded it no longer works, although it was a
scam from the beginning. Our financial structure is in great danger.
Muslims have entered the nuclear age. Neocons are eating away at the
very fibre of our liberties. The stupidity of this is beyond
comprehension. I speak, of course, of those who put anchovies on
pizza. Pizza diversity has been used to cover and justify one of the
great crimes of the 20th Century, and now through our own weaknesses
we Americans have become complicit, branded in the eyes of the entire
world, for allowing achovies on pizza. The brazen advocates of
anchovies on pizza threaten all humanity, even, perhaps, the time-
space continuum itself.
They must be disposed of forthwith. Time is running out.
Deborah
The school on Shammai does not condone fish and milk at the meal,
however Hillel and his student permit fish and milk at the same meal.
Also when serving Gefilte Fish & Chopped Liver are the same meal you
shoud serve the fish first and then allow at least 1/2 before
consuming the liver.
You are chopped liver complete with all the associated filtrates.
Cazador
2007-04-28 02:11:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by sabbatai zevi
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons. How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthatspread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
lets kill those who say the earth is flat as well while we're in the
mood.
At this point mere fatigue might suggest that tens of millions of the
benighted will agree. All the King's men may well not put us back
together again. Where the Hell is Woody Allen? He spoke up in "Scoop",
why not here and now? Come on, Woody, just one sane word here where
the rest of us dwell?
M_Elias
2007-04-27 01:40:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons.
How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show
hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthat spread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
You need to run a hot poker up your Hun ass.
Cazador
2007-04-27 02:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons.
How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself. NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future. We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show
hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthatspread the truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it. American Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset. Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet. In every University that can issue degrees and doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country. I can
say what I want." It is a free country but in saying and writing what one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone. And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman. Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek. Then I would not be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
You need to run a hot poker up your Hun ass.
And you, sir, need to give some consideration to why it is that as an
American you are hostile to the U.S. Constitution. Most of us one time
or another have been sworn to support it.
NefeshBarYochai
2007-04-27 02:43:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
I'm upset with the amount of false propaganda that is being decimated
concerning the holocaust in the form of denial that it happened. I was
just thinking, if I were to deny that the blacks were ever slaves in the
USA I'm sure I might even end up like my beloved late friend Rabbi Meir
Kahane A"H, Admo"r, HY"D, N"E ZT"L.
So why are we allowing the scum of the earth to disseminate lies that
indicate the holocaust never happened? Have we forgotten how to fight
our enemies legally in the Galut.
That anyone in their right mind were to make statements on Eretz Israel
that the holocaust never happened there is a good chance that person
might feel an appropriate sock in the face.
If we allow those that hate us to spew their treachery not only to us
but to G-d almighty then we deserve to be treated as slaves with the
inability to protect our heritage and well being.
We need to collect our thoughts, channel our anger and do every thing in
our power to reduce the monetary worth and value of those that
disseminate the holohoax doctrine.
We need to communicate with each other and those that represent us as a
people before G-d, our country and government to squash the evil beings
that have no respect for the 6,000,000 plus Jews and non-Jews that
perished because of the Nazi doctrine of Adolf Hitler YM"SH,Y'Sh,Y"ShU
and in doing so we need to take control of the media and show every
vile, disgusting, truth that the holocaust was.
We need to do this now, while the USA is at war amongst those that
openly deny the holocaust, the same people that attacked the USA on 9/11
and the same people that seek to subjugate the Jewish people by force IF
WE LET THEM.
We need to start making lists of names of those that seek to cause us
suffering because we have the blessing of being part of a nation that is
Israel the seed of Avraham Avinu and a Jewish people.
We can not give up especially while the Temple Mount is occupied by
those that hate us. We have to keep trying. We have to be the true
peacemakers and fight those that seek to destroy us and our way of life
and our enemies morals will become our morals and our love of God will
be diminished if we don't stand up and make a shout to heaven in every
country we occupy so that our prayers and deeds will cause the holocaust
to be remembered as the most wicked and violent period in modern day
history so that our enemies are not granted permission to repeat the
wicked deeds of those that justified the murders of 6,000,000 plus Jews
then and now.
I set before the Jewish people a warning today. You must remember those
martyred in the holocaust and cause their memories to be engraved on the
souls of all those who wish to live in peace so mankind can seek
goodness and not the wickedness of the idolaters that murder and violate
our Decalogue simply because they feel like Royalty. There is only one
Royal King of the Universe and that is Hashem.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
A BIG AMEN to that!!! Leave out the part about "Killing" though.
Why should I not condone the killing of those that deny that 6,000,000 plus
Jews and non-Jews that were murdered by the Nazis?
Because only moral cripples promote murder. And democratic states do
not execute people for the ideas they hold.
The holocaust is not a
Post by M_Elias
subject that persons are given an option to believe or not believe.
Bullshit. All personal beliefs are privileged. There is no
alternative. Expressing them ought to be too but that's another
matter.
 The
Post by M_Elias
holocaust was a factual part of history, like the invention of the
automobile or the harnessing of the atom resulting in nuclear weapons.
How
do you think the Japanese would feel if the government of the USA denied
using nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Who knows?
Post by M_Elias
If the criminal element can succeed in convincing enough people with access
to the media that the holocaust didn't exist and that there were no crimes
committed by the Nazis and their doctrine for world domination is not a
crime the history could repeat itself.  NEVER AGAIN!
Sure, never again. I agree with that. But the methods you espouse are
abominable, Nazi at best.
Post by M_Elias
Today the Israeli government is actively perusing Nazi war criminals and
also seeking to retrieve any monetary profit those criminals are responsible
for.
Almost all of the Nazi war criminals are long since dead. You are
right, however, that the Israeli government and Jewish organizations
are extracting "monetary profit" by exploiting the Holocaust,
something which is not being done, at least not successfully, by the
Armenians, the Ukrainians, the Don Cossacks, the American Indian,
etc., etc. Read "The Holocaust Industry".
The way to legally kill Nazi criminals or any person that commits the
Post by M_Elias
crime of holocaust denial is by giving them the death sentence for the
murders they commit during the here and now or the past and when they commit
them in the future.  We can't be lenient on those that seek to murder or
bring about the death of any Jew or any person that teaches the truth about
the holocaust anywhere on earth.
You are terminally confused, a victim of the irrationality of
neozionism.
Post by M_Elias
Look at what happened to Allen Berg the Jewish radio talk show
hosthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bergthatspreadthe truth about the
holocaust vehemently on the radio with a well remembered hatred for those
that perpetrated the holocaust and those that justified it.  American
Nazi
extremist murdered him in cold blood.
So you conclude that murdering other people in cold blood is the
answer to the death of Allen Berg? No crime justifies another.
According to the media they drove by
Post by M_Elias
and gunned him down like a dangerous animal when in fact the Nazis that
murdered him were and still are and always will be dangerous to themselves
and others as long as they remain Nazis.
Nazism isn't a race of people but rather a mindset.  Those that deny the
holocaust need to repent and hear the truth and believe it or they will
suffer from the punishment that Hashem punishes all those that persecute and
antagonize the Jews or any person that accepts the Torah of Moshe Rabbenu as
the divine undeniable law of the land.
What?
Post by M_Elias
If you don't believe me and don't accept the Christian or Jewish Bible
(Tannach) then read the world history books used in the Universities all
over this planet.  In every University that can issue degrees and
doctorates
the persecution of the Jews is history and there is historical documentation
about every nation that has persecuted the Jews that said such nation has
been conquered by a foreign army or the government that was opposed to
persecution of the Jews.
The next step for you will no doubt the Foreign Ministership of
Israel.
Post by M_Elias
It's a popular phrase here in the USA to say, "It's a free country.  I
can
say what I want."  It is a free country but in saying and writing what
one
wants he or she many times becomes a target for murderers, be that person
correct or incorrect.
You are advocating murder as we speak.
Post by M_Elias
When I say I'd like to kill those that deny the holocaust I'd like to kill
those people, as a soldier of the Hagganah, on Eretz Israel preferable in a
war in a combat zone.  And I would like to kill them with plenty of Jews
as
my witnesses and not be prosecuted for murder, manslaughter, or and type of
illegal killing.
You want a free pass for killing Palestinians do you? Just like those
IDF guys who specialize in shooting thirteen year olds in the head.
Post by M_Elias
And what if the person that denies the holocaust is a child under age of Bar
or Bat Mitzvah or a woman.  Then I wouldn't like to kill them unless
Hashem
spoke to me from the Shekinah with Jewish witnesses and Hashem told me to
kill them all because they are of the seed of Amalek.  Then I would not
be
like King Saul but rather like King David and kill all the seed of Amalek.
Mein Gott in Himmel!
Post by M_Elias
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
Just so, and accordingly M. Elias doesn't either.
You need to run a hot poker up your Hun ass.
And you, sir, need to give some consideration to why it is that as an
American you are hostile to the U.S. Constitution. Most of us one time
or another have been sworn to support it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just because a person speaks the truth dose not make him hostile to
the constitution of the USA. It's a know fact that Hashem permitted
Satan to participate in the creation of all the goyim with the
acception of the Moshiach while all the seed of Abraham the Jews were
created by Hashem. The Moshiach will arise from the Goyim and even
though the Moshiach will or was (as he may be on earth today) raised
by Goyim he (the Moshiach) will choose the Jewish faith because
Moshiach is not of the seed of Satan. Those that wrote the new
testament knew this so in order to keep the goyim sane without a
conscious so they not worry about their sins those that wrote the New
Testament gave mankind the false hope that because Jesus was crucified
the goyim could sin and they would be forgiven and not punished. The
Jews know the truth though that every human being be they goy or Jew
will be punished for their sins. God will allow the goyim nations to
destroy each other because the goyim nations refused his Torah and
only the Jews accepted it. The immortality of the Jewish people is
their reward for accepting the Torah. The best place on earth to live
is on Eretz Israel because once a person arrives there he or she is
above the Goyim nations that will destroy each other in a nuclear
holocaust. The first time the earth was purified was during the days
of Noach and the Flood when Hashem caused it to rain forty days and
forty nights. The next time the earth will be purified with will be
by the fire of mankind’s own making in nuclear war. If I don’t make
it back to Eretz Israel before this nuclear holocaust begins I will
perish like everyone else, but if I am condemned to perish here in the
Galut I will perish with the hope in my heart the my soul makes the
Gigul (transmigration of the soul) to Eretz Israel or even better if I
perish here in the USA I hope my intelligence remains in existence as
a
מלאך טוב לעם ישראל ויהודים
Malach Tov for am Israel and the Jewish people.
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 05:46:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cazador
Post by M_Elias
You need to run a hot poker up your Hun ass.
And you, sir, need to give some consideration to why it is that as an
American you are hostile to the U.S. Constitution. Most of us one time
or another have been sworn to support it.
Seems we've got ourselves a live one here, Cazador.
Venceremos
2007-04-26 17:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust
NOBODY DENIOES THE FACT THAT JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100 MILLION
RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS, AND THAT JEWISH EXECUTIONERS STABBED THE CZAR
AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH THEIR EYES!

THAT IS WHAT I CALL A H O L O C A U S T !
Cazador
2007-04-26 20:27:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust
NOBODY DENIOES THE FACT THAT JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100 MILLION
RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS, AND THAT JEWISH EXECUTIONERS STABBED THE CZAR
AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH THEIR EYES!
THAT IS WHAT I CALL A H O L O C A U S T !
Relax, Alex. What did happen in the Soviet Union was bad enough.
Venceremos
2007-04-26 02:39:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.

that is what i call a holocaust
Michael Ejercito
2007-04-26 16:12:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
So then Stalin was Jewish?


Michael
f***@verizon.net
2007-04-26 16:17:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS
I wonder how many times he has to tell this lie before someone actually
believes it?
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
How insane can you get? No Jews did anything of the sort -
even NON Jews didn't do it. The actual tale is gruesome
enough without this lying vulture drooling ove rit.
Post by Michael Ejercito
So then Stalin was Jewish?
Oh, please - that's one of his favorite lies!

Susan
M_Elias
2007-04-27 01:52:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@verizon.net
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS
I wonder how many times he has to tell this lie before someone actually
believes it?
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
How insane can you get? No Jews did anything of the sort -
even NON Jews didn't do it. The actual tale is gruesome
enough without this lying vulture drooling ove rit.
Post by Michael Ejercito
So then Stalin was Jewish?
Oh, please - that's one of his favorite lies!
Susan
Hashem will destroy the earth with the fire of nuclear war but Israel will
survive and not even be affected

by the fallout. Hashem allowed Satan to create the goyim so when Moshiach
comes he will be the destroyer

that is the ruination of mankind excluding the Jews and those living on
Eretz Israel under Jewish Law.

Blesses are You Yahweh King of the Universe that destroys the Goyim.

The Christians think Jesus died so they could sin and live,

But when Moshiach comes every person on earth Jewish and non-Jewish alike
will be punished for their sins.



Amen Selah.
--
"Ignorance never settles a question"
M. Elias
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 06:09:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by M_Elias
Post by f***@verizon.net
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS
I wonder how many times he has to tell this lie before someone actually
believes it?
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
How insane can you get? No Jews did anything of the sort -
even NON Jews didn't do it. The actual tale is gruesome
enough without this lying vulture drooling ove rit.
Post by Michael Ejercito
So then Stalin was Jewish?
Oh, please - that's one of his favorite lies!
Susan
Hashem will destroy the earth with the fire of nuclear war but Israel will
survive and not even be affected
by the fallout. Hashem allowed Satan to create the goyim so when Moshiach
comes he will be the destroyer
that is the ruination of mankind excluding the Jews and those living on
Eretz Israel under Jewish Law.
Blesses are You Yahweh King of the Universe that destroys the Goyim.
The Christians think Jesus died so they could sin and live,
But when Moshiach comes every person on earth Jewish and non-Jewish alike
will be punished for their sins.
Wanker. There is no moshiach or whatever you call it.
Cazador
2007-04-28 02:56:03 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 26, 8:52 pm, "M_Elias" <***@exite.com> wrote:

Clip>
Post by M_Elias
Blesses are You Yahweh King of the Universe that destroys the Goyim.
Yaweh, your personal god, is going to exterminate six or eight billion
of the rest of us and preserve six million Jews? And in the meantime
we're supposed to support Israel's oppression of a part of the Goyim,
i.e., the Palestinians? Unfortunately, it is not hard to believe
you're serious. We've been listening to Deborah and Ariadne.

As I say, grease it up. We'll pass the hat for a ticket to your
nearest reserve unit.
B'inyamin C''ramer
2007-04-27 06:08:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by f***@verizon.net
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS
I wonder how many times he has to tell this lie before someone actually
believes it?
Post by Venceremos
AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
How insane can you get? No Jews did anything of the sort -
Really?

Jews and Bolshevism


Amongst themselves, the Jews are quite candid about their sympathy for
and involvement in Bolshevism.

On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: "There is much in the fact of
Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in
the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant
with the finest ideals of Judaism."

(Perhaps this explains why the Red Army uses a Jewish star as its
symbol?)

Probably the best-known exposé of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik
coup d'état was by Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated
Sunday Herald of 8 February 1920. Churchill wrote "With the notable
exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover
the principal inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish
leaders."

Communism was of course founded by Karl Marx whose grandfather was a
rabbi by the name of Mordeccai. Marx was given his initial
encouragement by a Communist-Zionist by the name of Moses Hess. As
founder and editor of the Rheinische Zeitung, the main organ of leftist
thought in Germany, he provided Karl Marx with his first important
platform. Later, in Brussels, he collaborated with Marx on The German
Ideology. It was Hess too who converted to Communism Friedrich Engels,
the wealthy textiles magnate who later subsidised Marx from the profits
of sweated labour in Britain and Germany.

When the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in
Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish coup
d'état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real name
Bronstein. He had been married by a rabbi in 1900, and whilst in exile
in New York he had worked for Novy Mir, described in the Church Times
(23 January 1925) as a "Yiddish newspaper."

The various reporters and diplomats who were there at the time of the
"Revolution" have given evidence as to its Jewish nature.

The widow of the Guardian's correspondent Mrs. Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams
wrote: "In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries were
filled with Jews."

The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik
'revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The
Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, Les Derniers Jours des
Romanofs, which gave the racial background of all the members of the
Soviet government. (This does not appear in the later English
translation, for some odd reason.) After the publication of this
monumental work, Wilton was ostracised by the press, and he died in
poverty in 1925. He reported that the Central Committee of the
Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:

NAME NATIONALITY
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Lourie (Larine) Jew
Ouritski Jew
Volodarski Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Krylenko Russian
Lounatcharski Russian



"The Council of the People's Commissars comprises the following:

MINISTRY NAME NATIONALITY
President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
Food Schlichter Jew
Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
State Control Lander Jew
State Lands Kauffman Jew
Works V. Schmidt Jew
Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
Religions Spitzberg Jew
Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Hygiene Anvelt Jew
Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
Press Volodarski Jew
Elections Ouritski Jew
Justice I. Steinberg Jew
Refugees Fenigstein Jew
Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew



"The following is the list of members of the Central Executive
Committee:

NAME NATIONALITY
Sverdlov (president) Jew
Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
Bruno Lett
Babtchinski Jew
Bukharin Russian
Weinberg Jew
Gailiss Jew
Ganzburg Jew
Danichevski Jew
Starck German
Sachs Jew
Scheinmann Jew
Erdling Jew
Landauer Jew
Linder Jew
Wolach Czech
Dimanstein Jew
Encukidze Georgian
Ermann Jew
Joffe Jew
Karkline Jew
Knigissen Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Krylenko Russian
KrassikofSachs Jew
Kaprik Jew
Kaoul Lett
Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
Latsis Jew
Lander Jew
Lounatcharski Russian
Peterson Lett
Peters Lett
Roudzoutas Jew
Rosine Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Stoutchka Lett
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Sosnovski Jew
Skrytnik Jew
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Teodorovitch Jew
Terian Armenian
Ouritski Jew
Telechkine Russian
Feldmann Jew
Froumkine Jew
Souriupa Ukranian
Tchavtchevadze Georgian
Scheikmann Jew
Rosental Jew
Achkinazi Imeretian
Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
Rose Jew
Sobelson (Radek) Jew
Sclichter Jew
Schikolini Jew
Chklianski Jew
Levine (Pravdine) Jew



"The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission
of Moscow:

NAME NATIONALITY
Dzerjinski (president) Pole
Peters (vice-president) Lett
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jewess
Karlson Lett
Schaumann Jew
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Glaperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Latzis Lett
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Lett
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlof Jew
Biesenski Jew
Blioumkine Jew
Alexandrevitch Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Lett
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Lett
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Lett


Although Lenin is described as a "Russian," in fact he was a mixture of
various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter Russian,
one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least one-quarter Kalmuck
(Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol appearance. Various authorities
allege that his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya was a Jewess and that her
family spoke Yiddish in the home.

A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke, the
Dutch consul in St. Petersburg, said that "Bolshevism is organised and
worked by Jews." The report was included in a pamphlet published as a
government White Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia No. 1 (1919) A
Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. However, the pamphlet
was quickly withdrawn and reissued with various excisions and
alterations made.

In the War Records Division of the United States National Archives
there is filed a report from an American Intelligence operative in St.
Petersburg. Under Record Group 20; Records of the American
Expeditionary Forces Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, G2 Intelligence wrote,
"The Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and
controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type."

Also in the U.S. National Archives are two telegrams sent by American
diplomats in Russia. State Department document 861.00/1757 sent on 2
May 1918 by U.S. Consul Summers in Moscow relates, "Jews predominant in
local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population."
Document 861.00/2205 from Consul Caldwell in Vladivostock on 5 July
1918 describes, "Fifty per cent of Soviet government in each town
consists of Jews of worst type."

In January, 1924, Lenin died from causes variously described as 'a
heart attack,' brain hemorrhage' and 'syphilis.' His comrades
immediately began fighting amongst themselves to see who was to become
his successor.

A relative outsider, Joseph Stalin, came to the fore and purged all
competition either by exiling or executing them. Since Stalin was not
Jewish, yet nearly all his opponents were, it is often suggested that
Stalin was anti-Semitic. This is far from the truth.

Stalin had three wives, all of them Jewesses. The first was Ekaterina
Svanidze who bore him one son, Jacob. His second wife was Kadya
Allevijah. She bore him a son Vassili and a daughter Svetlana. His
second wife died in mysterious circumstances, either by committing
suicide or murdered by Stalin. His third wife was Rosa Kaganovich, the
sister of Lazar Kaganovich, the head of Soviet industry. Stalin's
daughter (who in 1967 fled to the USA) then married Lazar's son Mihail
i.e. her step-mother's nephew. Svetlana Stalin had a total of four
husbands, three of them Jewish.

Stalin's vice-president Molotov was also married to a Jewess, whose
brother, Sam Karp, runs an export business in Connecticut. Just to
complicate things even more, the Molotov's (half-Jewish) daughter also
called Svetlana was engaged to be married to Stalin's son Vassili.

After the death of Stalin, his successors kept up the tradition, for a
report in the B'nai B'rith Messenger relates: "To show that Russia
treats its Jews well, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev this week remarked
at a reception at the Polish Embassy that not only he himself and
Soviet President Klementi Voroshilov, but also half the members of the
Praesidium have Jewish wives. Mr. Kruschev made this remark to Israeli
Ambassador Joseph Avidar, who was amongst the guests." (Kruschev's wife
was yet another Kaganovitch.)

According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November 1964
the present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess, and his
children are brought up as Jews. There are a number of prominent Jews
in the Soviet government, including Dimitri Dymshits in charge of
industry, Lev Shapiro regional secretary of Birobidjan, and Yuri
Andropov in charge of the secret police, the KGB. In fact, every secret
police chief in Soviet history has been a Jew, from the first Uritsky
to the most recent, the murderous Beria. A Jew is also in charge of the
Soviet economy - Leonid Kantorovich.

It is a well-known fact that the Bolsheviks were and are financed by
Jewish interests in the West.

At a Bolshevik celebration rally in New York's Carnegie Hall on the
night of 23 March 1917, a telegram of support from Jacob Schiff of
Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was read out. The telegram was reprinted in the next
morning's New York Times. Schiff later tried to deny his involvement,
but thirty years later his grandson John admitted in the New York
Journal-American (3 February 1949) that the old man had sunk twenty
million dollars into the Bolshevik cause.

Another Western bankers who poured funds into Bolshevik Russia was Olaf
Ashberg of the Stockholm Nia Banken. He remained the Soviets' paymaster
until the late 1940s. The London Evening Standard of 6 September 1948
reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland "for secret meetings with
Swiss government officials and banking executives. Diplomatic circles
describe Mr. Ashberg as the 'Soviet banker' who advanced large sums to
Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At the time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg
gave Trotsky money to form and equip the first unit of the Red Army."

The Bolsheviks also received assistance from Armand Hammer, who still
commutes back and forward between New York and Moscow to take care of
his business interests in both communities. Hammer's Occidental Oil
Company is at the moment building a 1600 mile chemicals pipeline in
southern Russia. He is also on such good terms with the Soviets that he
personally arranges for Soviet art galleries to lend paintings to
America.

Another American-based businessman to help out the Soviet economy is
Michael Fribourg, who owns the massive Continental Grain Company.
Together with the Louis Dreyfus Corporation, these Jewish speculators
were able to buy up vast quantities of cheap American grain in 1972,
sell it to the Soviets at a vast profit, and collect an export subsidy
from the U.S. taxpayer.

In every other East European country, it is exactly the same story:

In Hungary a Communist revolution was staged in 1919, instigated by the
Jew Bela Kun (Cohen). During the three month regime, the country was
turned upside down in a reign of murder and terror. Here again, the
government was composed almost entirely of Jews. And it was this factor
which brought about the regime's downfall, as the ordinary Hungarians
detested Jewish dictatorship. Kun was deposed and fled to the Soviet
Union, where he became chief of the secret police, the Cheka, in
southern Russia.

It was not until 1945 that the Jews were able to regain control. Three
Russian Jews were installed as the ruling triumvirate, Matyas Rakosi
(Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer) and Zoltan Vas. Both Rakosi and Gero
had been members of Kun's bloody government.

In Germany, the Jews also tried to take over there in the chaos that
followed the First World War. Aided by funds from the Soviet Ambassador
Joffe, Rosa Luxemburg's Spartacus Bund attempted to overthrow the
government. The revolt was quelled and its leaders Luxemburg and Karl
Liebknecht executed.

The post-war dictator of Roumania, Anna Pauker, was the daughter of a
Bucharest kosher butcher. For a time she earned her living teaching
Hebrew. her father and brother now live in Israel.

Although Tito was the only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron Curtain
in the late 1940s, he was tutored by the Jew Mosa Pijade. According to
John Gunther in Behind the Iron Curtain, "He is Tito's mentor...
Whatever ideological structure Tito may have, he got it from the shrewd
old man."

Moscow's puppet government in Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s was run
by another Jew, Rudolph Slansky.

In Poland too, Jews occupied virtually every position of authority in
the post-war Communist regime. Prominent among these were Minc,
Skryesewski, Modzelewski and Berman. Jacob Berman gradually eclipsed
the others until he became supreme dictator by himself. Also, Gomulka's
wife was a Jewess.

Even in China, Soviet Jews were at work helping Mao Tse Tung. High up
in the Political Department of the Red Army in China were W. N.
Levitschev and J. B. Gamarnik.
Frank Arthur
2007-04-26 16:52:44 UTC
Permalink
Never one Russian Jewish leader from Stalin to Putin!
Venceremos
2007-04-26 19:27:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
So then Stalin was Jewish?
Michael
THE KILLERS WERE JEWISH THAT IS FOR CERTAI N, SVERDLOV, WHO ORDERED
THAT CZR AND HIS CHILDREN BE EXECUTED BY BAYONETTING THEM IN THE EYES,
WAS JEWISH.

BESIDES THE TRANSLATION OF STALIN'S NAME; DZUGASHVILI, MEANS SON OF A
JEW IN GEORGIAN
Cazador
2007-04-26 20:24:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
So then Stalin was Jewish?
Michael
Alex seems to think so. We know better but don't tell him. I
understand he's got a double caps keyboard.
ElParedon
2007-05-10 20:52:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cazador
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Venceremos
Post by M_Elias
I'd like to kill those that openly profess the holocaust did not exist
because when they deny the holocaust they blaspheme the name of Hashem.
HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN WHEN THE JEWISH COMMISSARS SLAUGHTERED 100
MILLION RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS BETWEEN 1917 AND 1989. NOT TO MENTION
THE FACT THAT THE JEWS BAYONETTED THE CZAR AND HIS CHILDREN THROUGH
BOTH EYES.
So then Stalin was Jewish?
Michael
Alex seems to think so. We know better but don't tell him. I
understand he's got a double caps keyboard.
For your info in Gruzian lnguage, which is Josip Dzugalvili's native tongue,
his name does mean "son of a Jew". Now I do not know if he was or not, but
his name says so. Addirionally, all the Jews changed their names to look
Russian. The fellow that ordered the killing of my father's family was name
Bronstein, but his CHEKA name was Trotskiy.

The Jew who ordered the killing of the Czar, and bayonetting his children
through the eyes was named Sverlov, but that was not his real name either.
Go figure

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...